Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Who Suffered and Who Benefited? Students’ Perceptions on Digitalization of Studies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Finnish Higher Education Cover

Who Suffered and Who Benefited? Students’ Perceptions on Digitalization of Studies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Finnish Higher Education

Open Access
|Feb 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Health and functional impairments reported by students and estimated population size in EUROSTUDENT surveys in Finland in 2019 and 2022.

Table 1

Descriptive sample statistics (n = 6,839).

VARIABLE%
Type of HEI
University47.6
University of Applied Sciences52.4
Age
under 2112.3
22–2526.9
26–2926.9
30–3919.6
over 4014.4
Enrolled at HEI
before COVID-19 outbreak55.9
after COVID-19 outbreak43.9
Field of education (ISCED-10)
Education5.5
Humanities and arts14.4
Social sciences, journalism, and information6.1
Business, administration, and law13.5
Natural sciences, mathematics, and statistics4.5
Information and Communication Technologies8.3
Engineering, manufacturing, and construction14.5
Agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and veterinary10.1
Health and welfare17.3
Services5.9
Health and functional impairment
Yes46.6
No53.4
Type of health and functional impairment
Physical chronic disease13.3
Mental health problem23.1
Mobility impairment1.7
Sensory impairment (vision or hearing)2.0
Learning disability (ADHD, dyslexia)7.6
Another longstanding health problem/functional limitation/impairment/etc.12.7
Parent of a child younger than 18 years old
Yes18.4
No81.6
Table 2

Groups of explanatory background variables.

GROUP NAMEVARIABLES
Digitalization of teaching, learning, and student lifeImportance of computers, digital devices, and tools in studies
Importance of computers, digital devices, and tools in everyday life
Sufficiency of professional digital skills in studies
Desire for in-person or online teaching and learning
Satisfaction with the digital availability of administrative services
Satisfaction with the digital availability of counselling services
Satisfaction with the digital availability of online exams
Satisfaction with the digital availability of recorded courses/lectures
Satisfaction with the digital availability of required study materials
Weekly personal study time (e.g., preparation, studying, and homework)
Weekly time on taught studies (lessons, seminars, labs, tests, live online courses of study program, etc.)
External factorsBalancing studies with other responsibilities
Financing living expenses
Employment/paid work situation
Financing studies
Demographic factorsAge
Field of study
Type of HEI
Enrolled as a student in higher education before/after pandemic
Health and functional impairment
Child under 18 years of age
Table 3

Research questions and methods used.

RESEARCH QUESTIONVARIABLESMETHODRESULTS
RQ1: How students perceived the digitalization of studies during the pandemic?Study variables
  • Study duration

  • Academic achievement

  • Teaching quality

  • Study motivation

  • Contacts with other students

Hierarchical cluster analysisClusters A, B, and C
RQ2: What characterizes the positive and negative perceptions on digitalization of studies?
RQ3: How perceptions of students with health and functional impairments differ from other students?
Background variables, i.e., selected variables of following groups:
  • Digitalization of teaching, learning, and student life

  • External factors

  • Demographic factors

Binary logistic regression (method: enter)Significant predictors for clusters A and C
Significant predictors of the background variablesBinary logistic regression
(method: forward stepwise)
Final results for clusters A and C
Figure 2

Dendrogram of the clusters.

Table 4

Variables associated with profile memberships.

POSITIVE EFFECT ON STUDIES (A)GENERAL (CLOSE TO AVERAGE) EFFECT ON STUDIES (B)NEGATIVE EFFECT ON STUDIES (C)TOTAL
Study duration*4.632.12.9
Academic achievement*4.83.222.9
Study motivation*4.62.71.62.5
Teaching quality*3.82.61.72.4
Contacts with fellow students*2.821.41.8
n4484,2592,1326,839
% of n6.6%62.3%31.2%100.0%
Population estimate19,000180,00090,000289,000
% of total population6.6%62.3%31.1%100.0%

[i] *Average population means of the profiles.

Figure 3

Profile differences in students’ perceptions on effects of the COVID-10 pandemic on study duration, academic achievement, study motivation, quality of teaching, and contacts with other students.

Table 5

Results of forward stepwise binary logistic regression of the profile Positive effect on studies.

FACTOR
STEP 12
R2 (NAGELKERKE) = 0.214 (N = 4,250)
REGRESSION COEFFICIENT BSEODDS RATIO (OR)1/OR
Desire for online teaching and learning–1.42***0.140.244.15
Balancing studies with other responsibilities1.65***0.195.190.19
Satisfaction with digital availability of counselling services0.50***0.121.640.61
Experiencing professional digital skills sufficient compared to what is required in studies–0.78***0.130.462.18
Using 0–10 hours per week on personal study timea–0.89***0.140.412.44
Using 11–20 hours per week on personal study timea–0.72***0.130.492.05
Financing living expanses0.70***0.182.010.50
Satisfaction with digital availability of required study materials0.49***0.131.640.61
Satisfaction with digital availability of recorded courses/lectures–0.29*0.120.751.34
Age under 21 years–0.63**0.230.531.88
Studying education–0.70*0.280.502.02
Studying in a university–0.23*0.120.801.26

[i] aPreparation, studying, and homework.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

All variables used in the analysis were dichotomous. The variables are presented in descending order of importance, based on the sequence in which the variables were included in the forward stepwise binary logistic regression.

Table 6

Results of forward stepwise binary logistic regression of the profile Negative effect on studies.

FACTOR
STEP 17
R2 (NAGELKERKE) = 0.314 (N = 6,114)
REGRESSION COEFFICIENT BSEODDS RATIO (OR)1/OR
Balancing studies with other responsibilities–1.22***0.070.303.38
Desire for in-person teaching and learning1.00***0.072.720.37
Financing ones’ studies–0.52***0.080.591.68
Satisfaction with digital availability of administrative services0.38***0.071.470.68
Satisfaction with digital availability of recorded courses/lectures0.24**0.071.270.78
Studying in a UAS0.56***0.071.750.57
Enrolled as a student in higher education in the lecture period 2019/20 (i.e., last period before pandemic)–0.42***0.070.661.52
Age over 40 years–0.71***0.110.492.04
Mental health problem0.28***0.071.320.76
Learning disability (e.g., dyslexia)0.46***0.111.580.00
Studying business, administration, or law–0.32***0.090.731.38
Finding computers, digital devices, and tools important in studies–0.58**0.170.561.79
Satisfaction with digital availability of online exams0.25***0.071.280.78
Satisfaction with digital availability of counselling services0.23**0.071.250.80
Age 30–39 years–0.28**0.090.751.33
Experiencing professional digital skills sufficient compared to what is required in studies–0.22**0.080.801.25
Financing living expenses–0.19*0.080.831.21

[i] *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

All variables used in the analysis were dichotomous. The variables are presented in descending order of importance, based on the sequence in which the variables were included in the forward stepwise binary logistic regression.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65043/eurodl.157 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 2
Submitted on: Jun 7, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 13, 2026
Published on: Feb 9, 2026
Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Merja Laamanen, Tarja Ladonlahti, Päivi Häkkinen, Kari Nissinen, Tommi Kärkkäinen, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.