A 2-Tuple Linguistic Dynamic OWAWA Aggregation Operator and its application to multi-Attribute decision-making

Zulueta-Véliz, Yeleny; Rodríguez, Carlos Rafael Rodríguez; Velazco, Aylin Estrada

doi:10.14313/jamris-2025-032

References

L. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Logic = Computing with Words”, Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, 1996, pp. 103–111, doi:10.1109/91.493904.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
L. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Logic—A Personal Perspective”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 281, 2015, pp. 4–20, doi:10.1016/j.fss.2015.05.009.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
L. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, 1965, pp. 338–353, doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Z. Pawlak, “Rough Sets”, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, vol. 11, 1982, doi:10.1007/BF01001956.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
L. Zadeh, “Toward a Theory of Fuzzy Information Granulation and its Centrality in Human Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 90, no. 2, 1997, pp. 111–127, doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00077-8.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
H. Kamaci, S. Petchimuthu, and E. Akçetin, “Dynamic Aggregation Operators and Einstein Operations Based on Interval-Valued Picture Hesitant Fuzzy Information and their Applications in Multi-Period Decision Making”, Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 40, 2021, doi:10.1007/s40314-021-01510-w.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
J. Morente-Molinera et al., “A Novel MultiCriteria Group Decision-Making Method for Heterogeneous and Dynamic Contexts Using Multi-Granular Fuzzy Linguistic Modelling and Consensus Measures”, Information Fusion, vol. 53, 2020, pp. 240–250, doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.028.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
R. Tao, et al., “A Dynamic Group MCDM Model with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set: Perspective of Alternative Queuing Method”, Information Sciences, vol. 555, 2021, pp. 85–103, doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.033.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
F. Teng, C. Du, M. Shen, and P. Liu, “A Dynamic Large-Scale Multiple Attribute Group DecisionMaking Method with Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets Based on Trust Relationship and Opinion Correlation”, Information Sciences, vol. 612, 2022, pp. 257–295, doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.092.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Y. Zulueta-Veliz and L. García-Cabrera, “A Choquet Integral-Based Approach to Multiattribute Decision-Making with Correlated Periods”, Granular Computing, vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, pp. 245–256, doi:10.1007/s41066-018-0095-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
F. Herrera and L. Martinez, “A 2-tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model for Computing with Words”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, 2000, pp. 746–752.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
T. Malhotra and A. Gupta, “A Systematic Review of Developments in the 2-tuple Linguistic Model and its Applications in Decision Analysis”, Soft Computing, vol. 27, 2020, doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05031-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Y. Zulueta-Veliz and P. J. Sanchez, “Linguistic Dynamic Multicriteria Decision Making Using Symbolic Linguistic Computing Models”, Granular Computing, vol. 3, no. 3, 2018, pp. 229–244, doi:10.1007/s41066-018-0088-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Z. Xu, “Multi-Period Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Under Linguistic Assessments”, International Journal of General Systems, vol. 38, no. 8, 2009, pp. 823–850, doi:10.1080/03081070903257920.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Y. Liu, “A Method for 2-tuple Linguistic Dynamic Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Entropy Weight”, Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 4, 2014, pp. 1803–1810, doi:10.3233/IFS-141147.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
R. Yager, “On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multicriteria Decision Making”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. I, no. 18, 1988, pp. 183–190, doi:10.1109/21.87068.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
D. García-Zamora et al., “Admissible OWA Operators for Fuzzy Numbers”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 480, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.fss.2024.108863.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
V. Torra, “The Weighted OWA Operator”, InternationalJournal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 12, 1997, pp. 153–166.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Z. Xu and Q. Da, “An Overview of Operators for Aggregating Information”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 18, 2003, pp. 953–969.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
J. Merigo, “On the Use of the OWA Operator in the Weighted Average and its Application in Decision Making”, Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 41, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
L. Martinez, R. M. Rodriguez, and F. Herrera, The 2tuple Linguistic Model: Computing with Words in Decision Making, Springer International Publishing, 2015, p. 162, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24714-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
G. Jimenez and Y. Zulueta, “A 2-tuple Linguistic Multi-Period Decision Making Approach for Dynamic Green Supplier Selection”, Revista DYNA, vol. 84, no. 202, 2017, pp. 199–206, doi:10.15446/dyna.v84n202.58032.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
F. Ai and J. Yang, “Approaches to Dynamic Multiple Attribute Decision Making with 2-tuple Linguistic Information”, Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 6, 2014, pp. 2715–2723, doi:10.3233/IFS-131094.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

A 2-Tuple Linguistic Dynamic OWAWA Aggregation Operator and its application to multi-Attribute decision-making

References

Paradigm

My account