Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Evaluation of Online Proctoring Tools Cover

An Evaluation of Online Proctoring Tools

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., Bailer, A. J., & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores.Online Learning, 21(1), 146161. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.885
  2. Barnes, C., & Paris, B. L. (2013). An analysis of academic integrity techniques used in online courses at a southern university. In Northwest Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting Proceedings.
  3. Beck, V. (2014). Testing a model to predict online cheating—Much ado about nothing. Active learning in higher education, 15(1), 6575. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787413514646
  4. Bedford, W., Gregg, J., & Clinton, S. (2009). Implementing technology to prevent online cheating: Acase study at a small southern regional university (SSRU). MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 230238.
  5. Berkey, D., & Halfond, J. (2015, July 20). Cheating, Student Authentication and Proctoring in Online Programs. New England Journal of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://nebhe.org/journal/cheating-student-authentication-and-proctoring-in-online-programs/
  6. Brown, V. (2018). Evaluating technology to prevent academic integrity violations in online environments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(1). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring211/brown211.html
  7. Carstairs, J., & Myors, B. (2009). Internet testing: A natural experiment reveals test score inflation on a high-stakes, unproctored cognitive test. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 738742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.01.011
  8. Casey, D. M. (2008). A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0135-z
  9. CAUDIT/ACODE (2020). CAUDIT/ACODE Forum on e-exams. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from https://www.acode.edu.au/
  10. Cramp, J., Medlin, J. F., Lake, P., & Sharp, C. (2019). Lessons learned from implementing remotely invigilated online exams. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1), 10. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol16/iss1/10/
  11. Crowdmark (2020). Crowdmark is a collaborative online grading and analytics platform. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from https://crowdmark.com/
  12. Etter, S., Cramer, J. J., & Finn, S. (2006). Origins of academic dishonesty: Ethical orientations and personality factors associated with attitudes about cheating with information technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 133155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782477
  13. Foster, D., & Layman, H. (2013). Online proctoring systems compared. Retrieved from https://caveon.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Online-Proctoring-Systems-Compared-Mar-13-2013.pdf
  14. Gautam, M. (2017, December 20). 3 types of online proctoring services and how to select the best for hiring. Hackerearth. Retrieved from https://www.hackerearth.com/blog/talent-assessment/online-proctoring-for-hiring-developer
  15. Grijalva, T. C., Kerkvliet, J., & Nowell, C. (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal, 40(1), 180185.
  16. Harmon, O. R., & Lambrinos, J. (2008). Are online exams an invitation to cheat? The Journal of Economic Education, 39(2), 116125. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125
  17. Harmon, O. R., Lambrinos, J., & Buffolino, J. (2010). Assessment design and cheating risk in online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/Fall133/harmon_lambrinos_buffolino133.html
  18. Hollister, K. K., & Berenson, M. L. (2009). Proctored versus unproctored online exams: Studying the impact of exam environment on student performance. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 271294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x
  19. Jose, S. (2016, December 15). Online proctoring is trending: Here is all you must know. Talview. Retrieved from https://blog.talview.com/a-complete-guide-to-online-remote-proctoring
  20. Karim, M. N., Kaminsky, S. E., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 555572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z
  21. King, C. G., Guyette Jr, R. W., & Piotrowski, C. (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 111.
  22. Kinney, N. E. (2001). A guide to design and testing in online psychology courses. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 1620.
  23. Kolski, T., & Weible, J. L. (2019). Do Community College Students Demonstrate Different Behaviors from Four-Year University Students on Virtual Proctored Exams? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(10–11), 690701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1600615
  24. Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2015). Post-graduate student performance in ‘supervised in-class’ vs. ‘unsupervised online’ multiple choice tests: implications for cheating and test security. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(7), 883897. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956683
  25. Lanier, M. M. (2006). Academic integrity and distance learning. Journal of criminal justice education, 17(2), 244261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250600866166
  26. Mitra, S., & Gofman, M. I. (2016). Towards Greater Integrity in Online Exams. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Association For Information Systems.
  27. Moten Jr, J., Fitterer, A., Brazier, E., Leonard, J., & Brown, A. (2013). Examining online college cyber cheating methods and prevention measures. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 11(2), 139146.
  28. Prisacari, A. A., & Danielson, J. (2017). Computer-based versus paper-based testing: Investigating testing mode with cognitive load and scratch paper use. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.044
  29. Proctorio (2019). A Comprehensive Learning Integrity Platform. Retrieved from https://www.proctorio.com/
  30. Richardson, R., & North, M. (2013). Strengthening the trust in online courses: a common sense approach. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 266272.
  31. Rose, C. (2009). Virtual proctoring in distance education: An open-source solution. American Journal of Business Education, 2(2), 8188.
  32. Schultz, M. C., Schultz, J. T., & Gallogly, J. (2007). The management of testing in distance learning environments. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4(9), 1926. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v4i9.1543
  33. Sietses, L. (2016). White Paper Online Proctoring. Questions and answers about remote proctoring. SURFnet. Retrieved from https://www.surf.nl/files/2019-04/whitepaper-online-proctoring_en.pdf
  34. Tao, J., & Li, Z. (2012). A Case Study on Computerized Take-Home Testing: Benefits and Pitfalls. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 8(1), 3343.
  35. Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the digital age: Do students cheat more in online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring131/watson131.html
  36. Wellman, G. S., & Marcinkiewicz, H. (2004). Online learning and time-on-task: Impact of proctored vs. un-proctored testing. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 93104.
  37. Yates, R.W., & Beaudrie, B. (2009). The impact of online assessment on grades in community college distance education mathematics courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 6270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902850601
Language: English
Page range: 509 - 525
Submitted on: Apr 24, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 30, 2020
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Mohammed Juned Hussein, Javed Yusuf, Arpana Sandhya Deb, Letila Fong, Som Naidu, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.