Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The contribution of simulated patients to meaningful student learning Cover

The contribution of simulated patients to meaningful student learning

Open Access
|Oct 2021

Abstract

Introduction Communication training with simulated patients (SPs) is widely accepted as a valuable and effective means of teaching communication skills. However, it is unclear which elements within SP-student encounters make these learning experiences meaningful. This study focuses on the SP’s role during meaningful learning of the student by giving an in-depth understanding of the contribution of the SP from a student perspective.

Methods Fifteen bachelor Technical Medicine students were interviewed. Technical medicine students become technical physicians who optimize individual patient care through the use of personalized technology. Their perceptions of meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters were explored through in-depth, semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results Three main themes were identified that described what students considered to be important for meaningful learning experiences. First, SPs provide implicit feedback-in-action. Through this, students received an impression of their communication during the encounter. Implicit feedback-in-action was perceived as an authentic reaction of the SPs. Second, implicit feedback-in-action could lead to a process of reflection-in-action, meaning that students reflect on their own actions during the consultation. Third, interactions with SPs contributed to students’ identity development, enabling them to know themselves on a professional and personal level.

Discussion During SP encounters, students learn more than just communication skills; the interaction with SPs contributes to their professional and personal identity development. Primarily, the authentic response of an SP during the interaction provides students an understanding of how well they communicate. This raises issues whether standardizing SPs might limit opportunities for meaningful learning.

Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 19, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jul 30, 2021
|
Published on: Oct 12, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Annelies Lovink, Marleen Groenier, Anneke van der Niet, Heleen Miedema, Jan-Joost Rethans, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.