Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Verification of the Indicating Measuring Instruments Taking into Account their Instrumental Measurement Uncertainty Cover

Verification of the Indicating Measuring Instruments Taking into Account their Instrumental Measurement Uncertainty

Measurement Science Review
Volume 17 (2017): Issue 6 (December 2017)
By: Igor Zakharov,  Pavel Neyezhmakov and  Olesia Botsiura  
Open Access
|Nov 2017

References

  1. [1] International Organization for Standardization. (2005). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] EURACHEM/CITAC Working Group. (2012). Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. EURACHEM / CITAC Guide CG4, Third Edition. ISBN 978-0-948926-30-3.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Statistical methods - Guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements - Part 1: General principles. ISO 10576-1:2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] URACHEM/CITAC Working Group. (2007). Use of uncertainty information in compliance assessment. EURACHEM / CITAC Guide, First Edition.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] International Organization for Standardization. (2013). Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment - Part 1: Decision rules for proving conformity or nonconformity with specifications. ISO 14253-1:2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Eurolab. (2008). Determination of conformance with specifications or limit values with particular reference to measurement uncertainties - possible strategies. EUROLAB ”Cook Book” - Doc No. 8.0. www.eurolab.org/documents/Cookbook_No_8.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2012). Evaluation of measurement data - The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. JCGM 106:2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2017). The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment decisions in legal metrology. OIML G 19, Edition 2017 (E).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] EA Laboratory Committee. (2013). Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement In Calibration. EA-4/02 M: 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” - Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Statistical methods - Guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements - Part 1: General principles. ISO 10576-1:2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msr-2017-0033 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 269 - 272
Submitted on: Sep 9, 2017
|
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2017
|
Published on: Nov 22, 2017
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Probability of compliance,
uncertainty of measurement,
calibration,
verification,
uncertainty budget,
maximum permissible error
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2017 Igor Zakharov, Pavel Neyezhmakov, Olesia Botsiura, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2017): Issue 6 (December 2017)Next article