Have a personal or library account? Click to login
STEM as a Catalyst for Education 5.0 to Improve 21st Century Skills in College Students: A Literature Review Cover

STEM as a Catalyst for Education 5.0 to Improve 21st Century Skills in College Students: A Literature Review

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Abildinova, G., Assainova, A.A., Karymsakova, A., Abykenova, D., and Temirkhanova, M. (2024). Transforming high school education with digital tools: a systematic review. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 23: 668–694, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.34.
  2. Abrahão, R., Rocha, E.A.D., Pirissato, F.C., and Silva, R.A.D. (2024). Educação 5.0: promovendo inclusão e aprendizagem significativa para todos. Monumenta Revista Científica Multidisciplinar 6: 38–44, https://doi.org/10.57077/monumenta.v6i1.164.
  3. Adeleye, Olabisi Oluwakemi, Abimbola Eden, Chima, and Sulaimon Adeniyi, Idowu (2024). Educational technology and the digital divide: a conceptual framework for technical literacy inclusion. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 12: 150–156, https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.1.0405.
  4. Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Mujtaba, G., Amin, M.S., and Whangbo, T. (2023). Education 5.0: requirements, enabling technologies, and future directions. Comput. Soc. 5: 1–24.
  5. Sarihan, A.Y., Sarihan, S., and Cig, H.K. (2024). STEM education in the future. In: 13th Proceedings of London international conferences, July 24-26, 2024 Canada.
  6. Ahuja, V. (2023). Equity and access in digital education: bridging the divide. In: Arinushkina, A.A., Morozov, A.V., and Robert, I.V. (Eds.), Advances in educational technologies and instructional design. IGI Global, pp. 45–59.
  7. Andriyanto, A. and Rahdiyanta, D. (2025). Systematic literature review: the influence of project-based learning (PJBL) on critical thinking and creative thinking skills of vocational high school students. Int. J. Res. Innovation Soc. Sci. 8: 977–982, https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120082.
  8. Angelianawati, L., Hayati, H., Tamami, B., Hetharion, W.Y., and Lekahena, V. (2024). Advancing critical thinking abilities in education: crafting technology-infused learning models. Glob. Int. J. Innov. Res. 2: 400–408, https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i1.68.
  9. Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A.A., Abid, N., and Kumar, T. (2023). Challenges in implementing STEM education: insights from novice STEM teachers in developing countries. Sustainability 15: 14455, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914455.
  10. Assouline, S.G., Mahatmya, D., Ihrig, L.M., Lynch, S., and Karakis, N. (2023). The study presents a theoretically based STEM talent development program that aims to bridge excellence gaps. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1522: 109–116, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14978.
  11. Ayeni, Oyebola Olusola, Chisom, Onyebuchi Nneamaka, Hamad, Nancy Mohd Al, Osawaru, Blessing, and Adewusi, Ololade Elizabeth (2024). Enhancing STEM education through emotional intelligence and counseling techniques. World J Adv. Res. Rev. 21: 903–916, https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0503.
  12. Babalola, E.O. and Keku, E. (2024). Ethno-STEM integrated project-based learning to improve students’ creative thinking skills. Int. J. Ethnoscience Technol. Educ. 1: 116–130, https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i2.11308.
  13. Babu, B.V. (2024). Education 5.0. In: Garg, A., Babu, B.V., and Balas, V.E. (Eds.), Advances in technological innovations in higher education, 1st ed. CRC Press, USA, pp. 168–243.
  14. Castillo, L. (2024). Examination of AI and conventional teaching approaches to cultivating critical thinking skills in high school students. J. Syst. Cybern. Inf. 22: 109–112, https://doi.org/10.54808/JSCI.22.07.109.
  15. Chasokela, D. (2024). Framework for implementing STEM learning technologies: addressing students’ challenges of developing 21st-Century skills. In: Kayyali, M. and Christiansen, B. (Eds.). Advances in higher education and professional development. IGI Global, United States of America, pp. 169–208.
  16. Cintamulya, I., Murtini, I., and Warli, W. (2024). Optimization of critical thinking by empowering collaboration and communication skills through information literacy-based E-Books: in STEM-integrated problem-based learning. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 14: 151–166, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.1.151.
  17. Derevyanchuk, O., Ridei, N., Tytova, N., Ravlyuk, V., and Yatsko, O. (2025). The STEM project “modeling of spatial images of stellated polyhedra” is being implemented in the professional training of future vocational education teachers. Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol. 9: 84–100, https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i1.3623.
  18. Dubek, M., Rickey, N., and DeLuca, C. (2024). Balancing disciplinary and integrated learning: how exemplary STEM teachers negotiate tensions of practice. Sch. Sci. Math. 124: 249–265, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12645.
  19. Eden, C.M., Chisom, O.N., and Adeniyi, I.S. (2024). Harnessing technology integration in education: strategies for enhancing learning outcomes and equity. World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci. 11: 1–8, https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.2.0071.
  20. Fadillah, M.A., Hirahmah, A., Asrizal, and Usmeldi (2024). The effect of STEM-based interventions on learning outcomes in high school: a meta-analysis. J. Innovat. Phys. Educ. 2: 102–112, https://doi.org/10.24036/jipt/vol2-iss2/53.
  21. Fitri, R., Lufri, L., Alberida, H., Amran, A., and Fachry, R. (2024). This review examines the project-based learning model and its contribution to enhancing student creativity. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) 10: 223–233, https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31499.
  22. Fitriani, R. and Prodjosantoso, A. (2024). The role of technology in the development of critical thinking: systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA 10: 778–783, https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.7855.
  23. Gaur, A. and Kalita, K. (2024). Impact of enhanced learning approaches on STEM-focused education for school children in Assam, India. In: 2024 IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering (TALE). Bangalore, India, pp. 1–8.
  24. Haddaway, N.R., Page, M.J., Pritchard, C.C., and McGuinness, L.A. (2022). PRISMA2020: an R package and shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open synthesis. Campbell Syst. Rev. 18: e1230, https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230.
  25. Hai, T.D., Linh, N.Q., and Bich, N.T. (2023). Obstacles and challenges in implementing STEM education in high schools: a case study in the northern Mountains of Vietnam. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 12: 1363–1375, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1363.
  26. Hazana, E.M. (2024). Integrated STEM education into the IPA curriculum to enhance students’ creativity and language skills at SMPN 1 cigombong. Bhinneka: Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Dan Bahasa 3: 36–45, https://doi.org/10.59024/bhinneka.v3i1.1130.
  27. Hendrik, L., Jessen Eller, K., Cassidy, M., Lourentzou, I., Perry, A., and Celi, L. (2025). They have developed a machine-learning-driven digital teaching assistant that leverages student engagement data to enhance access to and success in K-12 STEM education. Learn. Lett. 4: 1–12, https://doi.org/10.59453/ll.v4.31.
  28. Herianto, Ikhsan, J., and Purwastuti, L.A. (2024). Developing student 21st-century skills through the STEM engineering design learning cycle (STEM-EDELCY) model. J. Educ. Res. 117: 137–150, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2346659.
  29. Hossain, M.A., Deehan, J., and Gibbs, L. (2024). Unveiling the pedagogical approaches in STEM classrooms: a scoping review. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 23: 1–22, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.12.1.
  30. Indriyani, N., Erita, Y., Undari, M., and Sanjaya, W. (2022). Comparison of civics and social studies learning design models in various countries at the elementary school level. J. Digit. Learn. Dist. Educ. 1: 258–269, https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i7.44.
  31. Kaggwa, R.J., Blevins, A., Wester, E., Arango-Caro, S., Woodford-Thomas, T., and Callis-Duehl, K. (2023). STEM outreach to underresourced schools: a model for inclusive student engagement. J. STEM Outreach 6: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v6i1.04.
  32. Karuru, P., Sipahelut, J., Riyanti, R., Saleh, M., and Makulua, K. (2024). The development of technology-based learning models aims to enhance critical thinking skills among education students. Glob. Int. J. Innov. Res. 2: 330–335, https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i1.53.
  33. Kavoura, T., Stathopoulou, V., and Tsichls, E. (2023). This paper evaluates a technology-enhanced educational project that involved building a collaborative STEM culture through the creation of a website, radio program, and journal with high school students from the 4th high school of ilion. European J. Eng. Technol. Res.: 96–106, https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2023.1.CIE.3142.
  34. Kazemnia, A.J., Garg, A., Wang, L.Z., Karikkineth, A.C., and Koldobskiy, D.M. (2023). Enhancing STEM education to communities with low access to STEM resources. 2023. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), New York, United States, pp. 238–239.
  35. Kehinde, B. (2023). Supporting STEM success: digital curriculum innovations to foster student retention. Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. (IJSRM) 11: 982–1000, https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i04.ec3.
  36. Knaeble, M., Sailer, G., Chen, Z., Schwarz, T., Yang, K., Nadj, M., Stiefelhagen, R., and Maedche, A. (2023). AutoChemplete–Making chemical structural formulas accessible. In: 20th international web for all conference. Texas, USA, pp. 104–115.
  37. Kohnke, S. and Zaugg, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence: an untapped opportunity for equity and access in STEM education. Educ. Sci. 15: 68, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010068.
  38. Laila, S., Wardani, R.S., Umayah, A.R., Huda, M.K., and Hutahuruk, A.F. (2024). Peran pendekatan STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) dalam pembelajaran. J. Nat. Sci. 5: 213–223, https://doi.org/10.34007/jonas.v5i3.703.
  39. Lazaro, V.J.M. and Paglinawan, J.L. (2025). Laboratory resource availability and students’ engagement in science. Int. J. Res. Innovat. Appl. Sci. 9: 146–153, https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.912015.
  40. Lee, W.-L., Hu, C.-F., and Wu, C.-C. (2024). A STEM approach to teach high school students IoT and AI concepts: an air quality example. In: Proceedings of the 2024 on innovation and technology in computer science education V., Vol. 2. Milan, Italy, pp. 806–902.
  41. Ludwig, C.M., Howsmon, R.A., Stromholt, S., Valenzuela, J.J., Calder, R., and Baliga, N.S. (2024). The study provides consequential insights for advancing informal STEM learning and outcomes for students from historically marginalized communities. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11: 351–371, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02797-w.
  42. Marfu’ah, Siti, Farwati, Ratna, and Meristin, Annisa (2024). Developing high school students’ creativity through practical work on utilizing durian peel waste in project-based learning. Orbital: J. Pendidik. Kim. 8: 143–152, https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v8i2.24734.
  43. McElroy, L.M. and Ladner, D.P. (2014). Defining the study cohort: inclusion and exclusion criteria. In: Pawlik, T.M., and Sosa, J.A. (Eds.), Success in academic surgery: clinical trials. Springer, London, pp. 131–139.
  44. Mcharo, H.B. and Wandela, E.L. (2024). The relationship between project-based assessments and students’ creativity in secondary schools. Br. J. Educ. 12: 68–81, https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013/vol12n106881.
  45. Memon, F.N. and Memon, S.N. (2024). Digital divide and equity in education: bridging gaps to ensure inclusive learning. In: Siyal, S. (Ed.). Advances in educational technologies and instructional design. IGI Global, USA, pp. 107–130.
  46. Naraidoo, S., Doargajudhur, M., Hosanoo, Z., and Zaung, N. (2024). Navigating the pedagogical innovation and digital transformation landscape in the education 5.0 era. In: Chemsi, G., Elimadi, I., Sadiq, M., and Radid, M. (Eds.), Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership. IGI Global, USA, pp. 1–24.
  47. Nawaz, M., Ahmed Khan, I., and Imran Ahmad, M. (2024). STEM integration in resource constrained environments. In: Azeem Ashraf, M. and Maekele Tsegay, S. (Eds.). Education and human development, Vol. 14. IntechOpen, UK, pp. 1–15.
  48. Ningtyas, P.K., Widarti, H.R., Parlan, P., Rahayu, S., and Dasna, I.W. (2024). Enhancing students’ abilities and skills through science learning integrated STEM: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol. 12: 1161–1181, https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4292.
  49. Nixon, N., Lin, Y., and Snow, L. (2024). Catalyzing equity in STEM teams: harnessing generative AI for inclusion and diversity. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 11: 85–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231220356.
  50. Pagutayao, V.S. and Paglinawan, Dr. J.L. (2024). Digital learning tool availability and students’ engagement in science. Int. J. Res. Innovat. Appl. Sci. IX: 13–19, Nijmegen, Netherlands https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.912002.
  51. Papilaya, P.M. and Salhuteru, C.P. (2024). Project-based STEAM learning based on sound of green: empowering students’ creative thinking. KnE Soc. Sci.: 506–528, Ambon, Indonesia https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i31.17612.
  52. Paulo, E.D.M., Ernandes, I., Nunes, J.R., Kochen, V.L., Brugnera, E.D., and Vieira, J.L.D.S. (2024). Desenvolvendo habilidades do século Xxi com TDIC. Aracê 6: 5340–5354, https://doi.org/10.56238/arev6n3-064.
  53. Rarastika, Nur, Nasution, Khairunnisa, Chaira Nainggolan, Monalisa, Tarisya, Dwi, Safira, Rehan, Isyrofirrahmah, Isyrofirrahmah, and Mailani, Elvi (2024). Efektivitas pendekatan berbasis STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) dalam pembelajaran matematika abad ke-21. Jurnal Sadewa: Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Sosial 3: 105–113, https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v3i1.1464.
  54. Safitri, E. (2023). A comprehensive review of the guided inquiry learning model in education. J. Digit. Learn. Dist. Educ. 2: 622–626, https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i7.268.
  55. Salame, A.H., Tengku Shahdan, T.S., Kayode, B.K., and Pek, L.S. (2024). Enhancing STEM education in rural schools through play activities: a scoping review. Int. J. Stud. Educ. 7: 103–124, https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.293.
  56. Saldívar-Almorejo, M.M., Flores-Herrera, L.A., Rivera-Blas, R., Niño-Suárez, P.A., Rivera-Blas, E.Z., and Rodríguez-Contreras, N. (2024). E-Learning challenges in STEM education. Educ. Sci. 14: 1370, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121370.
  57. Salvetti, F., Rijal, K., Owusu-Darko, I., and Prayogi, S. (2023). Surmounting obstacles in STEM education: an In-depth analysis of literature paving the way for proficient pedagogy in STEM learning. Intr. J. Essent. Competencies Education 2: 177–196, https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v2i2.1614.
  58. Sangwaranatee, N., Sangwaranatee, N., and Saisin, K. (2024). Teaching STEAM and engineering education through project-based learning: fostering creativity and innovation in students. In: 2024 9th international STEM education conference (iSTEM-Ed). Phetchaburi, Thailand, pp. 1–7.
  59. Setiyawan, A.A., Agoestanto, A., and Isnarto, I. (2024). The study focuses on enhancing self-regulated learning and critical thinking in STEM through flipped classroom models. J. Elemen. 10: 341–362, https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i2.25322.
  60. Sharma, L.R. (2024). Overcoming challenges: strategies for success in 21st-Century STEM education. Nepal J. Multidiscip. Res. 7: 61–75, https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v7i4.73786.
  61. Siregar, N.C., Warsito, W., Gumilar, A., Amarullah, A., and Rosli, R. (2024). STEM in action: real-world applications of science, technology, engineering, and math. Prima J. Pendidik. Mat. 8: 493–502, https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v8i2.11323.
  62. Tiken, N., Erita, Y., Putri, R.S, and Salmiyanti. (2023). Application of electronic learning and educators’ challenges in the 21st century. J. Digit. Learn. Dist. Educ. 1: 355–360, https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i11.63.
  63. Todorov, T., Bogdanova, G., Dochkova-Todorova, J., and Sabev, N. (2024). Accessibility of E-Learning and STEM education. TEM J. 13: 3505–3513, https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM134-83.
  64. University, Sofia and Dimitrova, N. (2024). Integrating a STEM educational approach in the secondary school–challenges, opportunities, and perspectives. Pedagogika-Pedagogy 96: 1232–1243, https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2024-9.04.
  65. Valerio, C., Gaggini, G., Fascendini, G., and Covarrubias-Rodriguez, M. (2024). Innovative integration: enhancing STEM education with the infento kit. In: 3D printing, and augmented reality. CAD’24, Texas, USA, pp. 117–125.
  66. Vieira, R., Monteiro, P., Azevedo, G., and Oliveira, J. (2023). Society 5.0 and education 5.0: a critical reflection. In: 2023 18th iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI). Aveiro, Portugal, pp. 1–6.
  67. Widiastuti, I., Budiyanto, C.W., Andry, F.E.C.S., and Akhyar, M. (2023). Work-in-Progress of exploring high school students’ science concepts during an engineering design challenge. In: 2023 IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering (TALE). Bengaluru, India, pp. 1–4.
  68. Wulandari, N.O., Sutrio, Doyan, A., & Rahayau, S. (2024). The influence of the project-based learning model on creative thinking skills and physics learning outcomes. J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, 10, 10660–10669. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9738.
  69. Yang, S. and Oh, E. (2024). Transcending disciplinary boundaries: the advantages, challenges, and future directions of STEM education. Academic J. Sci. Technol. 13: 72–77, https://doi.org/10.54097/f2vdfx14.
  70. Yıldız, M. and Ecevit, T. (2024). Impact of STEM on primary school students’ 21st century skills, NOS, and learning experiences. Asya Öğretim Dergisi 12: 21–37, https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1395298.
  71. Yu, H. (2024). Enhancing creative cognition through project-based learning: an in-depth scholarly exploration. Heliyon 10: e27706, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27706.
Language: English
Submitted on: May 8, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 24, 2025
Published on: Dec 3, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Ruth Megawati, Wachju Subchan, Dwi Wahyuni, Tanta Tanta, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.