Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Health Recommender System for Sleep Apnea Using Computational Intelligence Cover

Health Recommender System for Sleep Apnea Using Computational Intelligence

Open Access
|Sep 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Workflow of sleep apnea diagnosis process
Workflow of sleep apnea diagnosis process

Figure 2.

SA symptoms, causes, and consequences
SA symptoms, causes, and consequences

Figure 3.

Breathing patterns
Breathing patterns

Figure 4.

Workflow for an HRS for SA
Workflow for an HRS for SA

Database search and selection criteria

Electronic database
  • PubMed

  • Google Scholar

  • IEEE Xplore

  • NCBI

Inclusion criteria
  • Articles on developing or validating a sleep apnea prediction model using various data sources, such as individual patient data or electronic health records.

  • Wearable device data, physiological processing, or physical movement measurements data can be used to classify sleep disorders by ML.

  • All the signals measured in any format, such as continuous, binary, ordinal, multinomial, and time-to-event.

Exclusion criteria
  • Research employing ML to classify non-physiological data, such as questionnaire ratings.

  • Studies that only study physiological relationships with sleep apnea as a method of information discovery.

  • Reviews, concept papers, and abstracts-only articles.

Search strategy

PopulationStudies using physiological data to build sleep apnea classi^ication algorithms
ComparisonDifferent models and their utility for clinical intervention
OutcomeAbility to detect or predict sleep apnea, sleep arousals, respiratory events during sleep
Study typeQuantitative study
KeywordsSleep apnea, recommender system, polysomnography, machine learning, artificial intelligence

Treatment options for SA

AuthorTreatmentObservationsImprovements
Boisteano, et al. 2009 [33]fixed CPAP, ACPAPACPAP effectively lowers pressure. It is a long-term treatment option.Intelligent CPAP with remote monitoring can reduce frequent doctor visits, reducing overall cost.
Penzel et al. 2011 [34]CPAPOSA affects cardiovascular, respiratory regulation during sleepCPAP affects cardiovascular coupling during deep sleep; baroreflex sensitivity response varies across sleep stages.
Jané, 2014 [30]CPAP, adaptive pressure algorithm, M-Health, Tele-HealthOSA disrupts airflow during sleep; SpO2is also reduced.Standard treatment option is CPAP, advanced CPAP with adaptive pressure settings.
Aurora et al. 2016 [36]ASV for CSA patientsCardiac mortality rate is high for LVEF >= 45%, moderate-severe CSA.ASV suggested for patients with LVEF >45% and mild-moderate CSA.
Senavongse et al. 2017 [31]A low-cost functional prototype is designed.Modern CPAP machine is not affordable to everyone nowadays.The functional prototype demonstrates accurate measurements and improves OSA, snoring treatment.
Webster et al. 2018 [37]Novel SA treatment device consisting of mask, hose pipe, CO2 chamber.Device automatically adjusts rebreathed air to reduce apneas.No need for CPAP
Amrulloh et al. 2019 [32]OCPAP controller developed using LabView softwareOCPAP adapts air pressure based on respiratory needsLow-cost treatment option that reduces dependency on CPAP.
Daga et al. 2021 [35]MAD and yoga exerciseSleep quality is assessed before and after MAD surgery.MAD group showed immediate improvements while the yoga group showed sustained improvements over a long time period.

DL algorithms for SA diagnosis

AuthorBio signalDL AlgorithmPerformanceType of Classification
Accuracy (%)SensitivitySpecificity
Huttunen, 2023 [25]SpO2, PR, ECGCNN, RGdetection
Sharma et al., 2022 [49]SpO2, PRCNN93.4%detection
Strumpf et al., 2023 [56]SpO2, HRANN91%0.830.76multiclass classification
Hemrajani et al., 2023 [57]ECGRNN, LSTM, GRU.89.5% RNN; 90% LSTM; 90.5% GRUclassification
Korkalainen et al., 2021 [26]EEG, SpO2CNN, RNNhazard ratio = 1.14 (p = 0.39) for mild OSAhazard ratio = 1.59 (p < 0.01) for moderate OSAhazard ratio = 4.13 (p < 0.01) for severe OSAestimation
Liu et al., 2020 [45]EEG, SpO2CNN, RFAUROC = 0.95AUPRC = 0.552detection
Mitri et al., 2017 [46]Nasal pressure, CPAP pressure readingsHTM, NABanomaly detection
Sun et al., 2019 [55]EEGRNNbinary classification
Yung et al., 2020 [58]ECG1D-CNN89%detection
Zarei et al., 2021 [29]ECGCNN-LSTM97.21%94.41 %98.94%detection

Various Data sets available for SA

Data SetSample SizeTypes of SignalsTime RangeMaleFemale
UCDDB data set/St. Vincent University Hospital, Dublin [73]253-channel ECG6 months214
Wisconsin Sleep Cohort [74,75]1545PSG, multiple sleep latency test1989–19931000545
STAGES -Stanford Technology Analytics and Genomics in Sleep [75]1500PSG
Apnea-ECG database [76]70ECG7–10 h
MIT-BIH [73]18PSG80 h
Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) [75,77]6441PSG1995–1998

Physiotherapy treatment for SA

AuthorSample SizeTreatmentImprovements
Kumar, 2019 [38]23Yoga program for 3 months for mild-to-moderate SA and snoring issuesPositive impact on breathing pattern, oropharyngeal musculature, respiratory concerns.
Bankar, 2013 [39]2 groupsTwo groups of SA patients formed; control group and yoga groupYoga group scored higher quality of life PSQI value, reduced sleep disturbances, shorter sleep latency.
Khalsa, 2021 [40]2 groupsTwo groups of insomnia patients formed: Kundalini yoga and sleep hygieneKundalini yoga group showed improved sleep quality
Kanchibhotla, 2021 [41]473Sudarshan Kriya yoga and breathing exercisePositive impact on sleep quality. Improvement varied among patients based on age, gender, yoga practice frequency.
Kwiatkowska, 2008 [42]Fuzzy logic-based treatment method to classify physical activities performed by OSA patients based on IPAQImproves monitoring of effectiveness of CPAP treatment, physical activities performed.
Khobarkar, 2022 [43]Abhyanga Utsadana, Basti, oral medication with bitter herbsImprovement shown in blood sugar level, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, categories of BSQI.

Recommender System for SA

AuthorDisease PredictionRecommender SystemML/DL AlgorithmData Set Used
Nanehkaran, 2022 [63]Chronic Diseasecollaborative filteringK-NN classifierPhysioNet data repository
Raza et al. 2023 [65]SAtwo-stage recommender system; precision = 89%, macro-average F1 score = 84%MIMIC data set
Kaneriya et al. [68]SAMarkov decision-based recommender systemHidden Markov Model
Pinon et al., 2023 [66]federated learning recommender systemhistorical disease-drug interactions and drug data
del Rio et al., 2023 [67]Chronic Diseaserestricted Boltzmann machinewearable sensors connected on patient’s body
Casal-Guisande et al., 2023 [64]OSApersonalized recommendationML classifier with fuzzy expert systemdata set with 4400 patients from the Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital (Vigo, Galicia, Spain)
Torres-Ruiz et al., 2023 [69]COVID-19collaborative filtering
Chinyere et al., 2023 [70]Hospital Recommendationcollaborative filteringdata collected through mobile/web application

ML algorithms for SA diagnosis

AuthorBio signalML AlgorithmPerformanceType of Classification
Accuracy (%)SensitivitySpecificity
Sharma et al., 2023 [49]EEGK-NN, ensemble bagged trees (EbagT)92.85detection
Mencar et al., 2020 [50]Questionnaire based dataSVM, RF, LR44.7prediction
Álvarez et al., 2020 [44]SpO2, BP, HRLR, SVM81.3 Kappa coefficient = 0.71AHI prediction
Shi et al., 2022 [28]BP, SpO2GBM, XGBOOST88.50.7130.873prediction, hypertension
Kristiensen et al., 2018 [51]ECGRF, KNN, SVM, ANN87.47classification
Pombo et al., 2020 [18]ECGSVM, LR82.120.88140.7229classification
Schrader et al., 2000 [52]ECG, HRVLDA88.31classification
Lin et al., 2006 [53]ECGDWT, ANN0.69640.4444classification
Xie & Minn, 2012 [54]SpO2, ECGKNN84.80prediction and classification

Subject demographics

AuthorData Sample Size (N)Male (M)Female (F)Age Range/Mean AgeTime FrameType of Data
Peppard et al. [3]152037–852000–2015PSG
Han et al. [27]401428411173532014–2021PSG, ESS questionnaire
Shi et al. [28]149312692242019–2021PSG
Targa et al. [15]116526472–802015–2019PSG
Zarei et al. [29]25210428–682011PSG
Huttunen et al. [25]87748039644–652015–2017PSG
Pombo et al. [18]70571327–63 ECG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14313/jamris-2025-029 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2145 | Journal ISSN: 1897-8649
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 103
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 26, 2024
Published on: Sep 10, 2025
Published by: Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Mubashir Khan, Yashpal Singh, Harshit Bhardwaj, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.