Metrological Software Test for Simulating the Method of Determining the Thermocouple Error in Situ During Operation

Jingliang Chen; Jun Su; Orest Kochan; Mariana Levkiv

doi:10.1515/msr-2018-0008

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Metrological Software Test for Simulating the Method of Determining the Thermocouple Error in Situ During Operation

Measurement Science Review

Volume 18 (2018): Issue 2 (April 2018)

By: Jingliang Chen, Jun Su, Orest Kochan and Mariana Levkiv

Open Access

|Apr 2018

Abstract

The simplified metrological software test (MST) for modeling the method of determining the thermocouple (TC) error in situ during operation is considered in the paper. The interaction between the proposed MST and a temperature measuring system is also reflected in order to study the error of determining the TC error in situ during operation. The modelling studies of the random error influence of the temperature measuring system, as well as interference magnitude (both the common and normal mode noises) on the error of determining the TC error in situ during operation using the proposed MST, have been carried out. The noise and interference of the order of 5-6 μV cause the error of about 0.2-0.3°C. It is shown that high noise immunity is essential for accurate temperature measurements using TCs.

References

[1] Józwik, J., Mika, D. (2015). Diagnostics of workpiece surface condition based on cutting tool vibrations during machining. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9 (26), 57-65.10.12913/22998624/2365
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Glowacz, A., Glowacz, Z. (2016). Diagnostics of stator faults of the single-phase induction motor using thermal images, MoASoS and selected classifiers. Measurement, 93, 86-93.10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Fraczyk, A., Kucharski, J. (2017). Surface temperature control of a rotating cylinder heated by moving inductors. Applied Thermal Engineering, 125, 767-779.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.025
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Krolczyk, G.M., Maruda, R.W., Nieslony, P., Wieczorowski, M. (2016). Surface morphology analysis of Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) in Clean Production using the Power Spectral Density. Measurement, 94, 464-470.10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.023
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Kočí, V., Maděra, J., Jerman, M., Trník, A., Černý, R. (2014). Determination of the equivalent thermal conductivity of complex material systems with large-scale heterogeneities. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 86, 365-373.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.07.020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Novák, M., Náprstková, N., Józwik, J. (2015). Analysis of the surface profile and its material share during the grinding inconel 718 alloy. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9 (26), 41-48.10.12913/22998624/2363
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Wang, W.L., Zhang, H., Du, X.J., Sun, Y.Y. (2016). PCB-integrated thin film thermocouples for transient temperature measurement. Electronics Letters, 52 (13), 1140-1141.10.1049/el.2016.0693
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Mikhalieva, M., Hots, N., Mykyychuk, M., Dzikovska, Y. (2017). Use electric and acoustic technologies for automated control of water. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Selected Papers from the International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies. Springer, Vol. 512, 293-303.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Feldshtein, E., Józwik, J., Legutko, J. (2016). The influence of the conditions of emulsion mist formation on the surface roughness of AISI 1045 steel after finish turning. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 10 (30), 144-149.10.12913/22998624/62773
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Mellal, I., Laghrouche, M., Tien Bui, H. (2017). Field programmable gate array (FPGA) respiratory monitoring system using a flow microsensor and an accelerometer. Measurement Science Review, 17 (2), 61-67.10.1515/msr-2017-0008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Ferrero, A., Scotti, V. (2013). Forensic metrology: A new application field for measurement experts across techniques and ethics. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 16 (1), 14-17.10.1109/MIM.2013.6417051
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Birch, J. (2003). Benefit of legal metrology for the economy and society. A study for the International Committee of Legal Metrology. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_e/e002-e03.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Webster, J. (1999). Measurement, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook. CRC Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Childs, P.R.N., Greenwood, J.R., Long, C.A. (2000). Review of temperature measurement. Review of Scientific Instruments, 71, 2959-2978.10.1063/1.1305516
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Kochan, O., Kochan, R., Bojko, O., Chyrka, M. (2007). Temperature measurement system based on thermocouple with controlled temperature field. In 4th IEEE Workshop on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS 2007), 6-8 September 2007. IEEE, 47-51.10.1109/IDAACS.2007.4488370
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Jun, S., Kochan, O., Kochan, V., Wang, C. (2016). Development and investigation of the method for compensating thermoelectric inhomogeneity error. International Journal of Thermophysics, 37 (1).10.1007/s10765-015-2025-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Maruda, R.W., Krolczyk, G.M., Nieslony, P., Wojciechowski, S., Michalski, M., Legutko, S. (2016). The influence of the cooling conditions on the cutting tool wear and the chip formation mechanism. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 24 (1), 107-115.10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.08.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Glowacz, A., Glowacz, A., Glowacz, Z. (2015). Recognition of thermal images of direct current motor with application of area perimeter vector and bayes classifier. Measurement Science Review, 15 (3), 119-126.10.1515/msr-2015-0018
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Stadnyk, B., Yatsyshyn, S., Skoropad, P. (2012). Research in nanothermometry. Part 4. Amorphous alloys of thermo-resistive thermometry. Sensors and Transducers, 141 (6), 1-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Machin, G., Bojkovski, J., del Campo, D. et al. (2014). A European roadmap for thermometry. International Journal of Thermophysics, 35 (3-4), 385-394.10.1007/s10765-013-1554-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] Palenčár, R., Sopkuliak, P., Palenčár, J., Ďuriš, S., Suroviak, E., Halaj, M. (2017). Application of Monte Carlo Method for evaluation of uncertainties of ITS-90 by Standard Platinum Resistance Thermometer. Measurement Science Review, 17 (3), 108-116.10.1515/msr-2017-0014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] Park, R.M. (1993). Manual on the Use of Thermocouples in Temperature Measurement. ASTM International.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] Smalcerz, A., Przylucki, R. (2013). Impact of electromagnetic field upon temperature measurement of induction heated charges. International Journal of Thermophysics, 34 (4), 667-679.10.1007/s10765-013-1423-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] Kochan, R., Kochan, O., Chyrka, M., Vasylkiv, N. Precision data acquisition (DAQ) module with remote reprogramming. In IEEE Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS 2005), 5-7 September, 2005. IEEE, 279-282.10.1109/IDAACS.2005.282986
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[25] Duan, Q. (2009). Research of a cold end temperature compensation for thermal couple. In IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics (ICAL '09), 5-7 August, 2009. IEEE, 921-924.10.1109/ICAL.2009.5262789
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[26] Körtvélyessy, L. (1998). Thermoelement Praxis. Essen, Germany: Vulkan-Verlag. (in German).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[27] Sachenko, A., Kochan, V., Turchenko, V. (2000). Sensor drift prediction using neural networks. In International Workshop on Virtual and Intelligent Measurement Systems (VIMS 2000), 29-30 April, 2000, 88-92.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[28] Rogelberg, N., Nuzhnov, A., Pokrovskaya, G. et al. (1969). The stability of the chromel-alumel thermocouples’ thermoelectric power at temperatures up to 1200°C. Investigation of alloys for thermocouples. In Proceedings of the Giprotsvetmetobrabotka.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[29] Sloneker, K.C. (2009). Thermocouple inhomogeneity. Ceramic Industry, 159 (4), 13-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[30] Vasylkiv, N., Kochan, O., Kochan, R., Chyrka, M. (2009). The control system of the profile of temperature field. In IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems (IDAACS 2009), 21-23 September, 2009. IEEE, 201-206.10.1109/IDAACS.2009.5342994
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[31] Jun, S., Kochan, O., Kochan, R. (2016). Thermocouples with built-in self-testing. International Journal of Thermophysics, 37 (4).10.1007/s10765-016-2044-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[32] Woolley, J.W., Woodbury, K.A. (2009). Using computational models to account for thermocouple conduction error in cast metal/mold interfacial heat transfer experiments. In 113th Metalcasting Congress, 7-10 April 2009, Vol. 117, 31-40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[33] Shu, C., Kochan, O. (2013). Method of thermocouples self verification on operation place. Sensors & Transducers, 160 (12), 55-61.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[34] Vasylkiv, N. (2010). Improvement of metrology software test in computer systems of temperature measurement. International Journal of Computing, 9 (2), 175-182.10.47839/ijc.9.2.710
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[35] Jun, S., Kochan, O., Levkiv, M. (2017). Metrological software test for studying the method of thermocouple error determination during operation. In 11th International Conference on Measurement (Measurement 2017), 29-31 May, 2017. Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute of Measurement Science SAS, 171-174.10.23919/MEASUREMENT.2017.7983563
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[36] International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[37] Informa USA, Inc. Electronic Design. http://www.electronicdesign.com/analog/when-1-1-3-db-averaging-adc-channels-improve-nsd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2018-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 52 - 58

Submitted on: Sep 22, 2017

Accepted on: Mar 20, 2018

Published on: Apr 4, 2018

Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: Volume open

Keywords:

Thermocouple,

determination of TC error in situ,

determination of TC error during operation,

metrological software test,

simulation of measuring channel

Related subjects:

Engineering,

Electrical engineering,

Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2018 Jingliang Chen, Jun Su, Orest Kochan, Mariana Levkiv, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 18 (2018): Issue 2 (April 2018)