Skip to main content

Are MOOCs Open Educational Resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs Cover

Are MOOCs Open Educational Resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs

Volume 11 (2019): Issue 4

By: Christian M. Stracke , Stephen Downes , Grainne Conole, Daniel Burgos and Fabio Nascimbeni

Open Access

|Dec 2019

Abstract

Open Education gained more visibility as a result of the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OER) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This article discusses whether MOOCs should be considered as OER. Open Education and OER can be treated as two strands with different historical roots even though, in theory, OER are an aspect of Open Education. Different OER definitions and typologies are analyzed in relation to their dimensions and categorizations. Furthermore, the four conditions and two original categories of MOOCs are discussed, leading to a debate on their quality. It turns out that there are two perspectives on MOOCs: from an OER perspective, MOOCs as a product can be called OER. From an Open Education perspective, MOOCs are going beyond OER as enablers of Open Education and are understood as an innovative way of changing education. These perspectives are reflected by the OpenEd Quality Framework. The short answer to our leading question is: sometimes, and it depends on your perspective.

References

Abdolrasulnia, M., Collins, B.C., Casebeer, L., Wall, T., Spettell, C., Ray, M.N., … & Allison, J.J. (2004). Using email reminders to engage physicians in an Internet-based CME intervention. BMC medical education, 4(1), 17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Atkins, D.E., Brown, J.S., & Hammond, A.L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Menlo Park: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bozkurt, A., Kilgore, W., & Crosslin, M. (2018). Bot-teachers in hybrid massive open online courses (MOOCs): A post-humanist experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3273
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Butcher, N., & Moore, A. (2015). Understanding Open Educational Resources. Kingsway: Commonwealth of Learning.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chi, M.T.H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conole, G. (2015). Designing effective MOOCs, Educational Media International, 52(4), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1125989
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conole, G., & Brown, M. (2018). Reflecting on the impact of the Open Education Movement. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 187–203. Retrieved from https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/314/346
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Retrieved from http://sirjohn.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/120925MOOCspaper2.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
D’Antoni, S. (2009). Open Educational Resources: reviewing initiatives and issues, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510802625443
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davidson, C. (2013). What Was the First MOOC? Retrieved from https://www.hastac.org/blogs/cathy-davidson/2013/09/27/what-was-first-mooc
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deming, W.E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Donabedian, A. (1980). The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment [= Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, vol. 1]. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Downes, S. (1996). Stephen’s Guide to the Logical Fallacies. Retrieved from: https://www.fallacies.ca/welcome.htm
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. Retrieved from http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dunbar, R. (1998). The Social Brain Hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6(5), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5%3C178::AID-EVAN5%3E3.0.CO;2-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gaskell, A., & Mills, R. (2014). The quality and reputation of open, distance and e-learning: what are the challenges? Open Learning, 29(3), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.993603
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hilton, J., III, Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Williams, L. (2017). Maintaining momentum toward graduation: OER and the course throughput rate. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2686
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodges, C. (2008). Self-efficacy, motivational email, and achievement in an asynchronous math course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 265–285.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaffer, T., Govender, S., & Brown, C. (2017). “The best part was the contact!”: Understanding postgraduate students’ experiences of wrapped MOOCs. Open Praxis, 9(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.565
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Juran, J.M. (1992). Juran on quality by design. The new steps for planning quality into goods and services. New York: Free Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Juran, J.M. (Ed.) (1951). Quality Control Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knox, J. (2013). The Limitations of Access Alone: Moving Towards Open Processes in Education Technology. Open Praxis, 5(1), 21–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A., & Williams, S. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McAndrew, P. (2010). Defining openness: updating the concept of ‘open’ for a connected world. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2010/10, 1–13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mulder, F. (2013). The logic of national policies and strategies for open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1536
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nascimbeni, F. (2018). “The night of the living MOOCs”: a feasible and high-impact proposal. Retrieved from https://education.okfn.org/the-night-of-the-living-moocs-a-feasible-and-high-impact-proposal/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Campbell, L.M., & Tabacco, A. (2018). Institutional mapping of open educational practices beyond use of Open Educational Resources. Distance Education, 39(4), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520040
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nyberg, D. (1975). The philosophy of open education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OpenEdOz (2016). Students, universities and Open Education, final report. Retrieved from http://openedoz.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/02/ID14-3972_CSU_Wills_Final-Report_2016.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puentedura, R.R. (2013). SAMR and TPCK: An introduction. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/03/28/SAMRandTPCK_AnIntroduction.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reich, J. (2015). Rebooting MOOC research. Science, 347(6217), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261627
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shah, D. (2018, January 22). A Product at Every Price: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2017. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, C.D., Whiteley, H.E., & Smith, S. (1999). Using email for teaching. Computers & Education, 33(1), 15–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M. (2015). The Need to Change Education towards Open Learning. In C.M. Stracke & T. Shamarina-Heidenreich (Eds.), The Need for Change in Education: Openness as Default? (pp. 11–23).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M. (2017a). The Quality of MOOCs: How to improve the design of open education and online courses for learners? In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Novel Learning Ecosystems. LCT 2017, Part I, LNCS 10295 (pp. 285–293). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58509-3_23
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M. (2017b). Why we need High Drop-out Rates in MOOCs: New Evaluation and Personalization Strategies for the Quality of Open Education. In M. Chang, N.-S. Chen, R. Huang, Kinshuk, D.G. Sampson, & R. Vasiu (Eds.), The 17th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2017) (pp. 13–15). IEEE: Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.109
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M. (2018). Como a Educação Aberta pode melhorar a qualidade de aprendizagem e produzir impacto em alunos, organizações e na sociedade? In M. Duran, T. Amiel, & C. Costa (Eds.), Utopias and Distopias da Tecnologia na Educação a Distância e Aberta (pp. 499–545). Campinas: & Niterói: UNICAMP & UFF.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M. (2019). Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4213
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M., & Tan, E. (2018). The Quality of Open Online Learning and Education: Towards a Quality Reference Framework for MOOCs. In Rethinking learning in the digital age. Making the Learning Sciences Count: International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1029–1032). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1820/9909
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M., Tan, E., Texeira, A.M., Pinto, M., Kameas, A., Vassiliadis, B., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2018b). Gap between MOOC designers’ and MOOC learners’ perspectives on interaction and experiences in MOOCs: Findings from the Global MOOC Quality Survey. In Proceedings 18th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.0000
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stracke, C.M., Tan, E., Texeira, A., Pinto, M., Vassiliadis, B., Kameas, A., Sgouropoulou, C., & Vidal, G. (2018a). Quality Reference Framework (QRF) for the Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Retrieved from http://www.mooc-quality.eu/QRF
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tuomi, I. (2013). Open Educational Resources and the Transformation of Education, European Journal of Education, 48(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
UNESCO (2002). Forum on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries: Final report (CI-2002/CONF.803/CLD.1). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://-unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
UNESCO (2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration (Paris, UNESCO). Retrieved from www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/Paris%20OER%20Declaration_01.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
UNESCO (2017). Second world OER congress Ljubljana OER action plan. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ljubljana_oer_action_plan_2017.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
UNESCO (2019). Draft Recommendation on Open Educational Resources. UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370936.locale=en
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Washington: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E]
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 198–221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weller, M., Jordan, K., DeVries, I., & Rolfe, V. (2018). Mapping the Open Education Landscape: Citation Network Analysis of Historical Open and Distance Education Research. Open Praxis, 10(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.822
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiley, D. (2007, August 8). Open Education License Draft [Blog post]. Iterating toward openness. Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/355
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The Access Compromise and the 5th R [blog post]. Iterating toward openness. Retrieved from https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiley, D., & Gurrell, S. (2009). A decade of development …. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510802627746
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What Research Says About MOOCs – An Explorative Content Analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Figures & tables

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1010 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 331 - 341

Submitted on: Jul 23, 2019

|

Accepted on: Oct 7, 2019

|

Published on: Dec 31, 2019

Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

Open Education,

Massive Open Online Courses,

Open Educational Resources,

literature review,

OpenEd Quality Framework

© 2019 Christian M. Stracke, Stephen Downes, Grainne Conole, Daniel Burgos, Fabio Nascimbeni, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 11 (2019): Issue 4

Previous article