References
- Doud, D., (1981).
Examination of union authorization card signatures . American Society of Document Examiners 1981 meeting. Houston, Texas. - Estabrooks, C.,(2000). Measuring relative pen pressure to authenticate signatures. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.3(2):57–65.
- Evett, I., & Totty, R., (1985). A study of the variation in the dimensions of genuine signatures. Journal of Forensic Science Society. 25:207–215.
- Franke, K., (2009).
Analysis of authentic signatures and forgeries . In Z.J.M.H. Geradts, K.Y. Franke and C.J. Veenman (Eds.),Computational Forensics (150164 ). Berlin: Heidelberg, Springer - Verlag. - Government of Canada (2010).
Adult General Passport Application . Ottawa: Passport Canada. - Hook, C., Kempf, J., & Scharfenberg, G.,(2003). New pen device for biometrical 3D pressure analysis of handwritten characters, words and signatures. WBMA 2003 Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMM workshop on Biometrics methods and applications. ACM. New York, New York.
- Lacy, G., (1961). The significance of location of a signature on a document. American Society of Questioned Document Examiners 1961 Conference. Los Angeles, California.
- Mohammed, L.A., Caligiuri, M.P. (2010, August). Study 3 - genuine, disguised and simulated signatures. American Society of Questioned Document Examiners 2010 meeting, Victoria, BC, Canada.
- Mohammed, L.A., Caligiuri, M.P. (2010, August). Study 4 – pen pressure. American Society of Questioned Document Examiners 2010 meeting, Victoria, BC, Canada.
- Mohammed, L.A., Found, B., Caligiuri, M., Rogers, D. (2009). Pen pressure as a discriminatory Feature between Genuine and Forged Signatures. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Graphonomics Society (26–29). Dijon, France.
- Mohammed, L.A., Found, B., Caligiuri, M., Rogers, D. (2010). The dynamic character of disguise behaviour for text-based, mixed and stylized signatures. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 56(S1). S136–S141.
- Morton, S.E., (1980). How does crowding affect signatures? Journal of Forensic Sciences. 25(1).
141145 . - Ostrum, R.B., Tanaka, T.A. (2006). Another look at handwriting movement. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 9(2):57–69.
- Ruenes, R.F., (1968). Shrinking and stretching of handwriting. American Society of Questioned Document Examiners 1968 meeting. Lexington, Kentucky.
- Simsons, D., Spencer, R., Auer, S. (2011). The effects of constraining signatures. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 14(1):39–50.
- Sita, J., Found, B., Rogers, D. (2002). Forensic handwriting examiners’ expertise for signature comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 47:
111724 . - Sita, J., Rogers D., Found, B (2003). A model using complexity classification, spatial score and line quality for forensic signature comparison. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Graphonomics Society. Scottsdale, Arizona.
- Van Gemmert, A., Van Galen G., Hardy H., & Thomassen, A. (1996). Dynamical features of disguised handwriting. Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference for Police and Government Handwriting Experts
November 13–15 ; The Hague,The Netherlands European Network of Forensic Handwriting Experts .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.214 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 56
Published on: Jun 1, 2015
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2015 Kristen Fazio, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.