Fostering Symbiosis Between E-tutors and Lecturers of an English Studies Module at an Open Distance Learning University in South Africa
By: Thembeka Shange
References
- Burke, K., & Larmar, S. (2021). Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5), 601–615. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2020.1804536
- College of Human Sciences. (2019). E-tutor adverts. University of South Africa.
- Caga, N. P., & Skhephe, M. (2019, September 15–18). The role of mobile technology in English first additional language learning: What students have to say. Paper presented, South Africa International Conference on Education, Pretoria, South Africa.
- Dzakiria, H., & Idrus, R. M. (2005). Interaction in Open Distance Learning: Research Issues in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 7(2), 63–77.
- Fiock, H. S. (2020). Designing a Community of Inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
- Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 84–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
- Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland- Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. DOI: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
- Joubert, Y. T., & Snyman, A. M. (2018). Challenges experienced with online tutoring in an ODL institution. Progressio Journal for Open Distance Learning Practice, 39(1), 126–145.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323349632 . DOI: 10.25159/0256-8853/2139 - Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
https://www.usf.edu/atle/documents/handout . DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 - Kopp, B., Matteuci, M. C., & Tomasetto, C. (2012). E-tutorial support for collaborative online Education, 58 learning: An explorative study on experienced and inexperienced e-tutors. Computers in 1, 12–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.019
- Lowenthal, D. A., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2010, April). A mixed methods examination of instructor social presence in accelerated online courses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
- Mare, S. M., & Mutezo, A. T. (2021). The effectiveness of e-tutoring in an open and distance e-learning environment: Evidence from the University of South Africa. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2020.1717941
- Ngubane- Mokiwa, S., & Letseka, M. (2015).
Shift from open distance learning to open distance e-learning . In M. Letseka (Ed.), Open Distance Learning (ODL) in South Africa. New York: Nova Publishers. - Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
- Rahman, M. S. (2017). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 109. DOI: 10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
- Rose, E. (2017). Beyond social presence: Facelessness and the ethics of asynchronous online education. McGill Journal of Education, 52(1), 17–32. DOI: 10.7202/1040802ar
- Rose, E., & Adams, C. (2014). “Will I ever connect with the students?”: Online Teaching and the Pedagogy of Care. Phenomenology & Practice, 7(2), 5–16.
https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/cf8e141d-bdfa-4415-9ab1-e78d04bb5958 . DOI: 10.29173/pandpr20637 - Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2). 252. DOI: 10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
- Saxena, K., & Panigrahi, M. R. (2019). Quality Assurance Toolkit for Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Institution. New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre.
- Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 2, 63–75. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
- Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. Sage Publications.
- Tait, A. (2000). Planning Student Support for Open and Distance Learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 15(3), 287–299. DOI: 10.1080/713688410
Tutorial Letter 501 for ENG1503 . Department of English Studies, University of South Africa.- Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the Blended Learning literature: Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18, 380–393.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282686856 - Wiid, J. A., Cant, M. C., & Kallier, S. M. (2015). The perceptions of students on the use of social networking systems as a teaching tool in ODL institutions. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 14(1), 27–38. DOI: 10.19030/iber.v14i1.9029
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.3.135 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 253 - 263
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 29, 2021
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Thembeka Shange, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.