References
- Andrews, J. and Smith D.C. (1996), “In search of marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 174-187.
- Baskin, E., Wakslak, C.J., Trope, Y and Novemsky, N. (2014), “Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 169-182.
- Belk, R.W. (1979), “Gift-giving behavior”, in Sheth, J. (ed.) Research in Marketing, Vol. 2, pp. 95-126, JAI press, Greenwich, CT.
- Belk, R.W. and Coon, G.S. (1991), “Can't buy me love: Dating, money, and gifts”, ACR North American Advances.
- Buhrmester, M. Kwang, T. and Gosling, S.D. (2011), “Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 3-5.
- Caplow, T. (1982), “Christmas gifts and kin networks”, American Sociological Review, pp. 383-392.10.2307/2094994
- Cobb, R. A., DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2013), “Implicit theories of relationships and close relationship violence: does believing your relationship can grow relate to lower perpetration of violence?”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 279-290.
- Dweck, C. S. (2000), Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Psychology Press. Philadelphia, PA.
- Elliott, E. S. and Dweck, C.S. (1988), “Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54 No.1, pp. 5-12.
- Gino, F. and Flynn, F.J. (2011), “Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 915-922. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.015
- Goodman, J.K., Cryder, C. E. and Cheema, A. (2013), “Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 26, pp. 213-224.10.1002/bdm.1753
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998), Multivariate data analysis, Vol. 5, No. 3, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hayes, A.F. (2013), Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, Guilford Press, New York.
- Hui, C.M., Bond, M.H. and Molden, D.C. (2012), “Why do (n’t) your partner’s efforts at selfimprovement make you happy? An implicit theories perspective”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 101-113.
- Knee, C.R. (1998), “Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 360-370.
- Knee, C.R., Patrick, H. and Lonsbary, C. (2003), “Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 41-55.
- Knee, C.R., Nanayakkara, A., Vietor, N.A., Neighbors, C. and Patrick, H., (2001), “Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal?”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 808-819.
- Liu, W. (2008), “Focusing on desirability: The effect of decision interruption and suspension on preferences”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35 No.4, pp. 640-652.
- Mittal, B. (1994), “An Integrated framework for relating diverse consumer characteristics to supermarket coupon redemption”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 533-44.10.2307/3151881
- Nguyen, H.P. and Munch, J.M. (2011), “Romantic gift giving as chore or pleasure: The effects of attachment orientations on gift giving perceptions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 113-118.10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.006
- Prendergast, C. and Stole L. (2001), “The non-monetary nature of gifts”, European Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 1793-1810.
- Rai, D., Lin, C.W. and Ierlan, M.T. (2016), “The influence of scheduling style on assortment size”, Management and Marketing, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 553-565.
- Research and Markets (2015), “Gifting report 2015”, available at: www.researchandmarkets.com/research/hq2wt4/gifting_report (accessed October, 6, 2017).
- Roscoe, J.T. (1975) Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edition, Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York.
- Ruth, J.A., Brunel, F.F. and Otnes, C.C. (2004), “An investigation of the power of emotions in relationship realignment: The gift recipient's perspective”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 29-52.
- Sherry, J.F. (1983), “Gift giving in anthropological perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 157-168.
- Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2010), “Construal-level theory of psychological distance”, Psychological Review, Vol. 117, No. 2, pp. 440-463.
- Ward, M.K. and Broniarczyk, S.M. (2011), “It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 38, No.1, pp. 164-181.
- Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G. and Chen, Q. (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 197-206.
- Zuberman, G. and Lynch, J.G. (2005), “Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 23-37.