Establishing a MOOC quality assurance framework – a case study
References
- ACHIEVE (2011). Rubrics for Evaluating Open Education Resource (OER) Objects. Retrieved from: http://achieve.org/files/AchieveOERRubrics_1.pdf
- Atenas, J., & Havemann, L. (2014). Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 22, https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20889
- Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
- Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
- Brown, J. S. (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Mit Press.
- Camilleri, A.F., Ehlers, U.D., & Pawlowski, J. (2014). State of the art review of quality issues related to open educational resources (OER). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J. C., … & La Manna, M. (2002). Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved by http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org
- De Benito Crosetti, B., & Salinas, J.M. (2016). La investigación basada en diseño en Tecnología Educativa. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 0. Retrieved from http://revistas.um.es/riite/article/view/260631
- Dietze, S., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Ebner, H., Qing Yu, H., Giordano, D., Marenzi, I., & Pereira Nunes, B. (2013). Interlinking educational resources and the web of data: A survey of challenges and approaches. Program, 47(1), 60–91 https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331211296312
- EuroPACE (2010). Interests – Virtual mobility. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.europace.org/interest3.php
- Firssova, O., & Rajagopal, K. (2018). Open VM Competence Framework. Retrieved from https://www.openvirtualmobility.eu/topics/outputs
- Jansen, D., Rosewell, J., & Kear, K. (2017). Quality frameworks for MOOCs. In Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs (pp. 261–281). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Lowenthal, P., & Hodges, C. (2015). In search of quality: Using Quality Matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online, courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348
- Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education 80, 77–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
- OECD (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/38654317.pdf
- Pawlowski, J.M. (2007). The quality adaptation model: adaptation and adoption of the quality standard ISO/IEC 19796-1 for learning, education, and training. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 3–16.
- Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., López, J., & Caro, E.T. (2015, March). Towards a learning analytics approach for supporting discovery and reuse of OER an approach based on Social Networks Analysis and Linked Open Data. In 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 978–988). IEEE.
- Poce, A., Agrusti, F., & Re, M.R. (2015) Sviluppo di uno strumento di valutazione delle risorse aperte (OERs). Analisi dei dati raccolti: abitudini nell’uso della tecnologia e di scrittura. CADMO, Giornale Italiano di Pedagogia sperimentale. An International Journal of Educational Research, 23(2), 86–92.
- Poce, A., Re, M.R., Amenduni, F., & Valente, M. (2019). MOOC and OERs in a Virtual Mobility Experience. In EMOOCs-WIP (pp. 181–186).
- Salinas, J. (2012). La investigación ante los desafíos de los escenarios de aprendizaje futuros. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 32. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/32
- Shavelson, R.J., Phillips, D.C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M.J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001025
- St. Lifer, E. (2018, January 11). Five Ed-Tech Elephants: From OER to equitable access, challenges to the digital revolution persist. School Library Journal, 1, 12. Retrieved from https://www.slj.com/?detailStory=the-five-ed-tech-elephants-in-the-prek-12-classroom-opinion
- Stracke, C.M., & Tan, E. (2018). The quality of open online learning and education: Towards a quality reference framework for MOOCs.
- Tappeiner, L., DiSanto, J.M., & Lyons, K. (2019). Expanding Access to Education Through Open Educational Resources (OERs). In Developing Educational Technology at an Urban Community College (pp. 135–146). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
- Tuomi, I. (2006). Open Educational Resources: What they are and why do they Matter. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/oer
- Tur, G., Urbina, S., Firssova, O., Rajagopal, K., & Buchem, I. (2018). Open Virtual Mobility: A Learning Design 4 SRL. In EDEN Research Workshop 2018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1019 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 451 - 460
Submitted on: Jul 25, 2019
Accepted on: Oct 7, 2019
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2019 Antonella Poce, Francesca Amenduni, Maria Rosaria Re, Carlo De Medio, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.