Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER Cover

An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER

By:  and    
Open Access
|Apr 2017

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Reasons given for lack of OER adoption in the Global North and South

VariablesGlobal North studiesGlobal South studies
Lack of OER awareness Reed, 2012; Rolfe, 2012 Hatakka, 2009; Samzugi & Mwinyimbegu, 2013
Lack of legal permission to create and share OER Fitzgerald & Hashim, 2012 Mtebe & Raisamo, 2014; Flor, 2013; Tynan & James, 2013
Lack of relevant, high-quality OER to use Clements & Pawlowski, 2012; Willems & Bossu, 2012 Abeywardena, Dhanarajan & Chan, 2012
Lack of personal interest or motivation McGill, Falconer, Dempster, Littlejohn & Beetham, 2013; Pegler, 2012; Reed, 2012; Rolfe, 2012 Cox, 2016; Gunness, 2012; He & Wei, 2009
Lack of time Allen & Seaman, 2014
Lack of institutional recognition for OER adoption Jhangiani, Pitt, Hendricks, Key & Lalonde, 2016
Infrastructural challenges, such as low levels of internet penetration, broadband availability, and electricity stability CERI/OECD, 2007; Ngimwa, 2010
Technical capacity Lesko, 2013; Wolfenden, Buckler & Keraro, 2012
Social and pedagogical norms Cox, 2012; Wolfenden, Buckler & Keraro, 2012
Figure 1

The OER adoption pyramid

Figure 2

Variables shaping volition in the OER Adoption Pyramid

Table 2

Variables associated with six OER adoption factors (from bottom to top)

OER Adoption FactorsAssociated variables for OER usersAssociated variables for OER creators
Volition
  • Teaching style

  • Education philosophy

  • Level of self-confidence in own teaching materials

  • Institutional incentives and recognition

  • Social context: departmental, disciplinary and collegial norms concerning using OER

  • Cost/convenience considerations

  • Temporal ramifications for use

  • Self-confidence in own teaching materials

  • Concern about others misusing or misinterpreting their work

  • Impact on public profile

  • Institutional commitment (policies, strategies)

  • Institutional support (technical, financial, administrative)

  • Institutional recognition (promotion, awards)

  • Social context: departmental, disciplinary and collegial norms concerning sharing one’s own materials as OER, including implicit and formal recognition

  • Temporal ramifications for creation

AvailabilityPerception of an OER’s:
  • quality (accuracy, completeness, rigour)

  • relevance (in terms of epistemic perspectives, scope, language, format, localisation, etc.)

  • utility (for a specific, anticipated teaching purpose)

Perception of one’s own teaching materials’:
  • quality

  • relevance

  • utility (for other educators)

  • Brand concerns: institutions may embark on a formal quality assurance process before sharing OER so as to ensure they bolster the profile of the university

Capacity
  • Legal knowledge concerning open licensing

  • Technical skills to search for, identify, download and use (reuse “as is”, revise, remix) OER

  • Legal knowledge concerning open licensing

  • Technical skills to openly license one’s work and upload (retain and distribute) it for public access

Awareness
  • Conceptual understanding of difference between OER and other (usually copyrighted) educational materials – as well as the difference between OER use and “fair use/dealing”

  • Conceptual understanding of difference between OER and other (usually copyrighted) educational materials

Permission
  • Parameters of the OER’s open license

  • IP policies (institutional)

  • Copyright policies (national/institutional)

Access
  • Internet access

  • Computer access

  • Electricity provision

  • Internet access

  • Computer access

  • Electricity provision

Table 3

Questions to ask OER users and creators – whether lecturers or institutions – to assess OER readiness at an institution (starting from the bottom factor)

FactorsQuestions for potential OER usersQuestions for potential OER creators
VolitionDo you have any desire to use OER?Do you have any desire to create and share your teaching materials as OER?
AvailabilityHave you found OER online – of acceptable relevance, utility and quality – that you can use?Do you hold copyright over teaching materials – of necessary relevance and quality – that you could license and share as OER?
CapacityDo you know how and where to search for and identify OER?
Do you know how the different CC licenses impact the ways in which you can use an OER?
Do you know how to license your teaching materials so that they can be shared as OER?
Do you know where (on which platforms) you can upload your materials as OER?
AwarenessDo you have any knowledge of or experience with OER?
Do you understand how Creative Commons (CC) licenses differentiate OER from traditionally copyrighted materials?
Do you have any knowledge of or experience with OER?
Do you understand how Creative Commons (CC) licenses differentiate OER from traditionally copyrighted materials?
PermissionDo you have permission (from your curriculum committee, etc.) to use OER for teaching?
Does the desired OER allow you use it in your specific context (e.g. no CC-ND licenses on items that will be sold as course material)?
Do you possess copyright over teaching materials that have been developed at your institution?
AccessDo you have (stable) electricity provision?
Do you have (stable) internet connectivity?
Do you have the necessary computer hardware for OER use?
Do you have (stable) electricity provision?
Do you have (stable) internet connectivity?
Do you have the necessary computer hardware for OER creation?
Table 4

Level of OER readiness per factor – if lecturers are the agents of OER creation

OER adoption factorUCTUFHUNISA
Volition
Availability
Capacity
Awareness
Permission
Access
Key: Level of OER readinessvery lowlowmediumhighvery high
Table 5

OER Readiness Tables – with comparison based on different agents of analysis

Factorlecturers as OER userslecturers as OER creatorsinstitution as OER creators
UCTUFHUNISAUCTUFHUNISAUCTUFHUNISA
Volition
Availability
Capacity
Awareness
Permission
Access
Key: Level of OER readinessvery lowlowmediumhighvery high
Figure 3

Relationship between volition variables and institutional culture type

Language: English
Page range: 151 - 171
Submitted on: Jan 24, 2017
Accepted on: Apr 14, 2017
Published on: Apr 1, 2017
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Glenda Cox, Henry Trotter, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.