The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
References
- Kessner DM Kalk CE Singer J Assessing health quality—the case for tracers N Engl J Med 1973 288 189 194 10.1056/NEJM197301252880406
- Home [Internet]. Jointcommission.org. [cited 2 July, 2021]. Available from: https://www.jointcommission.org
- Siewert B The joint commission ever-readiness: Understanding tracer methodology Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018 47 131 135 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.05.002
- Introduction to on-site survey tracer methodology [Internet]. Accreditation.ca. [cited 2 July 2021]. Available from: https://store.accreditation.ca/products/introduction-to-on-site-survey-tracer-methodology
- Bouchard C Jean O Tracer methodology: an appropriate tool for assessing compliance with accreditation standards? Int J Health Plann Manage 2017 32 e299 315 10.1002/hpm.2376
- Hanskamp-Sebregts M Zegers M Westert GP Effects of patient safety auditing in hospital care: results of a mixed-method evaluation (part 1) Int J Qual Health Care 2019 31 8 15 10.1093/intqhc/mzy134
- Greenfield D Travaglia J Braithwaite J Unannounced Surveys and Tracer Methodology: Literature Review 2007 Sydney Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales
- Hinchcliff H Glennie M Travaglia J Carter D Billington L Debono D Patient Journey and Tracer Methodology: Literature review Sydney: ACSQHC 2017 1 3 5
- Meireles VC Labegalini CMG Baldissera VDA Método Tracer e a qualidade do cuidado na enfermagem: revisão integrativa da literatura Rev Gaúcha Enferm 2019 40 1 12 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180142
- Ivers N Jamtvedt G Flottorp S Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 6 CD000259
- Grant MJ Booth A A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies Health Info Libr J 2009 26 91 108 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Arksey H O’Malley L Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005 8 19 32 10.1080/1364557032000119616
- Levac D Colquhoun H O’Brien KK Scoping studies: advancing the methodology Implement Sci 2010 5 1 9 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
- Peters M Godfrey C McInerney P et al 2020 Scoping Reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis JBI
- Tricco AC Lillie E Zarin W PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation Ann Intern Med 2018 169 467 473 10.7326/M18-0850
- Better systematic review management [Internet]. Covidence.org. 2020 [cited 2 July 2021]. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/home.
- Thomas J Harden A Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 8 45 54 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
- Tong A Flemming K McInnes E Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ BMC Med Res Methodol 2012 12 181 187 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
- Smidt A Balandin S Sigafoos J The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes J Intellect Dev Disabil 2009 34 266 274 10.1080/13668250903093125
- Bhansali P Goldman E A novel peer feedback programme of family-centred rounds Clin Teach 2018 15 478 482 10.1111/tct.12742
- Blumenthal S Musche-Ambrosius I Reicherdt I Mutual Learning Process by Practice Shadowing Z Allg Med 2019 95 70 74
- Borus J Pitts S Gooding H Acceptability of peer clinical observation by faculty members Clin Teach 2018 15 309 313 10.1111/tct.12681
- Bouma J Learning experiences of frontline nurse managers shadowing a colleague; A qualitative study 2012 Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht
- Di Rocco JR, Okado CK, Kimata C, et al. Patient safety initiative using peer observations and feedback inspire collegial workplace culture. Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020;79(5 Suppl 1):112–7.
- van Dulst M De tracer-methodiek als leerinstrument 2016 Utrecht Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
- Lalleman P Bouma J Smid G Peer-to-peer shadowing as a technique for the development of nurse middle managers clinical leadership Leadersh Health Serv (bradf Engl) 2017 30 475 490 10.1108/LHS-12-2016-0065
- McDaniel CE Singh AT Beck JB Current practices and perspectives on peer observation and feedback: A national survey Acad Pediatr 2019 19 691 697 10.1016/j.acap.2019.03.005
- Fromme HB Karani R Downing SM Direct observation in medical education: a review of the literature and evidence for validity Mt Sinai J Med 2009 76 365 371 10.1002/msj.20123
- Brand PLP Jaarsma ADC van der Vleuten CPM Driving lesson or driving test? : A metaphor to help faculty separate feedback from assessment Perspect Med Educ 2021 10 50 56 10.1007/s40037-020-00617-w
- Anderson BR Kumar SR Gottlieb-Sen D The congenital heart technical skill study: Rationale and design World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2019 10 137 144 10.1177/2150135118822689
- Davies K Mitchell C Coombes I The role of observation and feedback in enhancing performance with medication administration J Law Med 2015 23 316 321
- Eden AR Hansen E Hagen MD Physician perceptions of performance feedback in a quality improvement activity Am J Med Qual 2018 33 283 290 10.1177/1062860617738327
- Hoffmann M Sendlhofer G Pregartner G Interventions to increase hand hygiene compliance in a tertiary university hospital over a period of 5 years: An iterative process of information, training and feedback J Clin Nurs 2019 28 912 919 10.1111/jocn.14703
- Maas MJM Driehuis F Meerhoff GA Impact of self- and peer assessment on the clinical performance of physiotherapists in primary care: A cohort study Physiother Can 2018 70 393 401 10.3138/ptc.2017-40.pc
- Crocetti M Kumra T Fingerhood M Coaching primary care clinicians in the ambulatory setting: Direct observation and deliberate practice Fam Med 2019 51 830 835 10.22454/FamMed.2019.791011
- Maas MJM Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, Driehuis F, et al. Feasibility of peer assessment and clinical audit to self-regulate the quality of physiotherapy services: a mixed methods study Bmj Open 2017 7 e013726 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013726
- Bowen-Brady H Haag-Heitman B Hunt V Asking for feedback: Clinical nurses’ perceptions of a peer review program in a community hospital J Nurs Adm 2019 49 35 41 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000705
- James D Weeks-O’Neal N Oh J An Investigation of Entry Level Doctor of Physical Therapy Student Perspectives of Peer Evaluation IJAHSP 2019 10.46743/1540-580X/2019.1788
- Cheung WJ Patey AM Frank JR Barriers and enablers to direct observation of trainees’ clinical performance: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework Acad Med 2019 94 101 114 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002396
- Veloski J Boex JR Grasberger MJ Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No Med Teach 2006 28 117 128 10.1080/01421590600622665
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-021-00693-6 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 21
Submitted on: Jul 5, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2021
Published on: Nov 11, 2021
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2021 Rudi A. Steenbruggen, Marjo J. M. Maas, Thomas J. Hoogeboom, Paul L. P. Brand, Philip J. van der Wees, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.