Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Explicit feedback to enhance the effect of an interim assessment: a cross-over study on learning effect and gender difference Cover

Explicit feedback to enhance the effect of an interim assessment: a cross-over study on learning effect and gender difference

Open Access
|Sep 2012

References

  1. 1.
    Swanwick T. Introduction: understanding medical education. In: Swanwick T, Buckley G, editors. Understanding medical education. Evidence, theory and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, London; 2010, pp. xv–xviii.
  2. 2.
    Krupat E Dienstag JL Commentary: assessment is an educational tool Acad Med 2009 84 5 548 550 19704183 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819f7fb9
  3. 3.
    Karpicke JD Roediger HL 3rd The critical importance of retrieval for learning Science 2008 319 5865 966 968 18276894 10.1126/science.1152408 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhslOmt7Y%3D
  4. 4.
    Roediger HL Karpicke JD Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention Psychol Sci 2006 17 3 249 255 16507066 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
  5. 5.
    Larsen DP Butler AC Roediger HL 3rd Test-enhanced learning in medical education Med Educ 2008 42 10 959 966 18823514 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x
  6. 6.
    Larsen DP Butler AC Roediger HL 3rd Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomised controlled trial Med Educ 2009 43 12 1174 1181 19930508 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03518.x
  7. 7.
    Olde Bekkink M Donders R van Muijen GN Ruiter DJ Challenging medical students with an interim assessment: a positive effect on formal examination score in a randomized controlled study Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012 17 1 27 37 21442416 10.1007/s10459-011-9291-6
  8. 8.
    Wood T Assessment not only drives learning, it may also help learning Med Educ 2009 43 1 5 6 19140992 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03237.x
  9. 9.
    Sinclair HK Cleland JA Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? Med Educ 2007 41 6 580 582 17518838 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02768.x
  10. 10.
    van de Ridder JM Stokking KM McGaghie WC ten Cate OT What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 2008 42 2 189 197 18230092 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
  11. 11.
    Hattie J Timperley H The power of feedback Rev Educ Res 2007 77 81 110 10.3102/003465430298487
  12. 12.
    van der Vleuten CP Schuwirth LW Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes Med Educ 2005 39 3 309 317 15733167 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
  13. 13.
    Wood DF Swanwick T Buckley G Formative assessment Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice 2010 London Wiley-Blackwell 259 270 10.1002/9781444320282.ch18
  14. 14.
    McIlwrick J Nair B Montgomery G ‘How am I doing?’: many problems but few solutions related to feedback delivery in undergraduate psychiatry education Acad Psychiatry 2006 30 2 130 135 16609119 10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.130
  15. 15.
    Veloski J Boex JR Grasberger MJ Evans A Wolfson DB Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME guide no. 7 Med Teach 2006 28 2 117 128 16707292 10.1080/01421590600622665
  16. 16.
    Nicol DJ Macfarlane-Dick D Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice Stud High Educ 2006 31 2 199 218 10.1080/03075070600572090
  17. 17.
    Pocock SJ Simon R Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial Biometrics 1975 31 1 103 115 1100130 10.2307/2529712 1:STN:280:DyaE28%2FhvFeisQ%3D%3D
  18. 18.
    Borm GF Hoogendoorn EH den Heijer M Zielhuis GA Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials Contemp Clin Trials 2005 26 6 637 645 16226925 10.1016/j.cct.2005.09.002
  19. 19.
    Kusurkar R Kruitwagen C ten Cate O Croiset G Effects of age, gender and educational background on strength of motivation for medical school Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010 15 3 303 313 19774476 10.1007/s10459-009-9198-7
  20. 20.
    Kanter SL Ethical approval for studies involving human participants: academic medicine’s new policy Acad Med 2009 84 2 149 150 19174645 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318198c40f
  21. 21.
    Eva KW Research ethics requirements for medical education Med Educ 2009 43 3 194 195 19250343 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03285.x
  22. 22.
    World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, adopted in 1964, readopted and revised in 2008, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf.
  23. 23.
    Eva KW Armson H Holmboe E Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012 17 1 15 26 21468778 10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7
  24. 24.
    Murdoch-Eaton D Feedback: the complexity of self-perception and the transition from ‘transmit’ to ‘received and understood’ Med Educ 2012 46 6 538 540 22626043
  25. 25.
    Michael J Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ 2006 30 4 159 167 17108243 10.1152/advan.00053.2006
  26. 26.
    Norman GR Schmidt HG The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence Acad Med 1992 67 9 557 565 1520409 10.1097/00001888-199209000-00002 1:STN:280:DyaK38zpt1Cgsw%3D%3D
  27. 27.
    Van Berkel HJ Dolmans DH The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning Med Educ 2006 40 8 730 736 16869917 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02530.x
  28. 28.
    Garrison DR Self-directed learning: toward a comprehensive model Adult Educ Q 1997 48 18 33 10.1177/074171369704800103
  29. 29.
    Gibbs G, Simpson C. Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learn Teach High Educ. 2004–2005;1:3–31.
  30. 30.
    Kulhavy RW Feedback in written instructions Rev Educ Res 1977 47 211 232
  31. 31.
    Murdoch-Eaton D Sargeant J Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students’ perceptions about feedback Med Educ 2012 46 7 711 721 22691150 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04291.x
  32. 32.
    van Mook WN Muijtjens AM Gorter SL Zwaveling JH Schuwirth LW van der Vleuten CP Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012 17 1 81 93 21533755 10.1007/s10459-011-9297-0
  33. 33.
    Cook DA Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: what role do they play? Med Teach 2012 34 6 468 473 22489980 10.3109/0142159X.2012.671978
  34. 34.
    Cook DA If you teach them, they will learn: why medical education needs comparative effectiveness research Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012 17 3 305 310 22696095 10.1007/s10459-012-9381-0
  35. 35.
    Norman GR Eva KW Swanwick T Buckley G Quantitative research methods in medical education Understanding medical education. Evidence, theory and practice 2010 London Wiley-Blackwell 301 322 10.1002/9781444320282.ch21
Language: English
Published on: Sep 27, 2012
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2012 Marleen Olde Bekkink, Rogier Donders, Goos N. P. van Muijen, Rob M. W. de Waal, Dirk J. Ruiter, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.