Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Didactical Design Principles to Apply When Introducing Student-generated Digital Multimodal Representations in the Science Classroom Cover

Didactical Design Principles to Apply When Introducing Student-generated Digital Multimodal Representations in the Science Classroom

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 2749. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20265
  2. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2017). Social Semiotics in University Physics Education. In: Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fischer, H. E. (eds.), Multiple Representations in Physics Education, 95122. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_5
  3. Carolan, J., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2008). Using representations for teaching and learning in science. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(1), 1823.
  4. diSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293331. DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
  5. Dolin, J. (2005). Naturfagsdidaktiske problematikker. MONA, 1, 723.
  6. Gunel, M., & Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2016). Modal Representations and their Role in the Learning Process: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 109126. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2016.1.0054
  7. Hand, B., McDermott, M., & Prain, V. (2016). Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16450-2
  8. Hoban, G., & Nielsen, W. (2010). The 5 Rs: A new teaching approach to encourage slowmations (student-generated animations) of science concepts. Teaching Science, 56(3), 3338.
  9. Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and Learning about Force with a Representational Focus: Pedagogy and Teacher Change. Research in Science Education, 40, 528. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9
  10. Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In: Gilbert, J. K. (ed.), Visualizations in Science Education, 121146. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_8
  11. Kress, K., & Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203619728
  12. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  13. Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In: Martin, J. R., & Veel, R. (eds.), Reading science, 87113. London, UK: Routledge.
  14. Murcia, K. (2010). Multimodal representations in primary science: What’s offered by interactive whiteboard technology. Teaching Science, 56(1), 2329.
  15. Prain, V., & Hand, B. (2016). Learning Science Through Learning to Use Its Languages. In: Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom, 110. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16450-2_1
  16. Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning Through Constructing Representations in Science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 27512773. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
  17. Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ and Students’ use of Multi-modal Representations of Concepts in Primary Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 18431866. DOI: 10.1080/09500690600718294
  18. Søndergaard, K. D., & Hasse, C. (2012). Teknologiforsta?else – på skoler og hospitaler. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  19. Tang, K., et al. (2014). An integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning – Making in Science Education. Science Education, 98(2), 305326. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21099
  20. Tippett, C. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725746. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435
  21. Tytler, R., et al. (2007). Representational Issues in Students Learning About Evaporation. Research in Science Education, 37, 313331. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-006-9028-3
  22. Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2012). Learning from and through representations in science. In: Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (eds.), Second international handbook of science education, 145155. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_12
  23. Wallace, C. S., Hand, B. M., & Prain, V. (2004). Writing and learning in the science classroom. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2018-6
  24. Wu, H.-K., & Puntambekar, S. (2012). Pedagogical Affordances of Multiple External Representations in Scientific Processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 754767. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.100 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 122
Submitted on: Feb 23, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 12, 2018
Published on: Dec 14, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Mette Fredslund Andersen, Nicolai Munksby, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.