Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Characterizing the literature on validity and assessment in medical education: a bibliometric study Cover

Characterizing the literature on validity and assessment in medical education: a bibliometric study

Open Access
|May 2018

References

  1. 1.
    Roediger HL Karpicke JD Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention Psychol Sci 2006 17 249 255 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
  2. 2.
    Roediger HL Karpicke JD The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice Perspect Psychol Sci 2006 1 181 210 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
  3. 3.
    Larsen DP Butler AC Roediger HL III Test-enhanced learning in medical education Med Educ 2008 42 959 966 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x
  4. 4.
    Larsen DP Butler AC Roediger HL III Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomised controlled trial Med Educ 2009 43 1174 1181 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03518.x
  5. 5.
    Tamblyn R Abrahamowicz M Brailovsky C Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice J Am Med Assoc 1998 280 989 996 10.1001/jama.280.11.989
  6. 6.
    Tamblyn R Abrahamowicz M Dauphinee WD Association between lincensure examination scores and practice in primary care J Am Med Assoc 2002 288 3019 3026 10.1001/jama.288.23.3019
  7. 7.
    Tamblyn R Abrahamowicz M Dauphinee D Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities JAMA 2007 298 993 1001 10.1001/jama.298.9.993
  8. 8.
    Epstein RM Assessment in medical education N Engl J Med 2007 356 387 396 10.1056/NEJMra054784
  9. 9.
    Norcini JJ Workbased assessment BMJ 2003 326 753 755 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.753
  10. 10.
    Wass V van der Vleuten C Shatzer J Jones R Assessment of clinical competence Lancet 2001 357 945 949 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5
  11. 11.
    Sherbino J Bandiera G Frank JR Assessing competence in emergency medicine trainees : an overview of effective methodologies CMEJ 2008 10 365 371
  12. 12.
    Norcini J Anderson B Bollela V Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference Med Teach 2011 33 206 214 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559
  13. 13.
    Cizek GJ Rosenberg SL Koons HH Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests Educ Psychol Meas 2008 68 397 412 10.1177/0013164407310130
  14. 14.
    Cook DA Brydges R Zendejas B Hamstra SJ Hatala R Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality Acad Med 2013 88 872 883 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdcf
  15. 15.
    Cook DA Zendejas B Hamstra SJ Hatala R Brydges R What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014 19 233 250 10.1007/s10459-013-9458-4
  16. 16.
    Downing SM Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data Med Educ 2003 37 830 837 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
  17. 17.
    Cook DA Beckman TJ Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application Am J Med 2006 119 166e7 166e16 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
  18. 18.
    Cook DA Brydges R Ginsburg S Hatala R A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane’s framework Med Educ 2015 49 560 575 10.1111/medu.12678
  19. 19.
    Schuwirth LWT van der Vleuten CPM Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective Med Educ 2012 46 38 48 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x
  20. 20.
    Albert M Understanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological perspective Acad Med 2004 79 948 954 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00009
  21. 21.
    Albert M Hodges B Regehr G Research in medical edication: balancing service and science Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 12 103 115 10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2
  22. 22.
    St-Onge C Young M Eva KW Hodges B Validity: One word with a plurality of meanings Adv Health Sci Educ 2017 22 4 853 10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3
  23. 23.
    Streiner DL Norman G Cairney J Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 2015 5 Oxford Oxford University Press 10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
  24. 24.
    Messick S Standards of validity and the validity standards in performance assessment Educ Meas Issue Pract 1995 14 5 8 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
  25. 25.
    Kane MT Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores J Educ Meas 2013 50 1 73 10.1111/jedm.12000
  26. 26.
    Sampson M Horsley T Doja A A bibliometric analysis of evaluative medical education studies : characteristics and indexing accuracy Acad Med 2013 88 3 421 427 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182820b5c
  27. 27.
    Broadus R Towards a definition of “bibliometrics.” Scientometrics 1987 12 373 379 10.1007/BF02016680
  28. 28.
    Okubo Y Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and examples 1997 10.1787/208277770603
  29. 29.
    Doja A Horsley T Sampson M Productivity in medical education research : an examination of countries of origin BMC Med. Educ. 2014 14 1 9 10.1186/1472-6920-14-1
  30. 30.
    Azer SA The top-cited articles in medical education : a bibliometric analysis Acad Med 2015 90 1147 1161 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000780
  31. 31.
    Smith DR Bibliometrics, citation indexing, and the journals of nursing Nurs Health Sci 2008 10 260 264 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2008.00414.x
  32. 32.
    Macintosh-Murray A Perrier L Davis D Research to practice in the journal of continuing education in the health professions: a thematic analysis of volumes 1 through 24 J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006 26 230 243 10.1002/chp.76
  33. 33.
    AERA, APA, NCME (American Educational Research Association & National Council on Measurement in Education) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing APA Standards for educational and psychological testing 1999 Washington, DC AERA
  34. 34.
    Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman DG The PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med. 2009 6 7 e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  35. 35.
    World Directory of Medical Schools. World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) and the Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER). (https://search.wdoms.org). Updated 2015. Accessed May 10, 2017.
  36. 36.
    U.S. National Library of Medicine. Broad Subject Terms for Indexed Journals. (https://wwwcf.nlm.nih.gov/serials/journals/index.cfm). Published February 15, 2009. Updated Hanuary 24, 2017. Accessed May 10, 2017.
  37. 37.
    St-Onge C Young M Evolving conceptualisations of validity: impact on the process and outcome of assessment Med Educ 2015 49 6 548 550 10.1111/medu.12734
  38. 38.
    Young ME Thomas A Lubarsky S Drawing boundaries: The difficulty of defining clinical reasoning Acad Med 2018
  39. 39.
    Cizek G Defining and distinguishing validity: interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use Psychol. Methods. 2012 17 31 43 10.1037/a0026975
Language: English
Published on: May 23, 2018
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Meredith Young, Christina St-Onge, Jing Xiao, Elise Vachon Lachiver, Nazi Torabi, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.