References
- [1] Thornton RK. Using the results of research in science education to improve science learning. In: Proc Int Conf Sci Educ. Nicosia, Cyprus; 1999. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5e80/e17d7cc3fc1f570fe53cd4eb41b721875ed7.pdf.
- [2] Deng F, Chen W, Chai ChS, Qian Y. Constructivist-oriented data-logging activities in Chinese chemistry classroom. Asia-Pac Educ Res. 2011;20(2):207-221. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=4113.
- [3] Tinker RF. Microcomputer-Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 1996. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783642647406.
- [4] Demkanin P, Bartosovic L, Velanova M. Simple multiplication as a form of presenting experience with introducing data loggers to physics teachers who do not have any experience with usage of such tools in education. In: Chova LG, Torres IC, Martinez AL, editors. EDULEARN12 Proc 4th Int Conf Educ New Learning Technol. Barcelona: IATED; 2012. http://www.ddp.fmph.uniba.sk/~bartosovic/papers/Edulearn_2012.pdf.
- [5] Tortosa M. The use of microcomputer based laboratories in chemistry secondary education. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2012;13(3):161-171. DOI: 10.1039/C2RP00019A.10.1039/C2RP00019
- [6] Kennedy D, Finn S. The use of datalogging in teaching physics and chemistry in second-level schools in Ireland. Cork: The National Centre for Technology in Education, University College; 2000. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.117.2619&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
- [7] Brasell H. The effect of real-time graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. J Res Sci Teach. 1987;24(2):385-395. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660240409.10.1002/tea.3660240409
- [8] Beichner RJ. The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27(8):803-815. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660270809.
- [9] Seah WCh, Tan DKC, Hedberg JG, Koh TS. Use of dataloggers in science learning in Singapore schools. In: Looi Ch, Jonassen D, Ikeda M, editors. Proc 13th Int Conf Computers in Education. Singapore: ICCE; 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221319416_Use_of_Dataloggers_in_Science_Learning_in_Singapore_Schools.
- [10] Zucker AA, Tinker R, Staudt C, Mansfield A, Metcalf S. Learning science in grades 3-8 using probeware and computers. J Sci Educ Technol. 2008;17(1):42-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-007-9086-y.
- [11] Smejkal P, Stratilova Urvalkova E. Support for use of probeware in science for teachers and pupils. In: Ciesla P, Nodzynska M, Stawoska I, editors. Chemistry Education in the Light of the Research. Kraków: Pedagogical University of Krakow; 2012. http://comblab.eu/sites/default/files/publications/smejkal.pdf.
- [12] Tan DKCh, Hedberg JG, Koh TS, Seah WCh. Datalogging: a unique affordance unrealized? In: ASERA 2005. Hamilton: Australasian Science Education Research Association; 2005. https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/2737/1/datalogging_ASERA.pdf.
- [13] Sorgo A, Kocijancic S. False reality or hidden messages: Reading graphs obtained in computerized biological experiments. Eurasia J Math Sci T. 2012;8(2):129-135. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2012.826a.10.12973/eurasia.2012.826a
- [14] Bingimlas KA. Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments. Eurasia J Math Sci T. 2009;5(3):235-245. DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/75275.10.12973/ejmste/75275
- [15] Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2007. DOI: 10.4135/9781452230153.10.4135/9781452230153
- [16] Banchi H, Bell R. The many levels of inquiry. Sci Children. 2008;46(2):26-29. https://engage.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/30979-102-1-37824/4%20Levels%20of%20Science%20Inquiry.pdf.