Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Natural Aging of Ink and Ink Fading Are Different Physical and Chemical Processes: A Document Dating Case Report Cover

Natural Aging of Ink and Ink Fading Are Different Physical and Chemical Processes: A Document Dating Case Report

Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination. SWGDOC standard for test methods for forensic writing ink comparison, Ver. 2013–1; 2013.
  2. Aginsky VN. Mechanism and kinetics of the aging of some ink dyes. In Jacob B & Bonte W, (Eds.) Advances in forensic sciences, Vol. 3, Forensic Criminalistics, Proceedings of the 13th Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, Dusseldorf 1993. Berlin: Verlag Dr. Koster; 1995. pp. 320321.
  3. Aginsky VN. A Microspectrophotometric method for dating ballpoint inks – A feasibility study. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1995;40(3):475478. DOI: 10.1520/JFS13808J
  4. Aginsky VN. Current methods for dating ink on documents. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Conference of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, San Diego, California, August 14–19; 2002.
  5. Aginsky VN. Writing media and documents. In: Bogucz MJ (Ed.) Handbook of analytical separations. Vol. 6, Forensic science, Chapter 27, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. DOI: 10.1016/S1567-7192(06)06027-X
  6. Harada H. A rapid identification of black colour materials with specific reference to ballpoint ink and Indian ink. Journal of the Forensic Science Society. 1988;28(3):167177. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-7368(88)72826-1
  7. Sakayanagi M, Komuro J, Konda Y, Watanabe K, Harigaya Y. Analysis of ballpoint pen inks by field desorption mass spectrometry. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1999;44(6):12041214. DOI: 10.1520/JFS14588J
  8. Andrasko J. HPLC analysis of ballpoint pen inks stored at different light conditions. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2001;46:2130. DOI: 10.1520/JFS14907J
  9. Grim DM, Siegel J, Allison J. Evaluation of desorption/ionization mass spectrometric methods in the forensic applications of the analysis of inks on paper. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2001;46(6):14111420. DOI: 10.1520/JFS15164J
  10. Weyermann C. Mass spectrometric investigation of the aging processes of ballpoint ink for the examination of questioned documents. Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, Justus-Liebig University, Inaugural dissertation, September 2005, Giessen, Germany; 2005. 206p.
  11. Weyermann C, Marquis R, Mazzella W, Spengler B. Differentiation of blue ballpoint pen inks by laser desorption ionization mass-spectrometry and high-performance thin-layer chromatography. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2007;52:216220. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00303.x
  12. Neumann C. New perspectives in the use of ink evidence in forensic science, PhD thesis. Lausanne, Switzerland: University of Lausanne; 2008. p. 33.
  13. Lalli PM, et al. Fingerprinting and aging of ink by easy ambient sonicspray ionization mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2010;135(4):745750. DOI: 10.1039/b923398a
  14. Xu C. Evaluation of the aging behavior of crystal violet in ballpoint pen ink entries by LC-MS/MS. In: Proceedings of the 19th IAFS World Meeting, September 12–17. Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; 2011.
  15. Williamson C. The analysis of ballpoint inks with APCI-MS after fading with light, hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite bleach. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire, September 2015.
  16. Amador V, et al. Paper spray mass spectrometry for the forensic analysis of black ballpoint pen inks. Journal of the American Society of Mass Spectrometry. 2017;28:19651976. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1686-z
  17. Aginsky VN. Thin-layer chromatography of inks – Efficiency of separation of ink components. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2019;22(2):1321. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.259
  18. Aginsky VN. A new application of instrumental planar thin-layer chromatography in forensic analysis. Journal of Planar Chromatography. 1991;4:167169.
  19. Aginsky VN. Forensic examination of “slightly soluble” inks pigments using thin-layer chromatography. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1993;38(5):11311133. DOI: 10.1520/JFS13516J
  20. Aginsky VN. Dating and characterizing writing, stamp pad and jet printer inks by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners. 1996;2(2):103115.
  21. Cantu A. A sketch of analytical methods for document dating. Part II. The dynamic approach: Determining age dependent analytical profiles. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners. 1996;2(3):192208.
  22. Cantu A. On the behavior of certain ink aging curves. Forensic Science International. 2017;278:269279. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.011
  23. Gaudreau M, Brazeau L. Ink dating using a solvent loss ratio method. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Conference of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, San Diego, California, August 14–19, 2002.
  24. Gaudreau M, Aginsky VN. Essentials of the solvent loss ratio method. In: Proceedings of the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Victoria, BC, August 28–September 2, 2010.
  25. Aginsky VN. Ink aging testing – Do preceding indentation examinations affect ink aging parameters? Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2014;17(2):4963. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.210
  26. Aginsky VN. Scope of applicability of the ink aging methodology that measures the loss of high boiling solvents from oil- and water-based inks on paper. In: Proceedings of the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, San Diego, CA, August 28–September 1, 2017.
  27. Aginsky VN. Dating water-based inks on documents – Rollerball pen inks containing pyrrolidone. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2017;20(2):1130. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.240
  28. CBSA documents submitted by Marc Gaudreau (while employed as a private document examiner) in Quality Home Health Care, Inc. v. James L. Stollings, Sr. et al., Circuit Court of Kenosha County, State of Wisconsin, Case 12-CV-0801.
  29. Aginsky VN. Ink dating – Essentials and scope of applicability of the solvent loss ratio method (SLRM) (letter to the editor). Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2019;22(2):37. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.257
  30. Koenig A, Bügler J, Kirsch D, Köhler F, Weyermann, C. Ink dating using thermal desorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: Comparison of results obtained in two laboratories. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2015;60(1):152161. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12603
  31. Koenig A. Ink dating using solvent analysis: Toward the development of a transparent method. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lausanne, Faculté de droit, des sciences criminelles et d’administration publique, March 28, 2017.
  32. Koenig A, Weyermann C. Ink dating, part I: Statistical distribution of selected ageing parameters in a ballpoint ink reference population. Science & Justice. 2018;58(1):1730. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.08.002
  33. Lociciro S, Mazzella W, Dujourdy L, Lock E, Margot P. Dynamic of the ageing of ballpoint pen inks: Quantification of phenoxyethanol by GC-MS. Science & Justice. 2004;44(3):165171. DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(04)71709-8
  34. Bügler JH, Buchner H, Dallmayer A. Age determination of ballpoint pen inks. In: ENFSI (Ed.) 4th Conference of the European Document Examiners Working Group (EDEWG). The Hague, Netherlands; 2006.
  35. Bügler JH. Method validation for age determination of ballpoint inks. In: ENFSI (Ed.), 5th Annual Conference of the European Document Experts Working Group (EDEWG). Bunratty, Ireland; 2008.
  36. Bügler JH, Buchner H, Dallmayer A. Age determination of ballpoint pen ink by thermal desorption and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2008;53(4):982988. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00745.x
  37. Bügler JH. Age dependent parameters – Solvent analysis. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Experts in Forensic Document Analysis (SIPDO 2012), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, October 23–26, 2012.
  38. Aginsky VN. Examination of paper and toner in page insertion/substitution cases using TLC, GC-MS and FT-IR microspectroscopy. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2012;15(2):315. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.187
  39. Aginsky VN. Ink dating – The essentials of the sequential extraction technique. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Experts in Forensic Document Analysis (SIPDO 2012), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, October 23–26, 2012.
  40. Aginsky VN. Ink dating – The essentials of the sequential solvent extraction technique (SET). In: Proceedings of the 78th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, ASQDE Virtual Meeting, August 10–14, 2020.
  41. Lin L, et al. Thin-layer chromatography of mycotoxins and comparison with other chromatographic methods. Journal of Chromatography A. 1998;815:320. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00204-0
  42. Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Dolan JW. Introduction to modern liquid chromatography, 3rd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010. p. 10. DOI: 10.1002/9780470508183
  43. Striegel MF, Hill J. Thin-layer chromatography for binding media analysis. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Conservation Institute, The J. Paul Getty Trust; 1996. pp. 6, 71, 72.
  44. Sharma BK. Industrial chemistry (including chemical engineering). Meerut, India: GOEL Publishing House; 1991. 1597p.
  45. Lam Wai Lik Eric et al. v. Tam Suet Mui. Probate action HCAP 5/2015, High Court, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Date of Judgment: 14 December 2020.
  46. Aginsky VN, Zibrov GS, Sorokina GI. Analysis of drugs, inks, petroleum products, and explosives by reversed phase thin-layer chromatography. Moscow, Russia: Forensic Science Center of the Russia’s Ministry of the Interior; 1993 (in Russian).
  47. Aginsky VN, Safronenko TI, Sorokina GI. Forensic examination of questioned documents. Moscow, USSR: VNII MVD SSSR; 1987 (in Russian).
  48. Aginsky VN. Microscopic method for determining the size of toner particles in page substitution and document dating cases. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2019;22(2):2331. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.260
  49. Óscar D-S, et al. The use of crystal violet degradation products for ballpoint pen ink manuscript dating. Molecules. 2023;28(17):6429. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28176429
  50. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination. SWGDOC standard for writing ink identification, Ver. 2013–1; 2013.
  51. Weyermann C, Kirsch D, Costa-Vera C, Spengler B. Photofading of ballpoint dyes studied on paper by LDI and MALDI MS. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2006;17(3):297306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.11.010
  52. Tuchinda C, Srivannaboon S, Lim HW. Photoprotection by window glass, automobile glass, and sunglasses. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2006;54:845854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1082
  53. Weyermann C, Almog J, Bügler J, Cantu AA. Minimum requirements for application of ink dating methods based on solvent analysis in casework. Forensic Science International. 2011;210:5262. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.034
  54. Protect your car from the damaging effect of sun and heat. State Farm®, Jan. 18, 2022 (https://www.statefarm.com/simple-insights/auto-and-vehicles/protect-your-car-from-the-damaging-effects-of-sun-and-heat)
  55. Bügler JH, Buchner H, Dallmayer A. Age determination of ballpoint ink by thermal desorption and GC-MS. In: Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Conference of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Montreal, Quebec, August 11–16, 2005.
  56. Aginsky VN. Accelerated aging – Its use in methods for dating ink. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners. 1996;2(3):179181.
  57. Aginsky VN. Some new ideas for dating ballpoint inks – A feasibility study. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1993;38(5):11341150. DOI: 10.1520/JFS13517J
  58. Aginsky VN. Ink dating – Comparative examination of inks on documents using optical and chemical methods. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2013;16(1):3138. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.194
  59. Lindblom BS. Pen and pencils. In JS Kelly & BS Lindblom (Eds.) Scientific examination of questioned documents. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2006. p. 149. DOI: 10.1201/9781420003765.ch13
  60. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination. SWGDOC terminology for expressing conclusions of forensic document examiners, Ver. 2013–1; 2013.
  61. Aginsky VN. Natural aging of ink and ink fading are different physical and chemical processes – A document dating case report. In: Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Atlanta, GA, August 2024.
  62. Aginsky VN. Measuring ink extractability as a function of age – Why the relative aging approach is unreliable and why it is more correct to measure ink volatile components than dyes. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners. 1998;4(3):214230.
  63. Cantu AA. Comments on the accelerated aging of ink. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1988;33(3):744750. DOI: 10.1520/JFS12483J
  64. Farnood R. Optical properties of paper: Theory and practice. In: SJ I’Anson (Ed.) Advances in pulp and paper research. Transactions of the XIVth Fundamental Research Symposium, Oxford, 2009. Manchester: FRC; 2018. pp. 273352. DOI: 10.15376/frc.2009.1.273
  65. Aginsky VN. Determining the sequence of non-intersecting media on documents: Ballpoint pen ink and laser toner entries. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2002;5(1):14. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.75
  66. Wang Y, Yao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Wang Y. Determining the relative age of blue ballpoint ink by gas chromatography. Frontiers of Chemistry in China. 2006;2:223226; Chinese Journal of Chromatography. 2005;23:202–205. DOI: 10.1007/s11458-006-0014-o
  67. Brazeau L, Gaudreau M. Ballpoint pen inks: The quantitative analysis of ink solvents on paper by solid-phase microextraction. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2007;52(1):209215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00299.x
  68. Weyermann C, Kirsch D, Vera CC, Spengler B. A GC/MS study of the drying of ballpoint pen ink on paper. Forensic Science International. 2007;168:119127. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.076
  69. Ezcurra M, Gongora JMG, Maguregui I, Alonso R. Evaluation of loss of phenoxyethanol from a ballpoint pen ink over time by GC-MS depending on the location of the signature on the document. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 2010;13(1):914. DOI: 10.69525/jasqde.167
  70. Kirsch D, Seiler P, Anheier B, Köhler F. Approaches for dating of ballpoint ink entries. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Experts in Forensic Document Analysis (SIPDO 2012), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, October 23–26, 2012.
  71. Koenig A, Weyermann C. Ink aging on paper using GC/MS – Perspectives for document dating. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Experts in Forensic Document Analysis (SIPDO 2012), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, October 23–26, 2012.
  72. Koenig A, Magolon S, Weyermann C. A comparative study of ballpoint ink aging parameters using GC/MS. Forensic Science International. 2015;252:93106. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.03.027
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.292 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Submitted on: Jun 20, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 14, 2025
Published on: Aug 20, 2025
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Valery N. Aginsky, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.