Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is the Samogitian Dialect Going to Die Out? Implications of Showing Pride in Being a Samogitian and Attitudes Towards Samogitianness on Samogitian Facebook Pages Cover

Is the Samogitian Dialect Going to Die Out? Implications of Showing Pride in Being a Samogitian and Attitudes Towards Samogitianness on Samogitian Facebook Pages

Open Access
|May 2017

References

  1. Bajarūnaitė, A., & Liauksminas, S. (2013). Lietuvių tarmės ne nyksta, o keičiasi”. Retrieved from http://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/kalba_vilnius/32/17393#wowzaplaystart=5795000&wowzaplayduration=1101000.
  2. Balode, L., & Holvoet, A. (2001). The Lithuanian language and its dialects. In O. Dahl & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (Eds.) Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact (pp. 41–80). Amsterdam: Jon Benjamins.
  3. Baltėnas, A., & Ivanauskaitė-Šeibutienė, V. (2012). Žemaičiai=: Samogitians: Gyvenimai ir Šventės. Vilnius: R. Paknio leidykla.
  4. Baranauskienė, V., & Krupickaitė, D. (2012). Lietuvos miestų gyventojų tarminės regioninės savimonės ypatumai (sociolingvistinio tyrimo duomenimis). Taikomoji kalbotyra, 10. Retrieved from http://taikomojikalbotyra.lt.azalija.serveriai.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Baranauskiene_Krupickaite_Lietuvosmiestai_2012PDF.pdf.
  5. Baranauskienė, V., & Krupickaitė, D. (2013). Regioniniai kalbų vartojimo Lietuvos miestuose ypatumai. In M. Ramonienė (Ed.), Miestai ir kalbos II: sociolingvistinis Lietuvos žemėlapis (pp. 23–54). Vilnius: Vilnius UP.
  6. Crystal, D. (2000). Language Play. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multiculturalism and language. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics (pp. 48–50). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
  8. Girdenis, A., & Pabrėža, J. (1998). Žemaičių rašyba. Vilnius and Šiauliai: Žemaičių kultūros draugijos redakcija.
  9. Grossberg, L. (1996). Identity and cultural studies – Is that all there is? In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 87–107). London: Sage.
  10. Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.
  11. Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (Eds.). (1995). Social movements and culture (social movements, protest, and contention). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  12. Kalnius, P. (2012). Žemaičiai: XX a. – XXI a. pradžia. Vilnius: Mintis.
  13. Kamusella, T. (2001). Language as an instrument of nationalism in Central Europe. Nations and Nationalism, 2, 235–252.10.1111/1469-8219.00014
  14. Kliukienė, R. (2014). Kalbėjimas su tėvais tarmiškai ir gyventojų požiūris į tarmes Žemaitijos miestuose (kiekybinė analizė). Taikomoji kalbotyra, 5.
  15. Law On the State Language. (1995). State Commission of the Lithuanian Language. Retrieved from http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter/www_tv.show?id=20034,1.
  16. Nayar, P. K. (2010). An introduction to new media and cyberculture. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  17. Nettle, D., & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing voices. New York: Oxford UP.
  18. Ramonienė, M. (2013). Tarmės socialinė vertė: Lietuvos miestų jaunimo kalbinės nuostatos. Taikomoji kalbotyra, 2
  19. Ramonienė, M. (Ed.). (2010). Miestai ir kalbos. Vilnius: Vilnius UP.
  20. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press.
  21. Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2006). The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics Review, 2, 92–97.10.1177/174701610600200303
  22. Rosenberg, Å. (2010). Virtual World Research Ethics and the Private/Public Distinction. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 30–37.
  23. Subačius, G. (2002). Two types of standard language history in Europe. Res Balticae, 8, 131–150.
  24. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  25. Vaicekauskienė, L. (2011). Language ‘nationalization’: One hundred years of standard Lithuanian. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.) Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe (pp. 105–112). Oslo: Novus.
  26. Vaicekauskienė, L. (2012). Language standards in a post-modern speech community: Cosmetic touch ups and ongoing changes. Lituanus, 58, 58–72
  27. Vandergriff, I., & Fuchs, C. (2009). Does CMC promote language play? Exploring humor in two modalities. CALICO Journal, 27, 26–47.10.11139/cj.27.1.26-47
  28. Wilbur, S. B. (2000). An archaeology of cyberspace: Virtuality, community, identity. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The Cybercultures Reader (pp. 45–55). New York: Routledge.
  29. Zimbra, D., Abbasi, A., & Chen, H. (2010). A cyber-archaelogy approach to social movement research: Framework and case study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 48–70.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01531.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sm-2017-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2335-2027 | Journal ISSN: 2335-2019
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 97
Published on: May 22, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Vilma Mikašytė, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Languages
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.