Environmental Business as a New Ideologeme of Social Progress: Social and Philosophical Analysis

Severyn-Mrachkovska, Liudmyla

doi:10.1515/mosr-2019-0014

Abstract

The article presents a social and philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of environmental business as a new ideologeme of social progress. The essence, reasons of occurrence, conditions and directions of the activity of the ecological business in the modern world are analysed. It is concluded that the development of the environmental business is a determinant of the process of the greening of the economy, contributes to the expansion of the environmental thinking of the society and serves as a necessary condition for the sustainable development of the country and the world in general. The environmental business is a vivid example of the interaction between morality and economy.

References

1. 1999/2000 World Development Report. (2000). On the Threshold of the 21st Century. – M.: All World Publishing House, World Bank.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Atfield, R. (1990). The Ethics of Environmental Responsibility // The Global Problems and Universal Values. – M.: Progress, pp. 203–257.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Bhattarai, K. (2019). Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Organic Vegetables: Empirical Evidence from Nepal // Economics and Sociology. Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 132–146. doi: 10.14254 /2071-789X. 2019 / 12-3 / 9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Bilyavsky, G. A., Butchenko, L. I., Navrotsky, V. M. (2002). The Ecology Assessments: Theory and Workshop: A Tutorial. – K.: Libra.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Birnbacher, D. (1982). A Priority Rule for Environmental Ethics // Environmental Ethics. Vol. 4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Bobylev, S. N. (1993). The Greening of the Economic Development: A Tutorial. – Moscow: MSU, p. 33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Boon, E. (2001). Creating Environmental Management Systems // The Mechanism of the Regulation of Economy, the Economy of Nature Management, the Economy of Enterprise and the Organization of Production. No. 1-2, pp. 25–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Boronos, V. N., Sklyar, I. D. (2001). The Cyclicity of the Development of Economic System and the Tools of Ecologization of the Long-Term Development // The Mechanism of the Regulation of Economy, the Economy of Nature Management, the Economy of Enterprise and the Organization of Production. No. 1-2, pp. 54–56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Callicot, B. J. (1984). Non-Anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics / B. J. Callicot // American Philosophica Quarterly. No. 21. p. 299.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Callicott, B. (1990). The Asian Tradition and the prospects for Environmental Ethics: The Propedeutics // The global problems and the human values. – M.: Progress, pp. 308–327.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Callicott, B. (1999). The Environmental Values and Ethics // The Humanitarian Ecological Journal. No. 1(2), pp. 40–67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Deutsch, E. (1970). Vedanta and Ecology // Indian Philosophical Annual. Vol. 7, pp. 79–88.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Dmytruk, O. Yu. (2004). The Ecological Tourism: The Modern Management and Marketing Concepts: A Tutorial. – K.: Alterpres. p. 192 Internet access: , [accessed August 20, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Galchinsky, A. (2000). To Restore the Capacity of the State // The Economy of Ukraine. No. 8, p. 8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Golubets, M. A. (1997). From the Biosphere to the Sociosphere. – Lviv: Polly.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Ilinykh, I. A. (2009). The Environmental Ethics: A Tutorial. – Gorno-Altaisk: RIO GAGU.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Ilyashenko, S., Lander, G., Melnyk, V. (1998). The Research of the Ecological Markets in Ukraine // The Economics of Nature Management. – K.: Naukova dumka.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Inozemtsev, V. L. (2003). The Environmental Issues and the Economic Feasibility. The Crisis of the Kyoto Agreements and the Problem of the Global Climate Warming // At the Turn of the Epochs. The Economic Tendencies and their Non-Economic Consequences / Inozemtsev, V. L. – M.: “Ekonomyka” Publishing House, pp. 491–492.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Kaygili, S., Sinanoglu, D., Aksoy, E., Sasmaz, A. (2018). Geoturism: Some Examples from Turkey // Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 79–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.15421/11180910.15421/111809
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. King, A., Schneider, B. (1991). The First Global Revolution. – M.: Progress: “Progress – Panagya”.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Kochergyn, A. N. (2015). The Ecological Сulture as a Factor of the “sustainable development” of a Society: Problems, opportunities, Realities // The Forest Herald. – Mytishchi: MGUL Publishing House. No. 4, pp. 33–36.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Kolosova, O. Yu. (2008). The Ecological Imperative as a Social and Cultural Phenomenon // The Humanities and Social and Economic sciences. No. 2, pp. 39–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Kononenko, V. I., Veklych, O. O., Shablysta, L. M., et al. (2002). The Mechanism of the Structural Shifts in the Economy of Ukraine. – K.: Inst. of Economics of NASU.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Koziuk, V., Dluhopolskyi, O., Farion, A., Dluhopolska, T. (2018). Crony Sectors as a Barrier to Economic Well-Being and Ecologization (Case of Ukraine) // Economics and Sociology. Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 113–132. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X. 2018 /11-3 /710.14254/2071-789X
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Krutyakova, V. I. (2001). The Market Mechanisms of the Development of Ecological Entrepreneurship in Ukraine // The Ecological Innovations. No. 12, pp. 240–245.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Krysachenko, V. S., Krimsky, S. V., Golubets, M. A., et. al. (1991). The Ecology and the Culture. – K.: Naukova dumka.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Liseyev, I. K. (2009). The Ecological Ethics in the Conditions of New Ecological Culture // The Philosophy and the Ethics: A Collection of the Scientific Works. – M.: Alpha-M, pp. 723–736.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Markovych, D. J., Zhukov, V. I., Bhanba-Cerera, V. R. (1998). The Social Ecology: A Tutorial. – M.: Publishing house of MGSU “Soyuz”.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Melnyk, L. G., Sabadash, V. V., Kalashnyk, S. D. (2001). The Strategy of Economic Growth and the Problem of Environmental Safety // The Mechanism of the Regulation of Economy, the Economy of Nature Management, the Economy of Enterprise and the Organization of Production. No. 1-2, pp. 25–37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Melnyk, L. G., Skokov, S. A. (2001). The Resource Conservation as a Direction of Nature Management // The Mechanism of the Regulation of Economy, the Economy of Nature Management, the Economy of Enterprise and the Organization of Production. No. 1-2, pp. 70–73.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Mikhailuk, S. A. (2006). The Theoretical Origins of the Environmental Ethics // The Current Philosophical and Cultural Problems of the Present: A Collection of Scientific Works. Issue 17. Pp. 176–183.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Mikhnevych, S. (2004). The Liberalization of the Trade in Agricultural Products and the Competition Policy // The Society and the Economics. No. 5-6, pp. 215–224.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Mitych, L. (2015). The Ecological Upbringing and the Education in the Function of Nature Protection // The Forest Herald. No. 4, pp. 43–48.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Musová, Z., Musa, H., Ludhova, L. (2018). Environmentally Responsible Purchasing in Slovakia // Economics and Sociology. Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 289–305. doi: 10.14254 /2071-789X. 2018 / 11-4 / 19
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Pankiv, N. Ye., Roik, O. R. (2019). Green Ways as a Form of Sustainable Tourism Development in Lviv Region (on the Example of Yavoriv District) // Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. Vol.28, No 1, pp. 159–172. doi: https: 10.15421/111917
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Pavlov, A. N. (2004). The Basics of Environmental Culture. – St. Petersburg: Polytechnic.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Pavlova, T. N. (1997). The Bioethics in the High School. – M.: MGAVMB by K.I. Skryabyn.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Porter, M. E. (2000). The Competition: Trans. with English: Uch. pos. – M.: Ed. Williams House.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Roderick, N. (1989). The Rights of Nature. – The University of Wisconsin Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Rogozha, M. M. (2015). The Ecological Ethics in Civil Society: The Theoretical and Applied Aspects // The Forest Herald. – Mytishchi: MGUL Publishing House. No. 4, pp. 64–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. Romanchuk, Y. The Myths and the Facts about the Concept of Monopoly. Internet access: [accessed August 25, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. Sennitskaya, L. V. (2015). The Role of the Education in the Formation of the Ecological Culture // Forest Herald. No. 4, pp. 70–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Sidoryna, T. Yu. (2003). The Crisis Philosophy: A Tutorial / T. Yu. Sidoryna. – M.: Flint: Science.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. Sonco, S., Kiseliov, Yu., Polovka, S. (2018). About the Modern Concept of Environment // Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 346–356. doi: https://doi.org/10.15421/11185910.15421/111859
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
45. Sosurko, Yu. V., Zhuykov, V. Ya., Zolotaryova, L. S., Petergerya, Yu. S. (2000). The Preparation and the Conducting of the Leasing Operations in the Sphere of Ecology. The Practical recommendations. – K.: Avers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
46. The Energy. History, Present and Future. Internet access: http://energetika.in.ua/en/books/book-5/part-1/section-2/2-8> [accessed August 7, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
47. The Entrepreneurs about a Business: The Most Striking Quotes of 2011. Internet access: [accessed August 7, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
48. The Increasing Energy Efficiency and the Stimulating the Use of Renewable Energy in Agricultural and Food and Other Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of Ukraine. Internet access: [accessed August 7, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
49. Tregobchuk, V., Veklych, O. (1997). The Need for an Ecological and Economic Model of Market Reforms in Ukraine // Economy of Ukraine. No. 4, p. 22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
50. Ursul, A. D. (1990). The Prospects of the Environmental Development. – M.: Science.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
51. White, L., Jr. (1990). Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis // Global Problems and Universal Values. – M.: Progress, pp. 188–202.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
52. Yatskov, V. (1994). The Problems of the Resource Saving // Economy of Ukraine. No. 3, p. 46.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
53. Yavorska, V. V., Hevko, I. V., Sych, V. A., Kolomiyets, K. V. (2018). The Main Components of the Formation of Recreational and Tourism Activity // Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 148–155. doi: 10.15421/11184010.15421/111840
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
54. Zeidfoodym, P. H., Gazizullyn, N. F. (1992). The Social and Ecological Motivation of the Entrepreneurial Activity // The Sociological Research. No. 9, pp. 65–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
55. Zhulavsky, A. Yu. (2001). The Ecologization of the External Environment of the Enterprise // The Mechanism of the Regulation of Economy, the Economy of Nature Management, the Economy of Enterprise and the Organization of Production. No. 1-2, pp. 38–49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Environmental Business as a New Ideologeme of Social Progress: Social and Philosophical Analysis

Abstract

Paradigm

My account