Does Watching Fictional TV Series Increase Social-Cognitive Skills?
By: Jan Lenhart and Tobias Richter
References
- Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015). The transportation scale–short form (TS–SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2014.987400
- Appel, M., Hanauer, D., Hoeken, H., van Krieken, K., Richter, T., & Sanders, J. (2021).
The psychological and social effects of literariness: Formal features and paratextual information . In D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 177–202). De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110645958-008 - Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13(2), 101–135. DOI: 10.1080/15213261003799847
- Bakhtin, M. (2013). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. University of Minnesota Press.
- Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS One, 8(1),
e55341 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 - Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall
- Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251. DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Black, J., & Barnes, J. L. (2015). Fiction and social cognition: The effect of viewing award-winning television dramas on theory of mind. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 423–429. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000031
- Black, J. E. (2019). An IRT analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 425–433. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1447946
- Black, J. E., Barnes, J. L., Oatley, K., Tamir, D. I., Dodell-Feder, D., Richter, T., & Mar, R. A. (2021).
Stories and their role in social cognition . In D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 241–260). De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110645958-010 - Bölte, S. (2005). Reading mind in the eyes test: Erwachsenenversion [Reading the mind in the eyes test: Adult version].
https://docs.autismresearchcentre.com/tests/EyesTest_German.pdf . - Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674029019
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cohen, J. (2006).
Audience identification with media characters . In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 183–198). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. - Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
- Delacre, M., & Klein, O. (2019). Routliers: Robust outliers detection. R package version 0.0.0.3. DOI: 10.32614/CRAN.package.Routliers
- Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000395
- Dziobek, I., Fleck, S., Kalbe, E., Rogers, K., Hassenstab, J., Brand, M., … & Convit, A. (2006). Introducing MASC: A movie for the assessment of social cognition. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 623–636. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-006-0107-0
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701
- Grolig, L., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Print exposure across the reading life span. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(6), 1423–1441. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-019-10014-3
- Hakemulder, J. F. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: 10.1075/upal.34
- Happ, C., & Pfetsch, J. (2015). Medienbasierte Empathie (MBE) – Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Erfassung empathischer Reaktionen bei Mediennutzung [Media-Based Empathy (MBE) – Development of an instrument to assess empathic reactions when using media]. Diagnostica, 62(2), 110–125. DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000152
- Happ, C., & Pfetsch, J. (2018). Medienbasierte Empathie (MBE) [Media-Based Empathy (MBE)]. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). DOI: 10.6102/zis256
- Hogan, P. C. (2003). The mind and its stories. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499951
- Isberner, M. B., Richter, T., Schreiner, C., Eisenbach, Y., Sommer, C., & Appel, M. (2019). Empowering stories: Transportation into narratives with strong protagonists increases self-related control beliefs. Discourse Processes, 56(8), 575–598. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1526032
- Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005
- Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S. (2013). Potentiating empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 306–312. DOI: 10.1037/a0033261
- Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380. DOI: 10.1126/science.1239918
- Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2019). Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychology and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. DOI: 10.1177/1948550618775410
- Koopman, E., & Hakemulder, J. F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. DOI: 10.1515/jlt-2015-0005
- Kuznetsova A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. DOI: 10.1177/2515245918770963
- Lenhart, J., & Richter, T. (2022). Does reading a single short story of literary fiction improve social-cognitive skills? Testing the priming hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000533
- Lenhart, J., Richter, T., Appel, M., & Mar, R. A. (2023). Adolescent leisure reading and its longitudinal association with prosocial behavior and social adjustment. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 9695. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35346-7
- Lenth, R. V. (2023). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.8.6.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans . - Leys, C., Delacre, M., Mora, Y. L., Lakens, D., & Ley, C. (2019). How to classify, detect, and manage univariate and multivariate outliers, with emphasis on pre-registration. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), Article 5. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.289
- Lüdecke, D. (2023). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 2.8.14.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot . - Mar, R. A. (2018a). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
- Mar, R. A. (2018b). Stories and the promotion of social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 257–262. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417749654
- Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
- Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
- Mar, R. A., Tackett, J. L., & Moore, C. (2010). Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 69–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002
- Meyer, J., & Shean, G. (2006). Social-cognitive functioning and schizotypal characteristics. The Journal of Psychology, 140(3), 199–207. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.140.3.199-207
- Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. DOI: 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
- Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000089
- Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2019). How does leisure reading affect social cognitive abilities? Poetics Today, 40(3), 453–473. DOI: 10.1215/03335372-7558080
- Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101–117. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101
- Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000064
- Paulus, C. (2012). Ist die Bildung eines Empathiescores in der deutschen Fassung des IRI sinnvoll? [Is it reasonable to form a general empathy score in the German version of the IRI?]. DOI: 10.22028/D291-23347
- Paulus, C. (2019). Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen (IRI-S D). Based on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). V 7.0. Universität des Saarlandes.
- Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M. (2016). The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PLoS One, 11(8), Article
e0160254 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254 - Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
- R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from
https://www.R-project.org/ . - Richter, T., Appel, M., & Calio, F. (2014). Stories can influence the self-concept. Social Influence, 9, 172–188. DOI: 10.1080/15534510.2013.799099
- Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L. (2018). Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 130–144. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591
- Scapin, G., Loi, C., Hakemulder, F., Bálint, K., & Konijn, E. (2023). The role of processing foregrounding in empathic reactions in literary reading. Discourse Processes, 60(4–5), 273–293. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2023.2198813
- Schwerin, J., & Lenhart, J. (2022). The effects of literariness on social-cognitive skills: Examining narrative engagement, transportation, and identification as moderators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000514
- Sestir, M., & Green, M. C. (2010). You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept. Social Influence, 5(4), 272–288. DOI: 10.1080/15534510.2010.490672
- Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614567341
- van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. (2018). The effect of reading a short passage of literary fiction on Theory of Mind: A replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), Article 7. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.117
- van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. DOI: 10.1086/673383
- Westfall, J. (2016). PANGEA: Power analysis for general ANOVA designs. Working paper: Manuscript last updated October 11, 2016.
http://jakewestfall.org/publications/pangea.pdf .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.184 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 49
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 6, 2024
Published on: Sep 26, 2024
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Jan Lenhart, Tobias Richter, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.