Emerging Visual Literacy through Enactments by Visual Analytics and Students
By: Ulrika Bodén and Linnéa Stenliden
References
- Ainley, J., Nardi, E., & Pratt, D. (2000). The construction fo meanings for trend in active graphing. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(2), 85–114. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009854103737
- Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Compututers & Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
- Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
- Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
- Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Keim, D., MacEachren, A. M., & Wrobel, S. (2011). Challenging problems of geospatial visual analytics. Part Special Issue on Challenging Problems in Geovisual Analytics, 22(4), 251–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.04.001
- Avgerinou, M. D. (2007). Towards a Visual Literacy Index. Journal of Visual Literacy, 27(1), 29–46. DOI: 10.1080/23796529.2007.11674644
- Avgerinou, M. D., & Pettersson, R. (2011). Toward a cohesive theory of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(2), 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/23796529.2011.11674687
- Bamford, A. (2003). The Visual Literacy White Paper. Australia: A Report Commissioned for Adobe Systems Pty Ltd. (p 7). Retrieved from Stockley, Uxbridge.
- Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1063–1088. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20086
- Callon, M. (1986).
Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay . In: Law, J. (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge, 196–233. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. - Callow, J. (2008). Show Me: Principles for Assessing Students’ Visual Literacy. The Reading Teacher, 61(8), 616–626. DOI: 10.1598/RT.61.8.3
- Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2017). The logic of design research. Learning: Research and Practice, 1–30. DOI: 10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367
- Eppler, M. (2007). Toward a visual turn in collaboration analysis? Building Research & Information, 35(5). DOI: 10.1080/09613210701355724
- Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183–210. DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
- Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
- Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Ho, Q., Lundblad, P., Åström, T., & Jern, M. (2011). A Web-Enabled Visualization Toolkit for Geovisual Analytics Visualisation and Data Analysis. Paper presented at the A Web-Enabled Visualization Toolkit for Geovisual Analytics Visualisation and Data Analysis, San Francisco.
- Janvier, C. (1998). The notion of chronicle as an epistemological obstacle to the concept of function. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1): 79–103. DOI: 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)80062-5
- Jern, M., & Stenliden, L. (2011). >Visual Storytelling applied to educational world statistics. Paper presented at the Statistics for policymaking: Europe 2020, Charlemagne Building, Brussels.
- Johansson Svensson, A., Rustand, K. A., Sofkova Hashemi, S., & Steffensen, T. (2013). Students’ Use of Semiotic Structures in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication – An Inter-Scandinavian Study. Paper presented at the ECTC-2013, The European Conference on Technology in the Classroom: “The Impact of Innovation: Technology and You”. Brighton, UK.
- Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society/Bruno Latour. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1987.
- Law, J. (1987).
Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion . In: Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, 111–134. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. - Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
- Law, J. (2007). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. version of 25th April 2007. Available at:
http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf (downloaded on 4th of January, 2018). - Lopatovska, I. (2016). Engaging young children in visual literacy instruction. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–5. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301101
- Lundblad, P. (2013). Applied Geovisual Analytics and Storytelling. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Science and Technology.
- Lundblad, P., & Jern, M. (2012).
Visual Storytelling in Education Applied to Spatial-Temporal Multivariate Statistics Data . In: Dill, J., Earnshaw, R., Kasik, D., Vince, J., & Wong, P. C. (Eds.), Expanding the Frontiers of Visual Analytics and Visualization, 175–198. Springer. - MacLure, M. (2013).
Coding as an Analytic Practice in Qualitative Research . In: Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies, 164–183. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. - Martín-Bylund, A. (2017). Towards a minor bilingualism: Exploring variations of language and literacy in early childhood education. (33 Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary), Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. Retrieved from:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-139853 DiVA database. DOI: 10.3384/diss.diva-139853 - Masny, D., & Cole, D. R. (2009). Multiple literacies theory: A Deleuzian perspective. Rotterdam Sense Publishers.
- Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822383574
- National Center for Visual Analytics. (2017). Statistics eXplorer. Retrieved 2019-02-06 from:
https://ncva.itn.liu.se/explorer?sc=true&l=en . - Olsson, L. M. (2012). Eventicizing Curriculum: Learning to Read and Write through Becoming a Citizen of the World. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(1).
- Olsson, L. M. (2013). Taking Children’s Questions Seriously: The need for creative thought. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(2), 230–253. DOI: 10.2304/gsch.2013.3.3.230
- Purchase, H. C. (2014). Twelve years of diagrams research. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 25(2), 57–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2013.11.004
- Reynolds, R., & Vinterek, M. (2013). Globalization and classroom practice: Insights on learning about the world in Swedish and Australian schools. Nordidactica, 1, 104–130.
- Roberts, S., & Philip, R. (2006). The grammar of visual design, 22(2). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1299
- Rosling, H., Rönnlund, A. R., & Rosling, O. (2007, 2004). New software brings statistics beyond the eye. Paper presented at the OECD World Forum on Key Indicators, Teatro Massimo, Palermo, Italia.
- Roy, K. (2005). On Sense and Nonsense: Looking Beyond the Literacy Wars. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(1), 99–111. DOI: 10.1111/j.0309-8249.2005.00422.x
- Roy, K. (2008).
Deleuzian Murmurs: Education and Communication . In: Semetsky, I. (Ed.), Nomadic Education. Variations on a Theme by Deleuze and Guattari, 159–170. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. - Sabol, V., Kienreich, W., Muhr, M., Klieber, W., & Granitzer, M. (2009). Visual Knowledge Discovery in Dynamic Enterprise Text Repositories. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Information Visualisation, IV Barcelona, Spain. DOI: 10.1109/IV.2009.35
- Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
- Shah, P., Freedman, E. G., & Vekiri, I. (2005).
The Comprehension of Quantitative Information in Graphical Displays . In: Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, 426–476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610448.012 - Sofkova Hashemi, S., Petersen, A-L., & Bunting, L. (2013). En elev en dator i grundskolans tidigare år: En analys av didaktiska förhållningssätt utifrån perspektiv på lärarens ledarskap, texter och textpraktiker, samt språklärande. Trollhättan: Högskolan Väst.
- Sørensen, E. (2011). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Stafford, B., & Terpak, F. (2001).
Revealing Technologies/Magical Domains’ in a Box to Images on a Screenh . In: Stafford, B., & Terpak, F. (Eds.), Devices of Wonder: From the World in a Box to Images on a Screen, 1–109. Los angeles: Getty Research Institute. - Stenliden, L. (2014). Visual Storytelling Interacting in School Learning Conditions in the Social Science Classroom. (20), Linköping: Linköping University. Retrieved from:
http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?parentRecord=diva2%3A410571&pid=diva2%3A719298&dswid=9340 . DOI: 10.3384/diss.diva-106885 - Stenliden, L. (2015). Visual Analytics in K12 Education – Emerging Dimensions of Complexity. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9(2), 663–671.
- Stenliden, L. (2018). Geovisual Analytics in School: Challenges for the Didactic Design of the Classroom. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(3), 178–185. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.3.1030
- Stenliden, L., Nissen, J., & Bodén, U. (2017). Innovative didactic designs: Visual analytics and visual literacy in school. Journal of Visual Literacy, 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/1051144X.2017.1404800
- Stewig, J. W. (2010). First Graders Talk About Paintings. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(5), 309–316. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1994.9941259
- Stokes, S. T. S. (2002). Visual Literacy in Teaching and Learning: A Literature Perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1(1).
- Strathern, M. (1996). Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(3), 517–535. DOI: 10.2307/3034901
- TechSmith, C. (2010).
Camtasia Studio . In: (Vol. 7.1). Okemos, Michigan. - Tomaseviae-Daneeviae, M. (1999). Do you “speak” the visual language? Paper presented at the InSEA 30th World Congress “Cultures and Transitions” Brisbane, Australia.
- Tomaszewski, B., & MacEachren, A. M. (2012). Geovisual analytics to support crisis management: Information foraging for geo-historical context. Information Visualization, 11(4), 339–359. DOI: 10.1177/1473871612456122
- Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics Education [Elektronisk resurs]. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5
- Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphic Press.
- Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009).
Thinking with sketches: Tools for Innovation . In: Markman, A. B. A. W. K. L. (Ed.), The Science Behind the Practical Methods that Drive Innovation, 75–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Williams, T. L. (2007). “Reading” the Painting: Exploring Visual Literacy in the Primary Grades. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 636–642. DOI: 10.1598/RT.60.7.4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.108 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 51
Submitted on: May 1, 2018
Accepted on: Mar 7, 2019
Published on: Apr 16, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2019 Ulrika Bodén, Linnéa Stenliden, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.