Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Transactional Distance Dialogic Interactions and Student Satisfaction in a Multi Institutional Blended Learning Environment Cover

Transactional Distance Dialogic Interactions and Student Satisfaction in a Multi Institutional Blended Learning Environment

Open Access
|Jan 2018

References

  1. 1. Bernath, U., & Rubin, E. (2002). Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.
  2. 2. Bischoff, W., Bisconer, S., Kooker, B., & Woods, L. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 4-19.
  3. 3. Bothwell, E. (2016, November 10). US blended learning students ‘least engaged with teaching’. Times Higher Education [blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/us-blended-learning-students-least-engagedteaching
  4. 4. Chen, Y., & Willits, F. (1999). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 45-59.
  5. 5. Chen, Y. (2001a). Transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environments: A factor analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(4), 327-338.
  6. 6. Chen, Y. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in the World Wide Web learning environment: A factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 459-470.
  7. 7. Congress, A. (2015). A study of instructional strategies and their affects on transactional distance in online learning environments. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
  8. 8. Goel, L., Zhang, P., & Templeton, M. (2012). Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1122-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.020.
  9. 9. Grosjean, G., & Sork, T. J. (2007). Going online: Uploading learning to the virtual classroom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007(113), 13-24.
  10. 10. Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C., & Teng, T.L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414-427.
  11. 11. Fullwood, E. D. (2015). Influence of the use of online communications media on perceptions of transactional distance and student satisfaction in a hybrid education program. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
  12. 12. Horzum, M. (2011). Developing transactional distance scale and examining transactional distance perception of blended learning students in terms of different variables. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1582-1587.
  13. 13. Jung, L, Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
  14. 14. Kassandrinou, A., Angelaki, C. & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students: How does it affect the learning process? European Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 17(1), 26-42.
  15. 15. Larsson, S., Boud, D., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Walters, S., & Sork, T. (2005). Confronting globalisation: Learning from intercontinental collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 61-71.
  16. 16. Lewis, J. L. M. (2011). The Computer Ate My Classroom: Assessing Student Interactions, Perceived Learning, and Satisfaction in Online Community College Career Technical Education Courses. The University of Southern Mississippi, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  17. 17. Mbwesa, J. K. (2014). Transactional distance as a predictor of perceived learner satisfaction in distance learning courses: A case study of bachelor of education arts program, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 176-188. doi: 10.11114/jets.v2i2.291
  18. 18. Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (Vol. 1, pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.
  19. 19. Moore, M. G. (1999). Editorial: Institutional restructuring: Is distance education like retailing? The American Journal of Distance Education,13(1), 17.
  20. 20. Smith, S., Smith, S., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37-46.
  21. 21. Strachota, E. (2003). Student satisfaction in online courses: An analysis of the impact of learner-content, learner-instructor, learner-learner, and learner-technology interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Ann-Arbor, Michigan: UMI Publishing.
  22. 22. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22, 306-331.
  23. 23. Wengrowicz, N., & Offir, B. (2013). Teachers’ Perceptions of Transactional Distance in Different Teaching Environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 111-121. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923647.2013.773701
  24. 24. Wengrowicz, N., Dori, Y.J., & Dori, D. (2014). Transactional distance in an undergraduate project-based systems modelling course. Knowledge-Based Systems, 71, 41-51.
  25. 25. Xiaoxia, H., Aruna, C., DePaolo, C., Cribbs, J., & Simmons, L. (2015). Measuring transactional distance in web-based learning environments: An initial instrument development. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 30(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2015.1065720
  26. 26. Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction. PhD thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 153
Published on: Jan 23, 2018
Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Brett Best, Simone C.O. Conceição, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.