Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does Watching Fictional TV Series Increase Social-Cognitive Skills? Cover

Does Watching Fictional TV Series Increase Social-Cognitive Skills?

By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive Statistics in Study 1.

VARIABLESFINAL SAMPLE (N = 201)TV SERIES (n = 73)DOCUMENTARY (n = 128)
MSDMSDMSD
Gender (female)157 (78%)52 (71%)105 (82%)
Education
Low track0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Middle track2 (1%)0 (0%)2 (2%)
High track170 (85%)64 (88%)106 (83%)
University degree24 (12%)9 (12%)15 (12%)
Other5 (2%)0 (0%)5 (4%)
Age (years)22.495.2521.933.4422.806.04
ART13.277.6113.377.4513.227.73
Identification2.790.933.070.872.630.94
Transportation3.100.863.120.823.090.88
Theory of Mind (t1)25.762.8925.732.7925.782.96
Theory of Mind (t2)26.143.1726.452.9025.963.31
Empathy (t1)3.750.423.720.433.770.42
Empathy (t2)3.710.453.650.463.750.44
Other TV series/films (number)1.161.101.331.141.061.07
Other TV series/films (hours)3.734.484.555.043.264.07
Time pre- to posttest (hours)171.709.02171.408.90171.809.12

[i] Note. The educational system in Germany comprises three high-school tracks in secondary school: Haupt-/Mittelschule (low track), Realschule (middle track), Gymnasium (high track), with only the latter track qualifying for university entrance. ART = Author Recognition Test (Grolig et al., 2020; checklist B). Other TV series/films refer to other TV series and films watched during the period of the study.

Table 2

Effects of Experimental Condition on Theory of Mind and Empathy in Study 1.

PREDICTORSToM MODEL 1ToM MODEL 2ToM MODEL 3EMP MODEL 1EMP MODEL 2EMP MODEL 3
ESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)p
(Intercept)25.98
(25.60–26.36)
133.39
(199)
  <.001  26.01
  (25.61–26.41)
  128.16
  (197)
<.001  25.98
  (25.60–26.37)
  133.10
  (197)
<.001  3.72
  (3.66–3.78)
  120.87
  (199)
<.001  3.69
  (3.63–3.75)
  127.80
  (197)
<.001  3.72
  (3.66–3.78)
  127.49
  (197)
<.001
Condition0.11
(–0.28–0.49)
0.56
(199)
  .576  0.14
  (–0.26–0.54)
  0.70
  (197)
.486  0.11
  (–0.27–0.50)
  0.57
  (197)
.567–0.04
  (–0.10–0.02)
–1.29
  (199)
.199–0.09
  (–0.15––0.03)
–3.16
  (197)
.002–0.04
  (–0.10–0.02)
–1.45
  (197)
.148
Time0.23
(0.01–0.44)
2.10
(199)
  .037  0.20
  (–0.03–0.42)
  1.74
  (197)
.083  0.22
  (0.01–0.44)
  2.07
  (197)
.039–0.02
  (–0.04––0.01)
–2.80
  (199)
.006–0.03
  (–0.04––0.01)
–2.80
  (197)
.006–0.02
  (–0.04––0.01)
–2.79
  (197)
.006
Condition × Time0.14
(–0.08–0.35)
1.27
(199)
  .207  0.11
  (–0.11–0.33)
  0.97
  (197)
.331  0.13
  (–0.08–0.35)
  1.25
  (197)
.214–0.01
  (–0.03–0.01)
–1.34
  (199)
.182–0.01
  (–0.03–0.01)
–1.33
  (197)
.184–0.01
  (–0.03–0.01)
–1.35
  (197)
.178
Identification–0.12
  (–0.56–0.31)
–0.56
  (197)
.577  0.21
  (0.15–0.28)
  6.82
  (197)
<.001
Condition × Identification–0.10
  (–0.53–0.34)
–0.44
  (197)
.659  0.08
  (0.02–0.15)
  2.65
  (197)
.009
Time × Identification  0.09
  (–0.15–0.33)
  0.76
  (197)
  .446  0.00
  (–0.02–0.02)
  0.08
  (197)
.938
Condition × Time × Identification  0.12
  (–0.12–0.36)
  0.96
  (197)
.340  0.00
  (–0.01–0.02)
  0.47
  (197)
.640
Transportation–0.22
  (–0.68–0.24)
–0.93
  (197)
.355  0.17
  (0.10–0.24)
  4.91
  (197)
<.001
Condition × Transportation  0.05
  (–0.41–0.52)
  0.23
  (197)
.816  0.03
  (–0.03–0.10)
  0.99
  (197)
.325
Time × Transportation  0.08
  (–0.17–0.34)
  0.65
  (197)
.515  0.01
  (–0.01–0.03)
  0.90
  (197)
.368
Condition × Time × Transportation  0.10
  (–0.15–0.36)
  0.80
  (197)
.427–0.00
  (–0.02–0.02)
–0.34
  (197)
.737
Random Effects
Residual Variance  4.33  4.35  4.36  0.03  0.03  0.03
Intercept Variance  4.89 id  4.94 id  4.90 id  0.16 id  0.13 id  0.14 id
ICC  .53  .53  .53  .85  .82  .84
N  201 id  201 id  201 id  201 id  201 id  201 id
Observations  402  402  402  402  402  402
Marginal R2/Conditional R2  .007/.534  .010/.536  .012/.535  .011/.854  .183/.854  .111/.855

[i] Note. CI = 95% confidence interval. Categorical variables were effect-coded (Time: pretest = –1, posttest = 1; Condition: documentary = –1, TV series = 1). Continuous predictors were mean-centered.

Figure 1

Effect of Experimental Condition on Theory of Mind in Study 1.

Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 2

Effect of Experimental Condition on Empathy in Study 1.

Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Table 3

Descriptive Statistics in Study 2.

VARIABLESFINAL SAMPLE (N = 165)TV SERIES (n = 84)DOCUMENTARY (n = 81)
MSDMSDMSD
Gender (female)142 (86%)73 (87%)69 (85%)
Education
High track158 (96%)79 (94%)79 (98%)
Other Tracks7 (4%)5 (6%)2 (2%)
Age (years)21.996.2122.006.2921.986.17
ART12.826.9312.967.2612.686.62
Transportation4.951.075.500.764.381.04
Theory of Mind (t1)24.473.0224.352.9824.603.08
Theory of Mind (t2)24.813.3024.373.3625.263.19
Theory of Mind (t3)25.143.7724.884.0325.413.50
Empathy (t1)3.720.423.690.423.750.42
Empathy (t2)3.780.403.760.413.790.40
Empathy (t3)3.760.423.750.443.770.41
Media-based empathy (t1)3.920.453.870.463.970.45
Media-based empathy (t2)3.910.443.920.473.900.40
Media-based empathy (t3)3.860.463.830.483.880.45
Other TV genres (number)2.601.252.621.182.581.32
Other TV episodes (number)2.871.862.951.942.781.78
Time pre- to posttest (hours)98.7556.4687.9454.38110.0056.71
Time posttest to follow-up (hours)169.2026.24165.3027.95173.2023.85

[i] Note. The educational system in Germany comprises three high-school tracks in secondary school: Haupt-/Mittelschule (low track), Realschule (middle track), Gymnasium (high track), with only the latter track qualifying for university entrance. ART = Author Recognition Test (Grolig et al., 2020; checklist B). Other TV genres/episodes refer to other TV genres and episodes watched during the period from pre- to posttest.

Table 4

Effects of Experimental Condition on Theory of Mind, Empathy, and Media-Based Empathy in Study 2, Controlling for Time between Pretest and Posttest.

PREDICTORSToM MODEL 1ToM MODEL 2EMP MODEL 1EMP MODEL 2MEDIA EMP MODEL 1MEDIA EMP MODEL 2
ESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)p
(Intercept)  24.80
  (24.36–25.25)
  111.09
  (161)
<.001  24.76
  (24.25–25.28)
  95.22
  (157)
<.001  3.75
  (3.69–3.82)
  120.04
  (161)
<.001  3.68
  (3.61–3.75)
  104.06
  (157)
<.001  3.90
  (3.83–3.96)
  112.66
  (161)
<.001  3.80
  (3.72–3.88)
  96.50
  (157)
<.001
Condition–0.26
  (–0.70–0.18)
–1.15
  (161)
  .251–0.72
  (–1.24––0.21)
–2.78
  (157)
.006–0.02
  (–0.08–0.05)
–0.52
  (161)
  .605–0.10
  (–0.17––0.03)
–2.84
  (157)
.005–0.02
  (–0.08–0.05)
–0.44
  (161)
  .664–0.09
  (–0.17––0.01)
–2.30
  (157)
.022
Time2  0.00
  (–0.29–0.29)
  0.02
  (324)
.984–0.02
  (–0.37–0.34)
–0.09
  (316)
  .932  0.02
  (0.00–0.04)
  2.06
  (324)
.040  0.02
  (–0.01–0.04)
  1.32
  (316)
  .189  0.01
  (–0.01–0.03)
  1.13
  (324)
  .260  0.01
  (–0.01–0.04)
  0.90
  (316)
  .371
Time3  0.33
  (0.04–0.62)
  2.25
  (324)
.025  0.29
  (–0.06–0.65)
  1.61
  (316)
  .108  0.01
  (–0.01–0.03)
  0.69
  (324)
  .490  0.00
  (–0.02–0.03)
  0.36
  (316)
  .717–0.04
  (–0.06––0.02)
–3.67
  (324)
<.001–0.05
  (–0.08––0.03)
–4.16
  (316)
<.001
Condition × Time 2–0.16
  (–0.46–0.14)
–1.05
  (324)
  .293–0.10
  (–0.45–0.26)
–0.55
  (316)
  .586–0.00
  (–0.02–0.02)
–0.10
  (324)
  .919–0.00
  (–0.03–0.02)
–0.13
  (316)
  .895  0.03
  (0.01–0.05)
  2.57
  (324)
.011  0.01
  (–0.01–0.04)
  1.18
  (316)
  .240
Condition × Time 3  0.04
  (–0.26–0.34)
  0.28
  (324)
  .782  0.04
  (–0.32–0.39)
  0.21
  (316)
  .833  0.00
  (–0.02–0.03)
  0.36
  (324)
  .719–0.00
  (–0.03–0.02)
–0.30
  (316)
  .764–0.00
  (–0.03–0.02)
–0.42
  (324)
  .676–0.01
  (–0.03–0.02)
–0.64
  (316)
  .520
Transportation  0.88
  (0.37–1.39)
  3.43
  (157)
.001  0.15
  (0.08–0.22)
  4.34
  (157)
<.001  0.13
  (0.06–0.21)
  3.42
  (157)
.001
Condition × Transportation  0.03
  (–0.48–0.53)
  0.10
  (157)
  .919  0.12
  (0.05–0.19)
  3.54
  (157)
.001  0.16
  (0.09–0.24)
  4.21
  (157)
<.001
Time 2 × Transportation–0.09
  (–0.43–0.25)
–0.54
  (316)
.591  0.00
  (–0.02–0.03)
  0.17
  (316)
.864  0.02
  (–0.00–0.05)
  1.97
  (316)
.050
Time 3 × Transportation  0.02
  (–0.32–0.36)
  0.11
  (316)
.909  0.02
  (–0.01–0.04)
  1.16
  (316)
.245  0.01
  (–0.02–0.03)
  0.46
  (316)
.646
Condition × Time 2 × Transportation  0.06
  (–0.29–0.41)
  0.32
  (316)
.752  0.01
  (–0.01–0.04)
  0.87
  (316)
.388–0.00
  (–0.03–0.02)
–0.08
  (316)
.938
Condition × Time 3 × Transportation  0.04
  (–0.31–0.39)
  0.20
  (316)
.842  0.00
  (–0.02–0.03)
  0.35
  (316)
.726  0.03
  (0.00–0.05)
  2.10
  (316)
.036
Random Effects
Residual Variance  5.40  5.46  0.03  0.03  0.03  0.03
Intercept Variance  6.08 id  5.47 id  0.14 id  0.12 id  0.18 id  0.16 id
ICC  .53  .50  .83  .80  .87  .86
N  165 id  165 id  165 id  165 id  165 id  165 id
Observations  495  495  495  495  495  495
Marginal R2/Conditional R2  .017/.537  .084/.542  .011/.828  .137/.830  .012/.874  .133/.878

[i] Note. CI = 95% confidence interval. Time span between pre- and posttest and all two-way and three-way interactions with the predictors (condition, time, and transportation) were included in the model but are not displayed to enhance readability of the table. Categorical variables were effect-coded (Time: pretest = –1, posttest = 1, follow-up = 1; Condition: documentary = –1, fictional TV series = 1). Continuous predictors (transportation, time between pre- and posttest) were mean-centered. A square-root transformation was applied to time between pre- and posttest because the data were positively skewed.

Figure 3

Effect of Experimental Condition on Theory of Mind in Study 2.

Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Time span between pre- and posttest and all two-way and three-way interactions with the predictors are included as covariates.

Figure 4

Effect of Experimental Condition on Empathy in Study 2.

Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Time span between pre- and posttest and all two-way and three-way interactions with the predictors are included as covariates.

Figure 5

Effect of Experimental Condition on Media-Based Empathy in Study 2.

Note: Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Time span between pre- and posttest and all two-way and three-way interactions with the predictors are included as covariates.

Table 5

Descriptive Statistics in Study 3.

VARIABLESFINAL SAMPLE (N = 46)TV SERIES (n = 23)DOCUMENTARY (n = 23)
MSDMSDMSD
Gender (female)36 (78%)18 (78%)18 (78%)
Education
High track40 (87%)21 (91%)19 (83%)
Other Tracks6 (13%)3 (9%)5 (17%)
Age (years)25.418.8023.788.1027.049.33
Theory of Mind RMET (t1)26.523.7826.833.1026.224.41
Theory of Mind RMET (t2)27.003.2026.573.2627.433.16
Theory of Mind MASC (t2)36.333.4335.833.5636.833.28
Empathy (t1)3.840.463.710.413.960.48
Empathy (t2)3.890.463.830.463.950.45
Enjoyment of Experimental Stimulus1.910.961.570.842.260.96

[i] Note. The educational system in Germany comprises three high-school tracks in secondary school: Haupt-/Mittelschule (low track), Realschule (middle track), Gymnasium (high track), with only the latter track qualifying for university entrance.

Table 6

Effects of Experimental Condition on Theory of Mind and Empathy in Study 3.

PREDICTORSToM MODEL 1 (RMET)ToM MODEL 2 (MASC)EMP MODEL 1
ESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)pESTIMATES (CI)t (df)p
(Intercept)  26.76
  (25.85–27.67)
  59.05
  (44)
<.001  36.33
  (35.31–37.34)
  71.90
  (44)
<.001  3.86
  (3.73–3.99)
  59.58
  (44)
<.001
Condition–0.07
  (–0.98–0.85)
–0.14
  (44)
.886–0.50
  (–1.52–0.52)
–0.99
  (44)
.328–0.09
  (–0.22–0.04)
–1.45
  (44)
.155
Time  0.24
  (–0.27–0.75)
  0.94
  (44)
.352  0.03
  (–0.01–0.06)
  1.62
  (44)
.112
Condition × Time–0.37
  (–0.88–0.14)
–1.45
  (44)
.153  0.03
  (–0.00–0.06)
  1.96
  (44)
.056
Random Effects
Residual Variance  5.94    0.02
Intercept Variance  6.48 id    0.18 id
ICC  .52    .89
N  46 id    46 id
Observations  92  46  92
Marginal R2/Conditional R2  .016/.529  .022/–.000  .049/.892

[i] Note. RMET = Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; MASC = Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition; CI = 95% confidence interval. Categorical variables were effect-coded (Time: pretest = –1, posttest = 1; Condition: documentary = –1, fictional TV series = 1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.184 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 49
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 6, 2024
Published on: Sep 26, 2024
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Jan Lenhart, Tobias Richter, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.