Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Social Presence on Students’ Satisfaction toward Online Course Cover

The Influence of Social Presence on Students’ Satisfaction toward Online Course

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital Compass Learning: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson survey research group. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580868.pdf
  2. Alman, S. W., Frey, B. A., & Tomer, C. (2012). Social and cognitive presence as factors in learning and student retention: An investigation of the cohort model in an iSchool setting. Journal of Education for library and Information Science, 53(4), 290302. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43686922
  3. Baharudin, H., Nasir, M. K. M., Yusoff, N. M. R. N., & Surat, S. (2018). Assessing Students’ Course Satisfaction with Online Arabic Language Hybrid Course. Advanced Science Letters, 24(1), 350352. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12005
  4. Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 10(1), 2744. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103
  5. Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.024
  6. Çakiroğlu, Ü. (2019). Community of Inquiry in Web Conferencing: Relationships between Cognitive Presence and Academic Achievements. Open Praxis, 11(3), 243260. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.968
  7. Choi, H. J., & Kim, B. U. (2018). Factors affecting adult student dropout rates in the Korean cyber-university degree programs. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1400357
  8. Cobb, S. C. (2011). Social presence, satisfaction, and perceived learning of RN-to-BSN students in web-based nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 115119. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.115
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314325. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/croxton_0614.pdf
  11. De Paepe, L., Zhu, C., & DePryck, K. (2018). Drop-out, Retention, Satisfaction and Attainment of Online Learners of Dutch in Adult Education. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(3), 303323. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/174173
  12. Feng, X., Xie, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Scaffold Online Tutoring. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2362
  13. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  14. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  15. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 3136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
  16. Hamat, A., Embi, M. A., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2010). Sistem Pengurusan e-Pembelajaran di IPT Malaysia. In M. A. Embi (Ed.), Amalan, Keberkesanan & Cabaran Perlaksanaan e-Pembelajaran (pp. 2951). Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi.
  17. Ho, R. C., Mak, K., Tao, R., Lu, Y., Day, J. R., & Pan, F. (2013). Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities. BMC medical research methodology, 13(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13–74
  18. Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 112.
  19. Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2013). Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 7786.
  20. Howell, G. F., & Buck, J. M. (2012). The Adult Student and Course Satisfaction: What Matters Most? Innovative higher education, 37(3), 215226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9201-0
  21. Kara, M., Erdoğdu, F., Kokoç, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2019). Challenges faced by adult learners in online distance education: A literature review. Open Praxis, 11(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.929
  22. Khalid, N. M., & Quick, D. (2016). Teaching Presence Influencing Online Students’ Course Satisfaction at an Institution of Higher Education. International Education Studies, 9(3), 62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p62
  23. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development Butterworth-Heinemann (8 ed.). Routledge.
  24. Lacey, S., & Lawson, R. (2013). Multisensory imagery. Springer Science & Business Media.
  25. Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
  26. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education [MMOHE] (2017). Pelan strategik interim Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia 2011-2020. P. N. Berhad. http://www.mohe.gov.my/transformasi/fasa2/psptn-fasa2.pdf
  27. Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education. 3(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
  28. Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 33(3), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231
  29. Richardson, J. C., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Ice, P., Swan, K. P., & Garrison, D. R. (2012). Using the community of inquiry framework to inform effective instructional design. In The Next Generation of Distance Education (pp. 97-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_7
  30. Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001
  31. Rustici Software (2016). Ask us anything. http://scorm.com/scorm-explained/
  32. Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110-129. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.1984
  33. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
  34. Spears, L. R. (2012). Social Presence, Social Interaction, Collaborative Learning, and Satisfaction in Online and Face-to-Face Courses (Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12976.) Iowa State University. Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12976
  35. Spiro, D. (2011). Examining instructor and student perspectives of online interaction through the community of inquiry model (Publication Number 3492391). Nova Southeastern University.
  36. Stewart, W. (2019). The complexity of transnational distance students: A review of the literature. Open Praxis, 11(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.923
  37. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
  38. Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2(24), 1-12.
  39. Taghizadeh, M., & Vaezi, S. (2011). Exploring social presence in virtual learning environment. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(1), 120-128.
  40. Tirrell, T., & Quick, D. (2012). Chickering’s seven principles of good practice: Student attrition in community college online courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(8), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920903054907
  41. Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American journal of distance education, 16(3), 131-150.
  42. World, E. (2020). How to engage Elearners through questioning Techniques. https://yourelearningworld.com/engaging-elearners-through-questioning-techniques/
  43. Yu, T., & Richardson, J. C. (2015). Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Community of Inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.004
  44. Zimmerman, T. D., & Nimon, K. (2017). The Online Student Connectedness Survey: Evidence of Initial Construct Validity. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2484
Language: English
Page range: 485 - 493
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 7, 2020
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 M. Khalid M. Nasir, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.