Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review Cover

Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review

Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Monroe A Quinn E Samuelson W Dunleavy DM Dowd KW An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: What has changed since the 1980s? Acad Med 2013 88 672 681 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828bf252
  2. AAMC. Table B‑1: Total enrollment by U.S. medical school and sex, 2016–2017 through 2020–2021. 2019 FACTS: Applicants and matriculants data web site. 2020. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2019-11/2019_FACTS_Table_A-1.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2020.
  3. Kreiter CD Yin P Solow C Brennan RL Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004 9 147 159 10.1023/B:AHSE.0000027464.22411.0f
  4. Salvatori P Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2001 6 159 175 10.1023/A:1011489618208
  5. Eva KW Reiter HI Where judgement fails: Pitfalls in the selection process for medical personnel Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004 9 161 174 10.1023/B:AHSE.0000027479.14637.6c
  6. Burkhardt JC Stansfield RB Vohra T Losman E Turner-Lawrence D Hopson LR Prognostic value of the multiple mini-interview for emergency medicine residency performance J Emerg Med 2015 49 196 202 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.008
  7. DeVaul RA Jervey F Chappell JA Caver P Short B O’Keefe S Medical school performance of initially rejected students JAMA 1987 257 47 51 10.1001/jama.1987.03390010051027
  8. Kelly ME Dowell J Husbands A The fairness, predictive validity and acceptability of multiple mini interview in an internationally diverse student population – a mixed methods study BMC Med Educ 2014 14 267 10.1186/s12909-014-0267-0
  9. Shaw DL Martz DM Lancaster CJ Sade RM Influence of medical school applicants’ demographic and cognitive characteristics on interviewers’ ratings of noncognitive traits Acad Med 1995 70 532 536 10.1097/00001888-199506000-00015
  10. Pau A Jeevaratnam K Chen YS Fall AA Khoo C Nadarajah VD The multiple mini-interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training—A systematic review Med Teach 2013 35 1027 1041 10.3109/0142159X.2013.829912
  11. Rees EL Hawarden AW Dent G Hays R Bates J Hassell AB Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37 Med Teach 2016 38 443 455 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1158799
  12. Kneale D Thomas J Harris K Developing and optimising the use of logic models in systematic reviews: Exploring practice and good practice in the use of programme theory in reviews PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0142187 10.1371/journal.pone.0142187
  13. Baxter SK Blank L Woods HB Payne N Rimmer M Goyder E Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: Describing complex pathways in referral management interventions BMC Med Res Methodol 2014 14 62 10.1186/1471-2288-14-62
  14. Patterson F Knight A Dowell J Nicholson S Cousans F Cleland J How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review Med Educ 2016 50 36 60 10.1111/medu.12817
  15. Knorr M Hissbach J Multiple mini-interviews: Same concept, different approaches Med Educ 2014 48 1157 1175 10.1111/medu.12535
  16. Albanese MA Snow MH Skochelak SE Huggett KN Farrell PM Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions Acad Med 2003 78 313 321 10.1097/00001888-200303000-00016
  17. Callwood A Jeevaratnam K Kotronoulas G Schneider A Lewis L Nadarajah VD Personal domains assessed in multiple mini interviews (MMIs) for healthcare student selection: A narrative synthesis systematic review Nurse Educ Today 2018 64 56 64 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.016
  18. Cook DA Beckman TJ Reflections on experimental research in medical education Adv Health Sci Educ 2010 15 455 464 10.1007/s10459-008-9117-3
  19. Maclure M Mittleman MA Should we use a case-crossover design? Annu Rev Public Health 2000 21 193 221 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.193
  20. Redelmeier DA Tibshirani RJ Interpretation and bias in case-crossover studies J Clin Epidemiol 1997 50 1281 1287 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00196-0
  21. Cook DA Reed DA Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale-Education Acad Med 2015 90 1067 1076 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000786
  22. Detweiler BN Kollmorgen LE Umberham BA Hedin RJ Vassar BM Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: A meta-epidemiological study Anaesthesia 2016 71 955 968 10.1111/anae.13520
  23. Albanese MA Snow M Skochelak S Huggett K Farrell PM Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: A prospective, controlled comparison WMJ 2003 102 30 33
  24. Reiter HI Salvatori P Rosenfeld J Trinh K Eva KW The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews Med Educ 2006 40 36 42 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02348.x
  25. Uijtdehaage S Doyle L Parker N Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders Acad Med 2011 86 1032 1039 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182223ab7
  26. Eddins-Folensbee F Harris T Miller-Wasik M Thompson B Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions Acad Med 2012 87 458 462 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318249687d
  27. Husbands A Dowell J Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini-interview Med Educ 2013 47 717 725 10.1111/medu.12193
  28. Tiller D O’Mara D Rothnie I Dunn S Lee L Roberts C Internet-based multiple mini-interviews for candidate selection for graduate entry programmes Med Educ 2013 47 801 810 10.1111/medu.12224
  29. Hissbach J Sehner S Harendza S Hampe W Cutting costs of multiple mini-interviews—Changes in reliability and efficiency of the Hamburg medical school admission test between two applications BMC Med Educ 2014 14 54 10.1186/1472-6920-14-54
  30. Gay S Santen S Mangrulkar R Sission T Ross P Zaidi N The influence of MCAT and GPA preadmission academic metrics on interview scores Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018 23 151 158 10.1007/s10459-017-9779-9
  31. Kim K-J Kwon BS Does the sequence of rotations in Multiple Mini Interview stations influence the candidates’ performance? Med Educ 2018 23 1485433
  32. Yusoff MSB Comparison between personality, emotional, and educational outcomes of multiple mini interviews and personal interview Oman Med J 2020 35 e199 10.5001/omj.2020.90
  33. Yusoff MSB A comparative study on the psychological health status of pre-clinical medical students enrolled through different admission tests J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2020 15 439 446
  34. Simon SD Statistical evidence in medical trials: What do the data really tell us? 2006 Oxford Oxford University Press
  35. Chung H-O Oczkowski SJW Hanvey L Mbuagbaw L You JJ Educational interventions to train healthcare professionals in end-of-life communication: A systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Med Educ 2016 16 131 10.1186/s12909-016-0653-x
  36. Taksøe-Vester C Dyre L Schroll J Tabor A Tolsgaard M Simulation-based ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ultraschall Med 2021 42 e42 e54 10.1055/a-1300-1680
  37. O’Brien A Harvey J Shannon M Lewis K Valencia O A comparison of multiple mini-interviews and structured interviews in a UK setting Med Teach 2011 33 397 402 10.3109/0142159X.2010.541532
  38. Balshem H Helfand M Schünemann HJ GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 401 406 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
  39. Guyatt G Oxman AD Akl EA GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings table J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 383 394 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
  40. Moncher FJ Prinz RJ Treatment fidelity in outcome studies Clin Psychol Rev 1991 11 247 266 10.1016/0272-7358(91)90103-2
  41. Hadinger MA Underrepresented minorities in medical school admissions: A qualitative study Teach Learn Med 2017 29 31 41 10.1080/10401334.2016.1220861
  42. Jones RE Abdelfattah KR Virtual interviews in the era of Covid-19: A primer for applicants J Surg Educ 2020 77 733 734 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.020
  43. Novick MR The axioms and principal results of classical test theory J Math Psychol 1966 3 1 18 10.1016/0022-2496(66)90002-2
  44. Allen MJ Yen WM Introduction to measurement theory 2001 Long Grove Waveland
  45. Eva KW Macala C Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: Tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine Med Educ 2014 48 604 613 10.1111/medu.12402
  46. Roberts C Walton M Rothnie I Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school Med Educ 2008 42 396 404 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03018.x
  47. Jerant A Griffin E Rainwater J Does applicant personality influence multiple mini-interview performance and medical school acceptance offers? Acad Med 2012 87 1250 1259 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826102ad
  48. Straus SG Miles JA Levesque LL The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews J Manage 2001 27 363 381
  49. Chapman DS Rowe PM The influence of videoconference technology and interview structure on the recruiting function of the employment interview: A field experiment Int J Sel Assess 2002 10 185 197 10.1111/1468-2389.00208
  50. Seijts G Kyei-Poku I The role of situational interviews in fostering positive reactions to selection decisions Appl Psychol 2010 59 431 453 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00406.x
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 29, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2022
|
Published on: Sep 22, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 John C. Lin, Anagha Lokhande, Curtis E. Margo, Paul B. Greenberg, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.