Exploring Educational Designs by Schematic Models: Visualizing Educational Value and Critical Issues of Recognition and Socio-Material Frames
References
- Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. DOI: 10.1080/0965079930010102
- Andersen, M. F., & Munksby, N. (2018). Didactical Design Principles to Apply When Introducing Student-generated Digital Multimodal Representations in the Science Classroom. Designs for Learning, 10(1), 112–122. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.100
- Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203078952
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315687537
- Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing Social Infrastructure: Critical Issues in Creating Learning Environments With Technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301–329. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_1
- Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. DOI: 10.1007/BF00138871
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th edn. New York, NY: Open University Press.
- Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012).
Defining twenty-first century skills . In E. Care, P. Griffin, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66), Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2 - Boistrup, L. B., & Selander, S. (2022). Designs for Research, Teaching and Learning: A Framework for Future Education. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003096498
- Cartwright, V., & Hammond, M. (2007). ’Fitting it in’: a study exploring ICT use in a UK primary school. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (Online Edition), 23(3), 390–407. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1259
- Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. DOI: 10.3102/0034654315582065
- Conole, G. (2013).
Describing learning activities: Tools and resources to guide practice . In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 81–91), London: Routledge. - Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2015). Teachers as co-designers of technology-rich learning activities for early literacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 443–459. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.953197
- Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2021).
Working with Multimodal Texts in Education . In Multimodal Texts in Disciplinary Education, (pp. 25–43), Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63960-0_4 - Delsing, L.-O. (2007).
Scandinavian intercomprehension today . In ten Thije, J. D. & Zeevaert, L. (Eds.), Receptive Multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic concepts (pp. 231–246), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1075/hsm.6.15del - Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
- Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. New York: Open University Press.
- Elliott, J. (2020).
Principles and Methods for the conduct of Case Studies in School-based Educational Action Research . In Anderberg, E. (Ed.), Skolnära forskningsmetoder (pp. 111–141), Lund: Studentlitteratur. - EU. (2017). Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (DigComp 2.1). Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106281 - Fleischer, H. (2011). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.004
- Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Godhe, A.-L., Magnusson, P., & Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2020). Adequate Digital Competence: Exploring changes in the Swedish national curriculum. Educare, 2020(2), 74–91. DOI: 10.24834/educare.2020.2.4
- Harper, B., & Milman, N. (2016). One-to-One Technology in K-12 Classrooms: A Review of the Literature From 2004 Through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129–142. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2016.1146564
- Hudson, B. (2011).
Didactical Design for Technology Enhanced Learning . In Hudson, B. & Meyer, M. (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 223–238), Leverkusen Opladen: Barbara Budrich. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvhktksh.16 - Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven Affordances of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: How to Support Collaborative Learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
- Ingram, N. R. (2014). Time past: impacts of ICT on the pedagogic discourse in the Interactive project. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.972440
- Krogh, E., Qvortrup, A., & Ting Graf, S. (Eds) (2021). Didaktik and Curriculum in Ongoing Dialogue. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003099390
- Künzli, R. (2000).
German Didaktik: Models of re-presentation, of intercourse, and of experience . In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition, (pp. 41–54), Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. - Laurillard, D. (2003). Rethinking University Teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology, 2nd edn, London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203304846
- Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. The JHGI Giesbers reports on education, 10, 1999.
- Lindstrand, F., & Åkerfeldt, A. (2009).
En förändring av lärandets kontext – aspekter på lärande i gestaltningsarbete med digitala resurser . I J. Linderoth (Ed.), Individ, teknik och lärande (pp. 200–217), Stockholm: Carlssons. - Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87–104. DOI: 10.1080/17439880902921949
- Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for teaching and learning in technology-rich learning environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 258–271. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-04-05
- Lundh Snis, U., Nilsson, L., Nilsson, A., Pareto, L., Petersen, A.-L., Sofkova Hashemi, S., Spante, M., & Wicke, K. (2012). Nordic Innovation Networks in Education: Dealing with Educational Challenges with Cross Boarder Collaboration and User Driven Design. In Bernhard, I. (Ed.) Uddevalla Symposium 2012: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Networks,
14–16 June, 2012 , Faro, Portugal, 553–571. - Majgaard, G., Misfeldt, M., & Nielsen, J. (2011). How design-based research and action research contribute to the development of a new design for learning. Designs for learning, 4(2), 8–27. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.38
- McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012/2019). Conducting educational design research, London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203818183
- Merchant, G. (2008).
Digital writing in the early years . In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies, (pp. 751–774), New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. - Mor, Y., & Craft, B. (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in Learning Technology, 20. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196
- Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 51–74. DOI: 10.1142/S1793206807000300
- Peters, V., & Slotta, J. D. (2010).
Scaffolding knowledge communities in the classroom: New opportunities in the web 2.0 era . In M. J. Jacobson & P. Reinmann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 205–232), New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_8 - Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014).
Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology . In L. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.025 - Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (Vol. 1.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande. Ett multimodalt perspektiv. Stockholm: Norstedts.
- Skolverket. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. Stockholm: Fritzes.
- Smith, S. J., & Harvey, E. E. (2014). K-12 online lesson alignment to the principles of Universal Design for Learning: the Khan Academy, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 222–242. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2014.992402
- Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2014). Meaning-making and Communication in Virtual Nordic Classrooms: transmediation in cross-border understanding. In EDULEARN14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona
7–9 July 2014 , 1820–1830. - Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2017). Socio-semiotic patterns in digital meaning-making: semiotic choice as indicator of communicative experience. Language & Education, 31(5), 432–448. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2017.1305396
- Sofkova Hashemi, S., & Spante, M. (2016).
Den didaktiska designens betydelse: IT-didaktiska modeller och ramvillkor . I Kollaborativ undervisning i digital skolmiljö (pp. 125–135). Malmö: Gleerups. - Sofkova Hashemi, S., Wennås Brante, E., Cederlund, K., Godhe, A.-L., Magnusson, P., Stenliden, L., Svärdemo Åberg, E., & Åkerfeldt, A. (2020).
Digitala textkompetenser och undervisning: Texter, information och multimodalitet i skolan . Svenska med didaktisk inriktning (SmDI 13): Bildning, utbildning, fortbildning, 22–23 november 2018, Linköpings universitet, 271–287. - Sun, Y. H. (2017). Design for CALL – possible synergies between CALL and design for learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 575–599. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1329216
- Svensson, A., Rustand, K. A., Sofkova Hashemi, S., & Steffensen, T. (2013). Students’ Use of Semiotic Structures in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication – An Inter-Scandinavian Study. In The European Conference on Technology in the Classroom (ECTC),
July 11–14 2013 , Brighton, UK, 150–163.http://iafor.org/archives/proceedings/ECTC/ECTC2013_proceedings.pdf - Svensson, E., Pendrill, A.-M., & Pelger, S. (2020). Teaching with Google Classroom. Educare, 2020(4), 158–191. DOI: 10.24834/educare.2020.4.7
- Svärdemo Åberg, E., & Åkerfeldt, A. (2017). Design and recognition of multimodal texts – selection of digital tools and modes in the basis of social and material premises? Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 283–306. DOI: 10.1007/s40692-017-0088-3
- Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice (codex for research).
www.vr.se . - Undervisningsministeriet. (2009). Fælles Mål 2009 – Dansk. Retrieved from
http://www.uvm.dk/Service/Publikationer/Publikationer/Folkeskolen/2009/Faelles-Maal-2009-Dansk/ - Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2013). Læreplan i norsk. Retrieved from
http://www.udir.no/kl06/NOR1-05/ - van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 259–287. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5
- Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
- Walsh, M. (2008). Worlds have collided and modes have merged: classroom evidence of changed literacy practices. Literacy, 42(2), 101–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00495.x
- Warschauer, M. (2008). Laptops and literacy: A multi-site case study. Pedagogies, 3(1), 52–67. DOI: 10.1080/15544800701771614
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Willermark, S., Pareto, L., & Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2016).
Didactical designs in use – exploring technological, pedagogical and content knowledge . Designs for learning, 2016, 17–20 May, Copenhagen, Denmark, 253–268.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.171 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 28
Submitted on: Mar 24, 2021
Accepted on: Feb 9, 2022
Published on: Feb 25, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2022 Sylvana Sofkova Hashemi, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.