Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Use of a group concept mapping approach to define learning outcomes for an interdisciplinary module in medicine Cover

Use of a group concept mapping approach to define learning outcomes for an interdisciplinary module in medicine

Open Access
|Dec 2013

References

  1. 1.
    Hanumara M, Walsh C, Osborn L, Slocum A. Solving medical challenges while teaching mechanical engineering design. ASME J Mech Des, 2013 (in press).
  2. 2.
    Bright A Phillips JR The harvey mudd engineering clinic: past present and future Int J Eng Educ. 1999 88 189 194 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00434.x
  3. 3.
    Cantillon-Murphy P, McSweeney J, Burgoyne L, O’Tuathaigh C, O’Flynn S. Solving clinical problems through interdisciplinary learning: an initial feasibility study. Int J Eng Educ. 2013 (in press).
  4. 4.
    ECTS Users’ Guide (2009), Brussels: Directorate-General for Education and Culture. http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/ects/guide_en.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Biggs J, Tang C (2009) Applying constructive alignment to outcomes based teaching and learning. http://drjj.uitm.edu.my/DRJJ/MQAGGPAS-Apr2011/What-is-CA-biggs-tang.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Kordi R Dennick RG Scammell BE Developing learning outcomes for an ideal MSc course in sports and exercise medicine Br J Sports Med 2005 39 20 23 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnktFGksg%3D%3D 1725026 15618334 10.1136/bjsm.2003.009969
  7. 7.
    Tonni I Oliver R A Delphi approach to define learning outcomes and assessment Eur J Dent Educ 2013 17 173 180 10.1111/eje.12000
  8. 8.
    Schiekirka S Reinhardt D Beibbarth T Anders S Pukrop T Raupach T Estimating learning outcomes from pre- and posttest student self-assessments: a longitudinal study Acad Med 2013 88 3 369 375 23348083 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280a6f6
  9. 9.
    Johnson O Bailey ST Willcott C Global health learning outcomes for medical students in the UK Lancet 2012 379 9831 2033 2035 22019145 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61582-1
  10. 10.
    Burke S Martin M Thomas H Farndon P The development of core learning outcomes relevant to clinical practice: identifying priority areas for genetics education for non-genetics specialist registrars Clin Med 2009 9 1 49 52 19271601 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-49
  11. 11.
    Trochim WMK An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation Eval Program Plann. 1989 12 1 1 16 10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5
  12. 12.
    Trochim MK Trochim WMK Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Applied social research methods series 2007 xv Thousand Oaks Sage 200
  13. 13.
    Rosas SR Kane M Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis Eval Program Plann. 2012 35 236 245 22221889 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003
  14. 14.
    Sturrock K Rocha J A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table Field Methods. 2000 12 1 49 60 10.1177/1525822X0001200104
  15. 15.
    Turner CW Lewis JR Nielsen J Karwowski Determining usability test sample size International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors 2006 Boca Raton CRC
  16. 16.
    General Medical Council UK. Tomorrows Doctors, outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education; 2009.
  17. 17.
    Scottish Deans Medical Education Group. 3. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Deans Medical Education Group; 2009. The Scottish Doctor: learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners.
  18. 18.
    National Alliance for Physician Competence. Good medical practice—USA: the National Alliance. Version 1.0. 2007. http://www.gmpusa.org.
Language: English
Published on: Dec 10, 2013
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2013 Slavi Stoyanov, Howard Spoelstra, Deirdre Bennett, Catherine Sweeney, Sabine Van Huffel, George Shorten, Siun O’Flynn, Padraig Cantillon-Murphy, Colm O’Tuathaigh, Louise Burgoyne, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.