Design Concepts, Principles and Patterns in the Curriculum of the New Computing Education Era
By: Anna Mavroudi, Olga Fragou and Christos Goumopoulos
References
- Andersen, M. F., & Munksby, N. (2018). Didactical Design Principles to Apply When Introducing Student-generated Digital Multimodal Representations in the Science Classroom. Designs for Learning, 10(1). DOI: 10.16993/dfl.100
- Athanasiadis, N., Sotiriou, S., Zervas, P., & Sampson, D. G. (2014).
The open discovery space portal: A socially-powered and open federated infrastructure . In Digital systems for open access to formal and informal learning (pp. 11–23). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02264-2_2 - Baker, D. (2006, May). Social Learning Capital–interlinking social capital, lifelong learning and quality learning conversations. In Adult and Community Education Aotearoa Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.
- Banerjee, G., & Murthy, S. (2018). CuVIS: An interactive tool for instructors to create effective customized learning designs with visualizations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.3773
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
- Burd, B., Elahi, A., Russell, I., Barker, L., Pérez, A. F., Siever, B., …, & Guerra, J. G. (2017, June). The Internet of Things in CS education: current challenges and future potential. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 392–392).
ACM . DOI: 10.1145/3059009.3081331 - Campos, A. M., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. A., & Livingstone, D. E. (2012). Analyzing effectiveness of pedagogical scenarios for learning programming a learning path data model. Editor: Ion Mierluş-Mazilu, 51.
- Charachristos, C., Goumopoulos, C., & Kameas, A. (2014). Enhancing collaborative learning and management tasks through pervasive computing technologies. Ambient Computing, Applications, Services and Technologies, 27–33.
- Delistavrou, K. T., & Kameas, A. D. (2017, April). Exploring ways to exploit UMI technologies in STEM education: Comparison of secondary computer science curricula of Greece, Cyprus and England. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1824–1830).
IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943098 - Design Principles Database website. (n.d.). Retrieved 20 September 2019 from:
http://www.edu-design-principles.org - Doran, R., Saraiva, J., & Tyszka, S. (2018, September). Design Thinking for Space Exploration. In European Planetary Science Congress, 12.
- European Commission. (2018). Developing key competencies for all throughout life. Retrieved 20 September 2019 from
https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/document-library-docs/factsheet-key-competences-lifelong-learning_en.pdf - Fragou, O., Kameas, A., & Zaharakis, I. D. (2017, April). An instructional design process for creating a U-learning ecology. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2017 IEEE (pp. 1817–1823).
IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943097 - Gaitanis, F., & Kossyvas, I. (2018).
Harnessing Internet of Things Technology in STEM Education , Msc Thesis, Information & Communication Systems Engineering Dept., University of the Aegean, Samos, Greece. Retrieved 20 September 2019 fromhttp://hellanicus.lib.aegean.gr/bitstream/handle/11610/18474/Thesis_Gaitanis_Kossyvas.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y - Georgoutsou, M., Komis, V., & Tzavara, A. (2012). A study of how students from ECEDU of Patras design educational scenarios with ICT. In Proceedings of the Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation “ICT in Education”, Volos, 28–30 September.
- Goumopoulos, C., Fragou, O., Chanos, N., Delistavrou, K., Zaharakis, I. D., Stefanis, V., & Kameas, A. (2018). The UMI-Sci-Ed Platform: Integrating UMI Technologies to Promote Science Education. In CSEDU (1) (pp. 78–90). DOI: 10.5220/0006686200780090
- Goumopoulos, C., Nicopolitidis, P., Gavalas, D., & Kameas, A. (2017). A distance learning curriculum on pervasive computing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 27(1–2), 122–146. DOI: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2017.080996
- Grammenos, N., Tsanakas, P., & Pavlatou, E. (2017). A web tool for the designing and development of digital, interactive education/teaching scenarios at the service of education. In Proceedings of INTED2017-11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 4863–4872).
IATED . DOI: 10.21125/inted.2017.1136 - Gupta, N., Tejovanth, N., & Murthy, P. (2012, January). Learning by creating: Interactive programming for Indian high schools. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Technology Enhanced Education (ICTEE) (pp. 1–3).
IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/ICTEE.2012.6208643 - Herger, L. M., & Bodarky, M. (2015, March). Engaging students with open source technologies and Arduino. In 2015 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 27–32).
IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119938 - Herrington, A., Herrington, J., & Mantei, J. (2009).
Design principles for mobile learning . In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 129–138). Wollongong: University of Wollongong. Retrieved 20 September 2019 fromhttp://ro.uow.edu.au/ - Highfield, K. (2010). Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 22–27.
- Höök, K., & Löwgren, J. (2012). Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19(3), 23. DOI: 10.1145/2362364.2362371
- Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using the Design Principles Database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 187–201. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-006-8993-x
- Kidron, A., & Kali, Y. (2017). Extending the applicability of design-based research through research-practice partnerships. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 1(2).
- Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7–18. DOI: 10.1162/IJLM_a_00091
- Lejeune, A., & Pernin, J. P. (2004, December). A Taxonomy for Scenario-Based Engineering. In CELDA (pp. 249–256).
- Magdalinou, K., & Papadakis, S. (2017, November).
The use of educational scenarios using state-of-the-art it technologies such as ubiquitous computing, mobile computing and the internet of things as an incentive to choose a scientific career . In Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning (pp. 915–923). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_89 - Looi, C. K., Wong, L. H., & Milrad, M. (2015). Guest editorial: Special issue on seamless, ubiquitous, and contextual learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1, 2–4. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2014.2387455
- Mavroudi, A., Divitini, M., Gianni, F., Mora, S., & Kvittem, D. R. (2018, April). Designing IoT applications in lower secondary schools. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1120–1126).
IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363355 - Mavroudi, A., Giannakos, M., Divitini, M., & Jaccheri, L. (2016). Arenas for Innovative STEM Education: Scenarios from The Norwegian University of Science and Technology. In Hellenic Conference on Innovating STEM Education,
Athens . Retrieved 20 September 2019 fromhttp://stemeducation.upatras.gr/histem2016/assets/files/histem2016_submissions/histem2016_paper_39.pdf - Mershad, K., & Wakim, P. (2018). A Learning Management System Enhanced with Internet of Things Applications. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 23–40. DOI: 10.5539/jel.v7n3p23
- Nanjappa, A., & Grant, M. M. (2003). Constructing on constructivism: The role of technology. Electronic Journal for the integration of Technology in Education, 2(1), 38–56.
- Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton-Detzner, C., & Howell, H. (2010). OER as a Model for Enhanced Teaching and Learning. In Proceedings of Open ED Conference 2010. Retreived 20 September 2019 from
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/4995 - Prieto, L. P., Alavi, H., & Verma, H. (2017, September). Strong technology-enhanced learning concepts. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 454–459). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_42
- Reed, D., Larus, J. R., & Gannon, D. (2012). Imagining the future: Thoughts on computing. Computer, 45(1), 25–30. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2011.327
- Resnick, M. (2013).
Learn to code, code to learn . EdSurge, May, 54. - Sasson, I. (2019). Pedagogical characteristics of classroom learning tasks: A three-dimensional methodological framework. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(2), 163–182. DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2018.1447507
- Sentence, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2015). Teachers’ perspectives on successful strategies for teaching Computing in school. In A. Brodnik, & C. Lewin (Eds.), IFIP TC3 Working Conference “A New Culture of Learning: Computing and next Generations”, 201–210. Preliminary Proceedings. Lithuania,
Vilnius University . - Siemens, G. (2005). Learning development cycle: Bridging learning design and modern knowledge needs. Elearnspace everything elearning.
- Siemens, G. (2007). Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples, 53–68.
- Toh, L. P. E., Causo, A., Tzuo, P. W., Chen, I., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 148–163.
- Varney, M. W., Janoudi, A., Aslam, D. M., & Graham, D. (2012). Building young engineers: TASEM for third graders in Woodcreek Magnet Elementary School. IEEE Trans Education, 55(1), 78–82. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2011.2131143
- Viberg, O., & Mavroudi, A. (
2018, September ). The Role of Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things for Developing 21st Century Skills Among Learners: Experts’ Views. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 640–643).Springer, Cham . DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_63 - Wesley, J. (2011).
‘Analyzing Qualitative Data’ . In K. Archer, & L. Berdahl (Eds.), Explorations: A Navigator’s Guide to Research in Canadian Political Science, 2nd edn, Toronto: Oxford University Press. - Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of ACM, 49, 33–35. DOI: 10.1145/1118178.1118215
- Yang, T., & Koszalka, T. A. (2016). Level of engagement and its application to learning resources. Retrieved 20 September 2019 from:
http://ridlr.syr.edu/publications/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.140 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 141 - 153
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2019
Accepted on: Oct 25, 2019
Published on: Nov 25, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2019 Anna Mavroudi, Olga Fragou, Christos Goumopoulos, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.