Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Lazy Netflix B: An Ethnographic Study on the Use of Humour and Visual Metaphors in Teaching Graphic Facilitation Cover

The Lazy Netflix B: An Ethnographic Study on the Use of Humour and Visual Metaphors in Teaching Graphic Facilitation

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Agerbeck, B. (2012). The Graphic Facilitator’s Guide: How to use your listening, thinking & drawing skills to make meaning. Chicago: Loosetooth.
  2. Baker, F. A. (2018). The use of humour in teaching and learning in higher education (PhD dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand). Retrieved 20 September from https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/8238/AbuBakarFarhana2018PhD.pdf?sequence=1
  3. Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. (2011). A review of humour in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115144. DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
  4. Bateson, P. (2014). Play, playfulness, creativity and innovation. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(2), 99112. DOI: 10.12966/abc.05.02.2014
  5. Booth-Butterfield, S., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (1991). Individual differences in the communication of humorous message. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 205217. DOI: 10.1080/10417949109372831
  6. Booth-Butterfield, M., Booth-Butterfield, S., & Wanzer, M. B. (2007). Funny students cope better: Patterns of humor enactment and coping effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 55, 299315. DOI: 10.1080/01463370701490232
  7. Booth-Butterfield, M., & Wanzer, M. (2010). Humorous communication as goal-oriented communication. In D. Fassett & J. Warren (Eds.), SAGE handbook of communication and instruction. Sage, pp. 221240.
  8. Bowen, T., & Evans, M. M. (2015). What does knowledge look like? Drawing as a means of knowledge representation and knowledge construction. Education for Information, 31, 5372. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-150947
  9. Brown, S. (2009). source>Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. Avery.
  10. Causey, A. (2017). Drawn to see: Drawing as an ethnographic method. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative, and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
  12. Frank, N., & Madsen, A. (2020). Draw to learn. A guide for teachers and leaders who aspire to create curious and collaborative learning cultures using Graphic Facilitation. Copenhagen: Tools for Schools.
  13. Glenn, P. J., & Knapp, M. L. (1987). The interactive framing in adult conversation. Communication Quarterly, 35(1), 4866. DOI: 10.1080/01463378709369670
  14. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  15. Groos, K. (1901). The play of man. New York: D. Appleton & Co. (Original work published in 1899). DOI: 10.1037/13084-000
  16. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photoelicitation. Visual studies, 17(1), 1326. DOI: 10.1080/14725860220137345
  17. Hautopp, H., & Nørgaard, M. (2017). Playful participation. How pen, provocation & a personal touch boost user engagement in workshops. Conjunctions. Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 4(1). DOI: 10.7146/tjcp.v3i1.26467
  18. Hautopp, H., & Ørngreen, R. (2018). A Review of Graphic Facilitation in Organizational and Educational Contexts. Designs for Learning, 10(1), 5362. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.97
  19. Ivarsson, J., Linderoth, J., & Säljö, R. (2009). Representations in practices: A sociocultural approach to multimodality in reasoning. Routledge, pp. 201212.
  20. Lantz-Andersson, A. (2009). Framing in educational practices. learning activities, digital technology and the logic of situated action (PhD dissertation, Göteburgs Universitet).
  21. Leavy, P. (2020). Methods Meets Arts: Art-Based Research Practice. (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Publication.
  22. Nielsen, E., Søndergaard, K., Nielsen, I., & Moltke, H. (2016). Grafisk Facilitering – når ord og billeder mødes. Denmark: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
  23. Nørgaard, M. (2012). Using extreme sketching in creative business modelling. Cumulus conference proceedings, Santiago, Chile.
  24. Pink, S. (2007). Doing Visual Ethnography (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9780857025029
  25. Qvist-Sørensen, O., & Baastrup, L. (2019). Visual Collaboration. A Powerful Toolkit for Improving Meetings, Projects, and Processes. Wiley.
  26. Schön, D. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (1993) chap. 9 (pp. 137163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011
  27. Sibbet, D. (2001). A Graphic Facilitation Retrospective. Adapted from presentation at the International Association of Facilitators The Art and Mastery of Facilitation—Navigating the Future IAF Conference, 2001, 16–20 May, Minnesota.
  28. Sibbet, D. (2008). Visual intelligence: Using the deep patterns of visual language to build cognitive skills. Theory into Practice, 47, 118127. DOI: 10.1080/00405840801992306
  29. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play: rhetorics of fate. The performance studies reader, 13238.
  30. Tanis, D. J. (2012). Exploring play/playfulness and learning in the adult and higher education classroom. The Pennsylvania State University.
  31. Tyler, C., Valek, L., & Rowland, R. (2005). Graphic facilitation and large-scale interventions: Supporting dialogue between cultures at a global, multicultural, interfaith event. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(139), 139152. DOI: 10.1177/0021886304272850
  32. Valenza, C., & Adkins, J. (2009). Understanding visual thinking: The history and future of graphic facilitation. ACM Interactions, July, August, 3945.
  33. Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instruction humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 118. DOI: 10.1080/03634520903367238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.184 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 72 - 84
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2022
Published on: Jun 23, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Heidi Hautopp, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.