Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“The best part was the contact!”: Understanding postgraduate students’ experiences of wrapped MOOCs Cover

“The best part was the contact!”: Understanding postgraduate students’ experiences of wrapped MOOCs

Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. Agarwal, A. (2014). Why massive open online courses (still) matter. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/anant_agarwal_why_massively_open_online_courses_still_matter
  2. Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 3744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
  3. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 322. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ837483
  4. Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 6583. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765
  5. Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820902809147
  6. Altbach, P. G. (2014). MOOCs as neocolonialism: who controls knowledge? International Higher Education. (75), 57. Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/5426/4854
  7. Bulger, M., Bright, J., & Cobo, C. (2015). The real component of virtual learning: motivations for face-to-face MOOC meetings in developing and industrialised countries. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 12001216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061571
  8. Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.htm
  9. Caulfield, M. (2013). Downes on the Wrapped MOOC. Retrieved from https://hapgood.us/2013/05/16/downes-on-the-wrapped-mooc/
  10. Chauhan, A. (2014). Massive open online courses (MOOCS): Emerging trends in assessment and accreditation. Digital Education Review, 25, 717. Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/11325
  11. Chen, Y. H. & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 5570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008
  12. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? University of Pennsylvania. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
  13. Collier, A., & Caulfield, M. (2013). Distributed Flip Confidential: MOOC Use in the Blended Classroom At the University of Puerto Rico Rao Piedras. 19th Annual Sloan Consortium International Conference of Online Learning. Florida: Sloan-C. 382.
  14. Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. RED - Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39, 117.
  15. Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Fife, M., Small, J., & Walji, S. (2015). CILT Position Paper: MOOCs. CILT, University of Cape Town. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14041
  16. Dellarocas, C. & Van Alstyne, M. (2013). Money models for MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 2528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2492007.2492017
  17. Downes, S. (2013). MOOC - the resurgence of community in online learning. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2013/05/mooc-resurgence-of-community-in-online.html
  18. Emanuel, E. J. (2013). Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature, 503(7476), 342342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/503342a
  19. Essa, I. (2011). Reflecting on some of the challenges facing postgraduate nursing education in South Africa. Nurse Education Today, 31(3), 253258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.007
  20. Ferrera, M., Ostrander, N., & Crabtree-Nelson, S. (2013). Establishing a community of inquiry through hybrid courses in clinical social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 438448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.835765
  21. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  22. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
  23. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2009). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  24. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  25. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  27. Green, W., Hammer, S., & Star, C. (2009). Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444339
  28. Griffiths, R. (2013). MOOCs in the classroom. Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/blog-individual/moocs-classroom
  29. Hanyane, B. R. (2015). Assessing the level of preparedness in research-based qualifications of postgraduate students in Public Administration and Management. Administratio Publica, 23(1), 733. Retrieved from http://journal.assadpam.net/index.php?journal=assadpam&page=issue&op=download&path%5B%5D=29&path%5B%5D=22#page=11
  30. Henderikx, P. (2016). From books to MOOCS: final reflections. Portland Press Limited (pp. 163173).
  31. Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 8391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019
  32. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using Asynchronous Audio Feedback to Enhance Teaching Presence and Students’ Sense of Community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 325.
  33. Janta, H., Lugosi, P., & Brown, L. (2014). Coping with loneliness: A netnographic study of doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 553571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.726972
  34. Jezegou, A. (2010). Community of Inquiry in E-learning: A critical analysis of the Garrison and Anderson Model. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 24(3). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewArticle/707/1141
  35. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
  36. Khalil, H., & Ebner, M., (2014, June). MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention-A literature review. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (13051313) Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Ebner2/publication/306127713_MOOCs_completion_rates_and_possible_methods_to_improve_retention-A_literature_review/links/57bb349c08aefea8f0f44ce9.pdf
  37. Krause, S. D. (2014). MOOC assigned. In D. S. Krause & C. Lowe (Eds.) Invasion of the MOOCs: the promises and perils of massive open online courses. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press. (122129.) Retrieved from http://www.parlorpress.com/pdf/invasion_of_the_moocs.pdf
  38. Le Grange, L., & Newmark, R. (2002). Postgraduate research supervision in a socially distributed knowledge system: some thoughts: perspectives on higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(3), 5057. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272326344_Postgraduate_research_supervision_in_a_socially_distributed_knowledge_system_some_thoughts
  39. Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J. & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917708
  40. Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring (2nd ed.). Hampshire, England: Gower.
  41. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ad53/b9655587771edcf4ae028d4490a218d87ff2.pdf
  42. Moser-Mercer, B. (2014). MOOCs in fragile contexts. European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit. Retrieved from http://virtualinstitute.fti.unige.ch/inzone12/Media-Upload_Xvc78HxeZ34xv/Kcfinder/files/MOOCs%20in%20Fragile%20Contexts.pdf
  43. Mouton, J. (2007). Post-graduate studies in South Africa: Myths, misconceptions and challenges. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(1), 10781090. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC37415
  44. Mustafaraj, E. (2014, March). What does enrollment in a MOOC mean? In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 203204). ACM. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556325.2567882
  45. Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2009). Re-engineering graduate skills–a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 131139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043790902829281
  46. Nchinda, T. C. (2002). Research capacity strengthening in the South. Social science & medicine, 54(11), 16991711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00338-0
  47. Norberg, A., Händel, Å., & Ödling, P. (2015). Using MOOCs at learning centers in Northern Sweden. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2035
  48. Panda, S. (2016). Personality Traits and the Feeling of Loneliness of Post-Graduate University Students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(3), 2737. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2016/1170-1460578509.pdf
  49. Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
  50. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/152
  51. Sandeen, C. (2013). Integrating MOOCs into traditional higher education: The emerging “MOOC 3.0” era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 3439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.842103
  52. Siemens, G., Irvine, V., & Code, J. (2013). Guest editors’ preface to the special issue on MOOCs: An academic perspective on an emerging technological and social trend. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), iii. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1500421435?accountid=14500
  53. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 17211731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
  54. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., Gozza-Cohen, M., Wilde, J., & Jian, S. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 8995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.002
  55. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
  56. Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0953/6f809fae9debdebb337f840b02d12ea0b2cc.pdf
  57. Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The Community of Inquiry framework ten years later: introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.003
  58. Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching?. Computers & Education, 81, 191201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015
  59. Tik, C. C. (2016). Community of Inquiry for Graduate Certificate in Higher Education. Psychology Research, 6(1), 2431. Retrieved from http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/56cd63d2c73c6.pdf
  60. Waldrop, M. M. (2013). Massive open online courses are transforming higher education-and providing fodder for scientific research. Nature, 495(440), 160163. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/online-learning-campus-2-0-1.12590
  61. Vaughan, N. & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.11.001
  62. Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(3), 301320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290701486720
  63. Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). White paper on MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards (CETIS), 121. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667
Language: English
Page range: 207 - 221
Submitted on: Jan 21, 2017
Accepted on: Apr 14, 2017
Published on: Apr 1, 2017
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Tasneem Jaffer, Shanali Govender, Cheryl Brown, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.