Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Teachers’ Designs for Learning Practices when Designing for Students as Learning Designers Cover

Teachers’ Designs for Learning Practices when Designing for Students as Learning Designers

Open Access
|Apr 2019

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs,28(3), 801831. DOI: 10.1086/345321
  2. Barthes, R. (1977/1964). “Rhetoric of the Image.” In: His Image-Music-Text: Essays. Selected and Translated by Stephen Heath, 3251. London: Fontana, 1977. (Originally published in 1964).
  3. Bertelsen, O. W., Breinbjerg, M., & Pold, S. (2007).Instrumentness for Creativity Mediation, Materiality & Metonymy. C&C ’07 Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, 233242. DOI: 10.1145/1254960.1254992
  4. Callon, M. (1992). The Dynamics of Techno-Economic Networks. Coombs, R., Saviotti, P., & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Technological Change And Company Strategy: Economic and Social Perspectives. London, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovaovich.
  5. Castells, M. (2000). End of millenium. Information age: Economy, Society and Culture. MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  6. Christensen, S., & Kreiner, K. (1991). Projektledelse I løst koblede systemer: Ledelse og læring I en ufuldkommen verden. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
  7. Dale, E. L. (1997). Pedagogik og professionalitet. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal A/S.
  8. Dale, E. L. (2000). Professionalisering og læring i organisationer. I: P. Andersen og P Frederiksen (red.): Innovation, competence, læring. Frederiksberg: Dafolo.
  9. Danish Ministry of education. (2009). Fælles mål 2009 – dansk. Faghægte 1. København: Undervisningsministeriet.
  10. de Laet, M., & Mol, M. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225263. DOI: 10.1177/030631200030002002
  11. de Saussure, F. (1977/1916). Course in general linguistics. (Translated by W. Baskin). Glasgow: Fontana/Collins. Originally published in 1916.
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In: Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of human motivation, 85107. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
  13. Design to Improve life education. (2018). http://designtoimprovelifeeducation.dk/da/content/design-improve-life-kompasset accessed 21 September 2018.
  14. Dourish, P. (2006). Re-space-ing place: “place” and “space” ten years on. CSCW ’06 Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 299308. NY: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1180875.1180921
  15. EMU. (2018). https://www.emu.dk/modul/design-thinking-i-projektopgaven accessed 21 September 2018.
  16. Illeris, K. (2006). Læring. Roskilde Universitets Forlag.
  17. Jakobson, R., & Halle, M. (1956). The Fundamentals of Language. The Hauge: Mouton.
  18. Kensing, F., & Madsen, K. H. (1991). Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. In: Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, 155168. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  19. Koschmann, T. D. (1994). Toward a Theory of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 3(3), 219225. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_1
  20. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality – A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London and New York: Routledge.
  21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
  22. Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping. Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotecnical Change, 225258. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
  23. Levinsen, K. (2013). Didaktisk design i netværksskolen – at sætte rammer for hverdagens praksis. Garde-Tschertok, D., & Gottlieb, A. (Eds.), Netværksskolen. København: Akademisk Forlag.
  24. Levinsen, K. (2017). Didaktisk forstyrrelse – erfaringer fra et samarbejde mellem forsker og praktikere. Paideia, 13, 1726.
  25. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The Raw and the Cooked. London: Cape.
  26. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2007). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6814.001.0001
  27. Monaco, J. (1977). How to Read a Film. Oxford University Press: New York.
  28. Noble, J., Biddle, R., & Tempero, E. (2002). Metaphor and Metonymy in Object-Oriented Design Patterns. Australian Computer Science Communications, 24(1), 187195.
  29. Norman, D. (1988, 2001). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
  30. OECD. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How ca you prepare students for the new Global Economy? https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdf accessed 10 Jan 2018.
  31. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). 10 sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433474. DOI: 10.5465/19416520802211644
  32. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction Design: Beyond Human – Computer Interaction. 2rd edition. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  33. Schoeneborn, D., Vásquez, C., & Cornelissen, J. (2016). Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human relations, 69(9), 915944. DOI: 10.1177/0018726715612899
  34. Sefton-Green, J. (2006). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school: A report for nesta futurelab. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab.
  35. Skovbjerg, H. M. (2018). About Play. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  36. Sørensen, B. H. (2002). Børnene nye læringsfærdigheder – didaktiske perspektiver. Sørensen, B. H., Jessen, C., & Olesen, B. R. (Eds.), Børn på nettet. Kommunikation og læring. København: Gads Forlag.
  37. Sørensen, B. H., Audon, L., & Levinsen, K. (2010). Skole 2.0. Aarhus: Klim.
  38. Sørensen, B. H., & Levinsen, K. (2014). Didaktisk design – digitale læreprocesser. København: Akademisk Forlag.
  39. Sørensen, B. H., & Levinsen, K. (2014a). Digital Production and Students as Learning Designers. Designs for Learning, 7(1), 5473. DOI: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0011
  40. Sørensen, B. H., & Levinsen, K. (2015). Evaluation as a Powerful Practice in Digital Learning Processes. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 290300.
  41. Sørensen, B. H., & Levinsen, K. (2018). Den hybride skole. Aarhus: Klim. To be published in ultimo 2018.
  42. Tosca, S., & Sørensen, B. H. (2017). Spændingfeltet mellem proces og produkt. Sørensen, B. H., Levinsen, K., & Skovbjerg, H. M. (Eds.), Digital produktion – deltagelse og læring, 2744. København: Dafolo.
  43. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice – Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932Ferovid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.111 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 39
Submitted on: May 2, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 8, 2019
Published on: Apr 5, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Karin Tweddell Levinsen, Birgitte Holm Sørensen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.