Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools Cover

The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Abstract

Introduction Systematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical school, drawing together the key messages from research to date to provide guidance for educators to operationalize and enact change and identify areas for further research.

Methods Authors first identified areas of conceptual importance within differential attainment (learning, assessment, and systems/institutional factors) which were then the focus of a targeted review of the literature on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical education and, where available and relevant, literature from higher education more generally. Each author then conducted a review of the literature and proposed guidelines based on their experience and research literature. The guidelines were iteratively reviewed and refined between all authors until we reached consensus on the Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows.

Results We present 13 guidelines with a summary of the research evidence for each. Guidelines address assessment practices (assessment design, assessment formats, use of assessments and post-hoc analysis) and educational systems and cultures (student experience, learning environment, faculty diversity and diversity practices).

Conclusions Differential attainment related to ethnicity/race is a complex, systemic problem reflective of unequal norms and practices within broader society and evident throughout assessment practices, the learning environment and student experiences at medical school. Currently, the strongest empirical evidence is around assessment processes themselves.

Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 11, 2021
Accepted on: Nov 9, 2021
Published on: Dec 29, 2021
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Molly Fyfe, Jo Horsburgh, Julia Blitz, Neville Chiavaroli, Sonia Kumar, Jennifer Cleland, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.