Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education Cover

The rationale for and use of assessment frameworks: improving assessment and reporting quality in medical education

Open Access
|May 2015

References

  1. AMAC. Assessment Framework. Australian Council for Educational Research. 2012. http://www.acer.edu.au/files/AMAC_Framework_May_2012. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  2. Jago C. A history of NEAP assessment frameworks 2009 Washington National Assessment Governing Board (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED509382)
  3. Kane M. Current concerns in validity theory J Educ Meas 2001 38 319 42 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x
  4. Kane M. Validation. In: Brennan R, editor. Educational Measurement. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger; 2006. p. 7–64.
  5. Schuwirth LWT van der Vleuten CPM Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective Med Educ 2012 46 38 48 22150195 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x
  6. Amin Z. Purposeful assessment Med Educ 2012 46 3 12 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04170.x
  7. Lurie SJ History and practice of competency-based assessment Med Educ 2012 46 49 57 22150196 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04142.x
  8. Ten Cate O Snell L Carraccio C. Medical competence: the interplay between individual ability and the health care environment Med Teach 2010 32 669 75 20662579 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500897
  9. Colliver JA Conlee MJ Verhulst SJ From test validity to construct validity … and back? Med Educ 2012 46 366 71 22429172 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04194.x
  10. Lurie SJ Mooney C Lyness J. Pitfalls in assessment of competency-based educational objectives Acad Med 2011 86 412 4 21451271 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cdb28
  11. Norman G Swanson D Case S. Conceptual and methodological issues in comparing item formats Teach Learn Med 1996 8 208 16 10.1080/10401339609539799
  12. Schuwirth LWT van der Vleuten CPM Donkers H. Harden R Hart I Mulholland H Open-ended questions versus multiple-choice questions Approaches to the assessment of clinical competence proceedings of the fifth Ottowa conference 1992 Norwich Page Brothers 486 91
  13. Schuwirth L, Pearce J. Determining the quality of assessment items in collaborations: aspects to discuss to reach agreement. Australian medical assessment collaboration: 2014.
  14. Pearce J. Ensuring quality in AHELO item development and scoring processes. In: Musekamp F, Spöttle G, editors. Vocational Education and Training: Research and Practice: Vol. 12. Kompetenz im Studium und in der Arbeitswelt. Nationale und internationale Ansätze zur Erfassung von Ingenieurkompetenzen. Competence in Higher Education and the Working Environment. National and International Approaches for Assessing Engineering Competence. (1st ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 2014.
  15. Musekamp F, Pearce J. Assessing engineering competencies: the conditions for educational improvement. Stud High Educ. 2015. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1004238.
  16. Schuwirth L Bosman G Henning R Rinkel R Wenink A. Collaboration on progress testing in medical schools in the Netherlands Med Teach 2010 32 476 9 20515376 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485658
  17. Schuwirth L. The need for national licensing examinations Med Educ 2007 41 1022 3 17973761 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02856.x
  18. Wilkinson D Canny B Pearce J Coates H Edwards D. Assessment of medical students’ learning outcomes in Australia: current practice, future possibilities Med J Australia 2013 199 578 80 24182212 10.5694/mja13.10061
  19. CPMEC. Australian curriculum framework for junior doctors. 2008. http://www.cpmec.org.au/ACF-2010/index.cfm. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  20. NFU. The 2009 Framework for undergraduate medical education in the Netherlands. 2009. http://www.nfu.nl/fileadmin/documents/Raamplan2009engelstalige_versie.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  21. AMA. Position Statement: Competency-based training in medical education. Australian medical association. 2010. http://ama.com.au/node/5977. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  22. Van der Vleuten C Schuwirth L Scheele F Driessen E Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development Best Pract Res Cl Ob 2010 24 703 19 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfotFaiug%3D%3D 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001
  23. Archer J. European licensing examinations—the only way forward Med Teach 2009 31 215 6 19811118 10.1080/01421590902741148
  24. Gorsira M. The utility of (European) licensing examinations Med Teach 2009 31 221 2 19811120 10.1080/01421590902741189
  25. Melnick D. Licensing examinations in North America: is external audit valuable? Med Teach 2009 31 212 4 19811117 10.1080/01421590902741163
  26. van der Vleuten C National, European licensing examinations or none at all? Med Teach 2009 31 189 91 19811114 10.1080/01421590902741171
  27. OECD. Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) feasibility study. Paris: organisation for economic cooperation and development. 2010. http://www.oecd.org/edu/ahelo. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  28. AHELO Consortium. Economics assessment framework. Paris: organisation for economic cooperation and development. 2011.
  29. AHELO Consortium. Engineering assessment framework. Paris: organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2011.
  30. AHELO Consortium. Generic skills assessment framework. Paris: organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2012.
  31. OECD. PISA assessment framework. Paris: organisation for economic cooperation and development. 2009.
  32. Edwards D, Schuwirth L. Implementing common assessment: lessons and models from AMAC. Australian medical assessment collaboration. 2014.
  33. Canny B, Coates H. Governance models for collaborations involving assessment. australian medical assessment collaboration. 2014.
  34. Edwards D. The Australian medical assessment collaboration: from proof of concept to proof of sustainability (Final Report). Australian medical assessment collaboration. 2014.
  35. Pearce J, Edwards D. Collaborative assessment of learning outcomes: generation positive institutional change. ICED 2014 Conference; 2014; Stockholm, Sweden.
  36. Edwards D Pearce J. Coates H Outcomes assessment in practice—reflections on implementation of two different models Assessing learning outcomes: perspectives for quality improvement 2014 Frankfurt am Main Peter Lang
  37. DEEWR. What makes for success in medical education: australian medical education study. canberra: department of education, employment and workplace relations. 2008.
  38. CanMEDS. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician competency framework. Ottawa: The Royal college of physicians and surgeons of Canada. 2005. http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/bestpractices/framework_e.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  39. AMC. Multiple choice examination specifications booklet. 2011. http://www.amc.org.au/images/publications/amc_exam_spec.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  40. MDANZ. Developing a framework of competencies for medical graduate outcomes. 2011. http://www.medicaldeans.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Competencies-Project-Final-Report1.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  41. Cumming A, Ross M. The tuning project (medicine)—Learning outcomes/competences for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Edinburgh: University of Edinburg; 2009.
  42. Miller G. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance Acad Med 1990 65 63 7 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
  43. Aaron S. Moving up the pyramid: assessing performance in the Clinic J Rheumatol 2009 36 1101 3 19509087 10.3899/jrheum.090085
  44. Edwards D Wilkinson D Canny B Pearce J Coates H. Developing outcomes assessments for collaborative, cross-institutional benchmarking: progress of the Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration Med Teach 2014 36 2 139 47 24171466 10.3109/0142159X.2013.849798
  45. Kipp MEI Campbell DG Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: an examination of tagging practices P Am Soc Inform Sci Tech 2007 43 1 1 18 10.1002/meet.14504301178
  46. Heckner M, Mühlbacher S, Wolff C. Tagging tagging: analysing user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems. J Digit Inf. 2008;9(2).
  47. NBME. International foundations of medicine clinical science examination 2010 content outline. 2010. [28 Jan 2013]. http://nbme.org/pdf/ifom/IFOM_ContentOutline_highleveldesc_ENG.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug. 2014.
  48. Fernandez N Dory V Ste-Marie L-G Chaput M Charlin B Boucher A. Varying conceptions of competence: an analysis of how health science educators define competence Med Educ 2012 46 357 65 22429171 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04183.x
Language: English
Published on: May 12, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2015 Jacob Pearce, Daniel Edwards, Julian Fraillon, Hamish Coates, Benedict J. Canny, David David Wilkinson, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.