Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Opening World Regional Geography: A Case Study Cover

Opening World Regional Geography: A Case Study

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. American Association of Geographers (n.d.) Diversity and Inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.aag.org/cs/programs/diversity
  2. Atkins, D., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Retrieved from http://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf
  3. Bliss, T. J., Hilton III, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972
  4. Burchfield, C.M., & Sappington, J. (2000). Compliance with required reading assignments. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 5860. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07173-017
  5. Chikuni, P. R.Cox, G., &Czerniewicz, L. (2019). Exploring the Institutional OER Policy Landscape in South Africa: Dominant Discourses and Assumptions. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 15(4), 165179. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239627.pdf
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  7. Clump, M. A., Bauer, H., & Bradley, C. (2004). The Extent to which Psychology Students Read Textbooks: A Multiple Class Analysis of Reading across the Psychology Curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ774105
  8. Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 18(5), 1534. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
  9. Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127143. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
  10. Feldstein, A., Martin, M., Hudson, A., Warren, K., Hilton III, J., & Wiley, D. (2012). Open textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ992490
  11. Florida Virtual Campus (2012). 2012 Florida student textbook survey. Tallahassee. Retrieved from https://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/pdf/2012_Florida_Student_Textbook_Survey.pdf
  12. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2013). College Textbooks: Students Have Greater Access to Textbook Information. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/-assets/660/655066.pdf
  13. Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 313.
  14. Hendricks, C., Reinsberg, S. A., & Rieger, G. W. (2017). The Adoption of an Open Textbook in a Large Physics Course: An Analysis of Cost, Outcomes, Use, and Perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3006
  15. Hewlett Foundation (2020). Open educational resources. Retrieved from https://hewlett.org/strategy/open-educational-resources/
  16. Hilton III, J. L., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1523
  17. Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
  18. Hilton, J. (2019a). Recent Research on OER. Presented at OpenEd 2019, Phoenix, AZ.
  19. Hilton, J. (2019b). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: a synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
  20. Illowsky, B., Hilton III, J., Whiting, J., & Ackerman, J. (2016). Examining student perception of an open statistics book. Open Praxis, 8(3), 265276. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.304
  21. Jhangiani, R. S., & Jhangiani, S. (2017). Investigating the perceptions, use, and impact of open textbooks: A survey of post-secondary students in British Columbia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3012
  22. Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). JIME - The Open Learning Initiative: Measuring the Effectiveness of the OLI Statistics Course in Accelerating Student Learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1), Art. 13. http://doi.org/10.5334/2008-14
  23. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A., & Fink, L. D. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  24. National Association of College Stores (NACS) (2014). College Students Still Prefer Print Textbooks to Digital. Retrieved from https://www.nacs.org/advocacynewsmedia/pressreleases/collegestudentsstillpreferprinttextbookstodigital.aspx
  25. Navarrete, R., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Bridging the accessibility gap in Open Educational Resources. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(4), 755774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0529-9
  26. Open Education Group (n.d.). The COUP framework. Retrieved from https://openedgroup.org/coup
  27. Pawlyshyn, N., Braddlee, D., Casper, L., & Miller, H. (2013). Adopting OER: A case study of crossinstitutional collaboration and innovation. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/adopting-oer-a-case-study-of-crossinstitutional-collaboration-and-innovation
  28. Seaman, J., & Seaman, J. (2018). Freeing the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2018. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/oer.html
  29. Tuomi, I. (2013). Open educational resources and the transformation of education. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 5878. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12019
  30. University of Mary Washington (2019). 2018–2019 Common Data Set. Retrieved from https://academics.umw.edu/iae/institutional-research-2/common-data-sets-ms-excel-files/common-data-set-2/
  31. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, September 12). Consumer price index—all urban consumers: College textbooks. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/data/
  32. Warne, R. T. (2018). Statistics for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442715
  33. Weller, M., De los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, B., & McAndrew, P. (2015). The impact of OER on teaching and learning practice. Open Praxis, 7(4), 351361. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.227
  34. Wiley, D., Hilton III, J. L., Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 262276. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1153
  35. Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
Language: English
Page range: 271 - 282
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2020
Accepted on: May 31, 2020
Published on: Jun 30, 2019
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Caitlin Finlayson, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.