Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Burnout and engagement among PhD students in medicine: the BEeP study Cover

Burnout and engagement among PhD students in medicine: the BEeP study

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Hypothesized model for basic psychological needs frustration and burnout

Table 1

Cluster analysis on the basis of scores on the burnout subscales (range 1–6)

Cluster

N

(%)

Exhaustion (mean ± SD)

Cynicism (mean ± SD)

Perceived negative efficacy (mean ± SD)

1

Low scores on burnout

199

(47%)

1.65 ± 0.73

1.45 ± 0.86

1.69 ± 0.67

2

Medium scores on burnout

168

(40%)

3.34 ± 0.82

3.41 ± 1.00

2.19 ± 0.52

3

High scores on burnout

 55

(13%)

3.69 ± 0.94

4.59 ± 0.85

3.62 ± 0.61

Cohen’s kappa for cluster stability = 0.95 (> 0.8 is considered good)

Table 2

Comparison of dependent variable scores between clusters (Multiple ANOVAs)

Variable

(range of scores)

Cluster 1

Low burnout scores

Cluster 2

Medium burnout scores

Cluster 3

High burnout scores

Statistical significance of ANOVA

Difference between Mean 1 and Mean 2

Difference between Mean 2 and Mean 3

Mean1±SD

(n=199)

Mean2±SD

(n=168)

Mean3±SD

(n=55)

F, η 2

significance

Effect size

(d)

Effect size

(d)

Autonomous motivation(1–5)

4.17a ± 0.38

3.90b ± 0.42

3.31c ± 0.83

 68.6, 0.256***

0.56

1.21

Controlled motivation (1–5)

1.79a ± 0.53

1.97b ± 0.62

2.37c ± 0.74

 37.4, 0.159***

0.31

0.69

Engagement (0–4)

 Vigor (0–4)

2.42a ± 0.59

1.82b ± 0.61

1.13c ± 0.61

108.8, 0.372***

1.00

1.14

 Dedication (0–4)

2.93a ± 0.45

2.42b ± 0.55

1.74c ± 0.74

114.1, 0.363***

0.95

1.27

 Absorption (0–4)

2.52a ± 0.64

2.26b ± 0.58

1.56c ± 0.76

 46.7, 0.196***

0.41

1.10

Satisfaction of BPN (1–7)

5.20a ± 0.65

4.47b ± 0.66

3.82c ± 0.85

103.7, 0.361***

1.06

0.95

 Autonomy satisfaction (1–7)

4.96a ± 0.79

3.91b ± 0.93

3.36c ± 1.08

 97.3, 0.346***

1.17

0.62

 Competence satisfaction (1–7)

5.27a ± 0.79

4.66b ± 0.84

3.55c ± 1.15

 87.1, 0.318***

0.71

1.29

 Relatedness satisfaction (1–7)

5.36a ± 1.03

4.83b ± 1.10

4.54b ± 1.36

 16.3, 0.082***

0.48

n. s.

Frustration of BPN (1–7)

2.60a ± 0.77

3.55b ± 0.71

4.24c ± 0.83

130.1, 0.429***

1.26

0.92

 Autonomy frustration (1–7)

2.98a ± 0.96

4.27b ± 0.95

4.74c ± 1.06

109.6, 0.377***

1.32

0.48

 Competence frustration (1–7)

2.72 a ± 1.05

3.62b ± 1.16

4.95c ± 1.23

 90.7, 0.347***

0.81

1.19

 Relatedness frustration (1–7)

2.11a ± 1.07

2.75b ± 1.17

3.04b ± 1.39

 21.0, 0.106***

0.56

n. s.

Work-life balance (1–3)

2.24a ± 0.56

1.82b ± 0. 55

1.93b ± 0.55

 28.6, 0.121***

0.76

n. s.

Conflict at work (1–10)

3.91a ± 2.27

5.51b ± 2.40

5.00b ± 2.66

 20.7, 0.087***

0.68

n.s

Belong to team (1–6)

4.20a ± 1.40

3.41b ± 1.50

2.61c ± 1.45

 31.4, 0.128***

0.55

0.56

Quality of sleep (0–10)

7.41a ± 1.53

6.48b ± 1.85

6.59b ± 1.71

 16.2, 0.081***

0.55

n. s.

Feeling refreshed (1–5)

3.60a ± 0.81

2.85b ± 0.91

2.61c ± 0.98

 40.6, 0.170***

0.85

0.27

Significance of the ANOVA analyses is indicated by the test value of the between clusters versus within clusters mean square (F) and the overall effect size, expressed as fraction of explained variance (η2). Cluster means with different subscripts differ statistically significant from each other (p < 0.01, Bonferroni post-hoc test). Effect sizes for the difference between cluster means (Cohen’s d) were calculated from the difference in means and the pooled standard deviation, derived from the ANOVA analyses

***p < 0.001 in all cases; n. s., not significantly different. The means which have different subscripts differ from each other significantly. The means with the same subscript do not differ significantly. BPN basic psychological needs.

Fig. 2

Structural equation model of BPN frustration and burnout. Indirect effects: Work Life Balance-Basic Psychological Needs Frustration-Exhaustion (*−0.185); Work Life Balance-Basic Psychological Needs Frustration-Cynicism (*−0.213); Work Life Balance-Basic Psychological Needs Frustration-Perceived Negative Efficacy (*−0.154)

Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 3, 2020
|
Accepted on: Nov 16, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 7, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Rashmi A. Kusurkar, Stéphanie M. E. van der Bur, Ulviye Isik, Marianne Mak-van der Vossen, Janneke Wilschut, Anouk Wouters, Andries S. Koster, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.