Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review Cover

Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review

Open Access
|Sep 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Table 1

Determination of risk of bias and study quality

Study

Risk of biasa

Study designb

Samplingb

Type of datab

Validity of evaluation instrumentb

Data analysisb

Outcomesb

Total MERSQI scoreb

Shaw et al. (1995) [9]

0

2

2

3

3

3

3

16

Albanese et al. (2003) [16]

0

2

1.5

1

2

3

3

12.5

Reiter et al. (2006): Study 1 [24]

2

3

2

3

2

2

3

15

Reiter et al. (2006): Study 2 [24]

2

3

2

3

2

2

3

15

Uijtdehaage et al. (2011) [25]

0

3

2

3

3

3

3

17

Eddins-Folensbee et al. (2012) [26]

2

2

2

3

2

3

3

15

Husbands et al. (2013) [27]

0

2

2

3

3

3

3

16

Tiller et al. (2013) [28]

0

2

2

3

2

3

3

15

Hissbach et al. (2014) [29]

0

2

2

3

3

3

3

16

Gay et al. (2018) [30]

0

3

2

3

2

3

3

16

Kim et al. (2018) [31]

1

2

2

1

2

3

3

13

Yusoff et al. (2020) [32]

0

2

2

1

2

3

3

13

Yusoff et al. (2020) [33]

0

2

2

1

2

3

3

13

MERSQI Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument

a Based on the Oxford risk of bias tool

b Based on MERSQI

Fig. 2

A logic model for how to conduct a medical school admissions interview

Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 29, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2022
|
Published on: Sep 22, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 John C. Lin, Anagha Lokhande, Curtis E. Margo, Paul B. Greenberg, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.