Application of central composite design to optimize the amount of carbon source and prebiotics for Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01

Shu, Guowei; Lei, Ni; Chen, He; Hu, Man; Yang, Hui

doi:10.1515/aucft-2016-0003

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to obtain the optimum proportion of the carbon source and prebiotics for Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01 by the central composite design (CCD). The effect of carbon source (lactose) and two prebiotics (inulin and fructooligosaccharides) on the BB01 were observed by measuring the OD₆₀₀ value, pH value and the viable counts at 18h. The final optimized concentrations of carbon source and prebiotics were: lactose 1.6%, inulin 0.26%, and fructooligosaccharides 0.22%. The result indicates that the growth of B. bifidum BB01 shows an significant increase in the optimized culture medium (p < 0.05), the OD₆₀₀ value reached 1.434 at 18h, which increased 6.58% compared to the control. And the viable counts of B. bifidum BB01 increased 24.36% and reached (2.17±0.06) ×10⁹cfu/mL. The results show that the optimization of the carbon source and prebiotics using CCD in this study is workable and necessary.

References

1. Baroutkoub A., Mehdi, R. Z., Beglarian R., et al. (2010). Effects of probiotic yogurt consumption on the serum cholesterol levels in hypercholestromic cases in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Sci. Res. Essays. 5 (16), 2206–2209.
Search in Google Scholar
2. Box, G. E. P. & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. (Ser. B) 13, 1–45.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x
Search in Google Scholar
3. De Vrese M., Steglman A., Richter B., et al. (2001). Probiotics-compensation for lactase insufficiency. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 421–429.10.1093/ajcn/73.2.421s
Search in Google Scholar
4. Falony G., Calmeyn T., Lero F, et al. (2009). Coculture fermentations of bifidobacterium species and bacteroides thetaiotaomicron reveal a mechanistic insight into the prebiotic effect of inulin-type fructans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(8), 2312-2319.10.1128/AEM.02649-08
Search in Google Scholar
5. Goderska K. & Czarnecki Z. (2007). Characterization of selected strains from Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 1 (6), 065–078.
Search in Google Scholar
6. Guo X.F.. (2006). The study on the prebiotic effect of neoagaro-oligosaccharides. Master’s dissertation, Ocean University of China, Shandong, China.
Search in Google Scholar
7. He T., Han R., Alvarez-Llamas G., et al. (2007). Differential analysis of protein expression of Bifidobacterium grown on different carbohydrates. J. Microbiol. Methods. 69(2), 364-370.10.1016/j.mimet.2007.02.008
Search in Google Scholar
8. Hendrix, C. (1980). Through the response surface with test tube and pipe wrench. Chemtechol. 10, 488-497.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Holzapfel, W. H., Haberer P., Snel J., et al. (1998). Overview of gut flora and probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41(2), 85–101.10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00044-0
Search in Google Scholar
10. Hirokazu O. & Kenji Sonomoto. (1995). Arabinogalactan Utilization in Continuous Cultures of Bifidobacterium longum: Effect of Co-culture with Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Anaerobe. 1(2), 103-112.10.1006/anae.1995.1005
Search in Google Scholar
11. Kabeerdoss J., Devi, R. S., Mary, R. R., et al. (2011). Effect of yoghurt containing Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 on faecal excretion of secretory immunoglobulin A and human beta-defensin 2 in healthy adult volunteers. Nutr. J. 10(1), 1-4.10.1186/1475-2891-10-138
Search in Google Scholar
12. Kalil, S. J., Maugeri F, & Rodrigues, M. I. (2000). Response surface analysis and simulation as a tool for bioprocess design and optimization. Proc. Biochem. 35(6), 539-550.10.1016/S0032-9592(99)00101-6
Search in Google Scholar
13. Mainville I., Arcand Y. & Farnworth, E. R. (2005). A dynamic model that simulates the human upper gastrointestinal tract for the study of probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 99 (3), 287–296.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.08.02015808363
Search in Google Scholar
14. Ozer D., Akin S. & Ozer B. (2005). Effect of inulin and lactulose on survival of lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and bifidobacterium bifidum BB-02 in acidophilus-bifidus Yoghurt. Food Science and Technology International. 11(1), 19-24.10.1177/1082013205051275
Search in Google Scholar
15. Rafter, J. (2004). Probiotics and colon cancer. Nutrition research reviews. 17(2), 277–284.10.1079/NRR200484
Search in Google Scholar
16. Schiffrin, E. J. & Blum S. (2001). Food processing: probiotic microorganisms for beneficial foods. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12(5), 499–502.10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00253-6
Search in Google Scholar
17. Torrades F., Saiz S., Garcia-Hortal J.A. (2011). Using central composite experimental design to optimize the degradation of black liquor by Fenton reagent. Desalination. 268(1-3):97-102.
Search in Google Scholar
18. Veronique C., M. Feinberg, C. Constantin. & D. Christian (1983). Application of response surface methodology to evaluation of bioconversion experimental conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45(2), 634-639.10.1128/aem.45.2.634-639.198324233616346211
Search in Google Scholar
19. Wang S., Zhu H., Lu C., et al. (2012). Fermented milk supplemented with probiotics and prebiotics can effectively alter the intestinal microbiota and immunity of host animals. J. Dairy Sci. 95(9), 4813–4822.10.3168/jds.2012-542622916885
Search in Google Scholar
20. Wasli A.S., Salleh M.M., Aziz S.A., et al. (2009). Medium optimization for chitinase production from Trichoderma virens using central composite design. Biotechnology & Bioprocess Engineering. 14(6):781-787.
Search in Google Scholar
21. Zheng Z.M., Hu Q.L., Hao J., et al. (2008). Statistical optimization of culture conditions for 1,3-propanediol by Klebsiella pneumoniae AC 15 via central composite design. Bioresource Technology. 99(5):1052-1056.
Search in Google Scholar

Application of central composite design to optimize the amount of carbon source and prebiotics for Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01

Abstract

Paradigm

My account