Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does Literariness Influence Negative Empathy? A Study on the Effects of Foregrounding on Readers’ Affective and Aesthetic Reactions Cover

Does Literariness Influence Negative Empathy? A Study on the Effects of Foregrounding on Readers’ Affective and Aesthetic Reactions

By:   
Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Albiero, P., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, A. (2006). Contributo all’adattamento italiano dell’Interpersonal Reactivity Index. TPM, 13(2), 107125.
  2. Andreychik, M. R., & Lewis, E. (2017). Will you help me to suffer less? How about to feel more joy? Positive and negative empathy are associated with different other-oriented motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 139149. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.038
  3. Andreychik, M. R., & Migliaccio, N. (2015). Empathizing with others’ pain versus empathizing with others’ joy: Examining the separability of positive and negative empathy and their relation to different types of social behaviors and social emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(5), 274291. 10.1080/01973533.2015.1071256
  4. Andringa, E. (1996). Effects of “narrative distance” on readers’ emotional involvement and response. Poetics, 23, 431452. 10.1016/0304-422X(95)00009-9
  5. Bálint, K., Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M., Doicaru, M., & Tan, E. S. (2016). Reconceptualizing foregrounding. Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2), 176207. 10.1075/ssol.6.2.02bal
  6. Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 315). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002
  7. Batson, C. D. (2014). Empathy-induced altruism and morality: No necessary connection. In H. L. Maibom (Ed.), Empathy and Morality (pp. 4158). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199969470.003.0002
  8. Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2014). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 259281). Oxford University Press.
  9. Bonasera, C. (2023). Exploring the potential of sentiment analysis for the study of negative empathy. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52(2), 163189. 10.1515/jls-2023-2011
  10. Bonasera, C. (2024). Negative Empathy in Fiction. Mimesis, Contagion, Catharsis. In N. Lawtoo & M. García-Granero (Eds.), Homo Mimeticus II: Re-Turns to Mimesis (pp. 247262). Leuven University Press. 10.2307/jj.16040333.15
  11. Bourget, J. (2023). From witness to accomplice: the manipulation of readers’ empathy through consciousness representation in Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr Ripley. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52(2), 145161. 10.1515/jls-2023-2010
  12. Burke, M., Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., & Schilhab, T. (2016). Empathy at the confluence of neuroscience and empirical literary studies. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 641. 10.1075/ssol.6.1.03bur
  13. Coplan, A. (2004). Empathetic engagement with narrative fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62(2), 141152. 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00147.x
  14. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
  15. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113126. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  16. de Jonge, J., Demichelis, S., Rebora, S., & Salgaro, M. (2022). Operationalizing perpetrator studies. Focusing readers’ reactions to The Kindly Ones by Jonathan Littell. Journal of Literary Semantics, 51(2), 147161. 10.1515/jls-2022-2057
  17. De Wied, M., Zillmann, D., & Ordman, V. (1995). The role of empathic distress in the enjoyment of cinematic tragedy. Poetics, 23, 91106. 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00010-4
  18. Decety, J., & Ickes, W. (Eds.). (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.001.0001
  19. Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 7183). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0007
  20. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91119. 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
  21. Ercolino, S. (2018). Negative empathy: History, theory, criticism. Orbis Litterarum, 73(3), 243262. 10.1111/oli.12175
  22. Ercolino, S., & Fusillo, M. (2022). Empatia negativa. Il punto di vista del male. Bompiani.
  23. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2020). Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature, 29(2), 124146. 10.1177/0963947020927134
  24. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C., & Stradling, F. (2023). Introduction: stylistic approaches to narrative empathy. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52(2), 103121. 10.1515/jls-2023-2008
  25. Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105123. 10.1177/0963947007075979
  26. Fialho, O. (2019). What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), 1692532. 10.1080/23311983.2019.1692532
  27. Hakemulder, F. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social and moral self-concept. John Benjamins. 10.1075/upal.34
  28. Hakemulder, F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193218. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3
  29. Hakemulder, F. (2020). Finding meaning through literature: Foregrounding as an emergent effect. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 31(1), 91110. 10.33675/ANGL/2020/1/8
  30. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  31. Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
  32. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377380. 10.1126/science.1239918
  33. Koopman, E. (2016). Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 8298. 10.1037/aca0000041
  34. Koopman, E. (2017). Does originality evoke understanding? The relation between literary reading and empathy. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 169177. 10.1037/gpr0000107
  35. Koopman, E., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79111. 10.1515/jlt-2015-0005
  36. Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C. (2017). Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137152. 10.1177/0963947017704729
  37. Littell, J. (2010). The Kindly Ones (C. Mandell, Trans.). London: Vintage.
  38. Maibom, H. L. (2020). Empathy. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213477
  39. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694712. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
  40. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications: European Journal of Communication, 34(4), 407428. 10.1515/COMM.2009.025
  41. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389407. 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
  42. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 121138. 10.1080/01638539909545076
  43. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30(4), 221241. 10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00011-6
  44. Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). The emerging study of positive empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(2), 5768. 10.1111/spc3.12157
  45. Mukarovsky, J. (1976). On poetic language (J. Burbank & P. Steiner, Trans.). John Benjamins.
  46. Nabokov, V. (1991). Lolita. Vintage.
  47. Salgaro, M., Wagner, V., & Menninghaus, W. (2021). A good, a bad, and an evil character: Who renders a novel most enjoyable? Poetics, 87, 101550. 10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101550
  48. Scapin, G., Loi, C., Hakemulder, F., Bálint, K., & Konijn, E. (2023). The role of processing foregrounding in empathic reactions in literary reading. Discourse Processes, 60(4–5), 273293. 10.1080/0163853X.2023.2198813
  49. Shen, L. (2010). On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication 74(5), 504524. 10.1080/10570314.2010.512278
  50. Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis, Trans. & Eds.), (pp. 324). University of Nebraska Press.
  51. Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. A resource book for students. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203496589
  52. Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Croom Helm.
  53. Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16, 197213. 10.1177/0963947007075985
  54. Van Peer, W., Sopčák, P., Castiglione, D., Fialho, O., Jacobs, A. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2021). Foregrounding. In D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies (pp. 145176). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110645958-007
  55. Wimmer, L., Friend, S., Currie, G., & Ferguson, H. J. (2021). Reading fictional narratives to improve social and moral cognition: The influence of narrative perspective, transportation, and identification. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 611935. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.611935
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.198 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 106
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 16, 2025
Published on: Nov 18, 2025
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Carmen Bonasera, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.