Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Discounted LCA and Economic Assessment of Heat Pumps and PV in HORECA Laundry Services Cover

Discounted LCA and Economic Assessment of Heat Pumps and PV in HORECA Laundry Services

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Annual per-machine consumption estimates disaggregated from utility monitoring (May 2024–April 2025).

MACHINE IDCAPACITY (kg)CYCLES/YEARELECTRICITY (kWh/y)GAS (Sm3/y)WATER (m3/y)COST/CYCLE RANGE (€)
W-5102,1216803592120.21–0.29
W-6132,2137103742210.21–0.31
W-7162,1611,3876213670.29–0.46
W-8202,3151,4856653940.29–0.50
W-9252,0511,7957634510.35–0.62
W-16 (pet)1073522199590.21–0.30
D-10232,1231,0301,5600.45–1.15
D-11231,6273907910.45–0.97
D-12163,9288251,1150.37–0.62
D-13165,4648321,1250.37–0.62
D-14163,9628321,1250.37–0.62
D-15166,5631,3781,8640.37–0.62
D-17 (pet)1650935600.28–0.45
Fixed loads5,287083
TOTAL35,77217,524 kWh10,888 Sm31,787 m3
Table 2

PESTEL-derived SDR derivation matrix.

PESTEL DIMENSIONRISK/URGENCY ASSESSMENTRISK LEVELSUB-RATE (%)WEIGHT
Political (P)EU energy policy stability (RED III, ETS2, Fit for 55); Italian regulatory frameworkLow3.5%1/6
Economic (E)Italian energy price volatility; gas-electricity price ratio; ECB reference rate 3.5%; SME access to capitalModerate-High6.0%1/6
Social (S)Public health urgency (PM2.5, NOx); public support for energy transition; HORECA sector awarenessModerate5.0%1/6
Technological (T)Grid decarbonisation rate; HP/PV learning curves; ecoinvent inventory update cyclesLow-Moderate4.5%1/6
Environmental (E)Social cost of carbon (€130–180/tCO2); climate tipping points; R32 refrigerant end-of-lifeHigh7.5%1/6
Legal (L)EU ETS2 (from 2027); CSRD Scope 3 obligations; Energy Efficiency Directive (EU) 2023/1791Moderate-High7.0%1/6
Composite SDRArithmetic mean of six equal-weighted sub-rates5.58%
Figure 1

Monthly electricity consumption (S0 baseline) vs. PV production under S1 (12 kWp) and S2 (18 kWp). Arrows indicate net surplus (upward) and deficit (downward) periods for S1.

Figure 2

Global Warming Potential per cycle for washing and drying operations across all four scenarios. Percentage reductions relative to S0 baseline indicated above bars.

Table 3

Full ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint LCA results per washing cycle across all scenarios.

IMPACT CATEGORY (UNIT)S0S1 (PV)S3 (HP ONLY)S2 (PV+HP)S0→S2 CHANGE (%)
Global warming (kg CO2 eq)0.81570.72000.39950.2730–66.5%
Stratospheric ozone depletion (kg CFC11 eq × 10–7)4.5484.0824.6993.628–20.2%
Ionising radiation (kBq Co-60 eq × 10–2)3.0851.92311.7901.728–44.0%
Ozone formation – health (kg NOx eq × 10–4)9.4338.0726.8585.690–39.7%
Fine particulate matter (kg PM2.5 eq × 10–4)4.7043.9964.7014.035–14.2%
Terrestrial acidification (kg SO2 eq × 10–3)1.2080.9841.2360.984–18.5%
Freshwater eutrophication (kg P eq × 10–4)6.1296.0166.2166.146–0.7%
Marine eutrophication (kg N eq × 10–4)6.7186.7106.6736.665–0.8%
Terrestrial ecotoxicity (kg 1,4-DCB)7.4087.1886.4926.374–14.0%
Freshwater ecotoxicity (kg 1,4-DCB × 10–2)4.5424.1766.9975.571+22.6% ↑
Marine ecotoxicity (kg 1,4-DCB × 10–2)6.3385.8659.1637.420+17.1% ↑
Human carcinogenic toxicity (kg 1,4-DCB × 10–1)1.2931.2401.0510.976–24.5%
Human non-carcinogenic toxicity (kg 1,4-DCB × 10–1)7.6017.1079.9028.400+10.5% ↑
Land use (m2 a crop eq × 10–2)4.7964.4455.4984.372–8.8%
Mineral resource scarcity (kg Cu eq × 10–3)2.2192.0812.7172.200–0.9%
Fossil resource scarcity (kg oil eq × 10–1)2.8482.5241.1110.820–71.2%
Water consumption (m3 × 10–3)8.5577.21315.3228.284–3.2%
Ozone formation – ecosystems (kg NOx eq × 10–3)1.0520.9040.7440.617–41.4%
Figure 3

Stacked GWP contribution breakdown per washing cycle by emission source: S0 (baseline), S1 (PV only), and S2 (PV+HP). Values in kg CO2 eq per cycle.

Figure 4

Normalised ReCiPe 2016 radar plot for eight impact categories (washing cycle). S0 = 1.0 reference. Values above 1.0 indicate higher impact than baseline; values below 1.0 indicate environmental improvement.

Figure 5

S0 baseline impact source breakdown per emission category – drying cycle (18 ReCiPe 2016 midpoint categories).

Table 4

LCA results per drying cycle: baseline and PV scenarios with natural gas contribution analysis.

IMPACT CATEGORYS0 BASES1 (+PV)S3 (+HP)S2 (+PV+HP)S0→S1 CHANGES0→S3 CHANGES0→S2 CHANGE
Global warming (kg CO2 eq)0.89800.83540.32800.0840–7.0%–63.5%–90.6%
Fossil resource scarcity (kg oil eq)0.32690.30560.12750.0820–6.5%–61%–74.9%
Fine particulate matter (kg PM2.5 eq × 10–4)2.2981.8352.29651.9712–20.2%–0.1%–14.2%
Terrestrial acidification (kg SO2 eq × 10–4)5.7844.3185.91814.7115–25.3%+2.3%–18.5%
Terrestrial ecotoxicity (kg 1,4-DCB)3.8883.7443.40723.3453–3.7%–12.4%–14%
Water consumption (m3 × 10–3)2.1191.2403.79422.0514–41.5%+79.1%–3.2%
Human carcinogenic toxicity (kg 1,4-DCB × 10–1)7.1876.8425.84195.4250–4.8%–18.7%–24.5%
Ionising radiation (kBq Co-60 eq × 10–2)1.6690.9096.37840.9349–45.5%+282.2%–44%
Figure 6

Normalised ReCiPe 2016 radar plot for eight impact categories (drying cycle). S0 = 1.0 reference. Values above 1.0 indicate higher impact than baseline; values below 1.0 indicate environmental improvement.

Table 5

Per-cycle GWP, annual cycle counts, and annual fleet-wide GWP reductions by scenario and operation type (S0 = baseline).

OPERATION/SCENARIOANNUAL CYCLESGWP PER CYCLE (kg CO2 eq)Δ VS S0 (kg CO2/CYCLE)ANNUAL GWP REDUCTION (kg CO2)
Washing — S011,5960.816
Washing — S1 (+PV)11,5960.720.0961,113
Washing — S2 (+PV+HP)11,5960.2730.5436,297
Washing — S3 (+HP)11,5960.39950.4164,824
Drying — S024,1760.898
Drying — S1 (+PV)24,1760.8350.0631,523
Drying — S2 (+PV+HP)24,1760.0840.81419,679
Drying — S3 (+HP)24,1760.3280.57013,780
TOTAL fleet — S135,7722,636
TOTAL fleet — S235,77225,976
TOTAL fleet — S335,77218,604
Figure 7

Cumulative discounted net present value (r = 5%) over 30 years for three investment scenarios.

Table 6

Summary of economic performance indicators (r = 5%, 30-year horizon).

INDICATORS1: PV (12 kWp)S2: PV+HP (18 kWp + 6 kW HP)S3: HP ONLYUNIT
Total investment14,50033,50013,500
Annual savings4,9867,516166€/year
Simple PB2.914.46years
Discounted PB3.225.16years
NPV (30 years)52,75275,547–11,775
NPV at r = 3%~72,100~104,500~ –9,900
NPV at r = 8%~37,800~55,200~ –13,400
Profitability Index3.642.26–0.87
Est. IRR~34%~22%<0%%
Figure 8

Tornado chart: NPV sensitivity for Scenario 2 (PV+HP) to key uncertain parameters.

Figure 9

Discounted LCA: cumulative discounted GWP for washing operations over 25 years (r = 5%). Shaded area represents cumulative GWP saving of S2 relative to baseline.

Symbol/Abbrev.Definition
COPCoefficient of Performance (dimensionless)
CSRDCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (EU 2022/2464)
DLCADiscounted Life Cycle Assessment
DPBDiscounted Payback Period (years)
FRSFossil Resource Scarcity (kg oil eq)
GWPGlobal Warming Potential (kg CO2 eq)
HORECAHotels, Restaurants, and Catering
HPHeat Pump
IRRInternal Rate of Return (%)
LCALife Cycle Assessment
LHVLower Heating Value (kWh/Sm3)
NPVNet Present Value (€)
PBSimple Payback Period (years)
PESTELPolitical, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal (analytical framework)
PIProfitability Index (dimensionless) = (NPV + Investment)/Investment
PVPhotovoltaic (solar electricity generation system)
rSocial Discount Rate (%)
SDRSocial Discount Rate
SCOPSeasonal Coefficient of Performance
SMESmall and Medium-Sized Enterprise
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Submitted on: May 8, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2026
Published on: Jul 29, 2026
Published by: European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Beatrice Marchi, Enrico Bertagna, Lucio E. Zavanella, Simone Zanoni, published by European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 1 (2026): Issue 2