Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Findings from a Case Study on Refugees Using MOOCs to (Re)enter Higher Education Cover

Findings from a Case Study on Refugees Using MOOCs to (Re)enter Higher Education

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3.66
  2. Amemado, D., & Manca, S. (2017). Learning from decades of online distance education: MOOCs and the Community of Inquiry Framework. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 2132. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1339
  3. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
  4. Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Aydin, C. H. (2017). Current status of the MOOC movement in the world and reaction of the Turkish higher education institutions. Open Praxis, 9(1), 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.463
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  7. Bossu, C., & Stagg, A. (2018). The potential role of Open Educational Practice policy in transforming Australian higher education. Open Praxis, 10(2), 145157. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.835
  8. Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., … Aydin, C. H. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1953
  9. Bozkurt, A., Yazıcı, M., & Aydın, İ. E. (2018). Cultural diversity and its implications in online networked learning spaces. In Supporting multiculturalism in open and distance learning spaces (pp. 5681). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3076-3.ch004
  10. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
  11. Carlsen, A., Holmberg, C., Neghina, C., & Owusu-Boampong, A. (2016). Closing the gap: Opportunities for distance education to benefit adult learners in higher education. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL).
  12. Cho, M.-H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 34(February), 1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001
  13. Clark-Kazak, C. (2017). Ethical considerations: research with people in situations of forced migration. Refuge, 33(2), 1117. Retrieved from https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/40467
  14. Cohen, A., & Holstein, S. (2018). Analysing successful massive open online courses using the community of inquiry model as perceived by students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (January), 113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12259
  15. Colucci, E., Muñoz, J. C., & Devaux, A. (2017). MOOCs and Free Digital Learning for the inclusion of migrants and refugees: A European policy study. In EMOOCS 2017 (pp. 96103). Madrid.
  16. Colucci, E., Smidt, H., Devaux, A., Vrasidas, C., Safarjalani, M., & Castaño Muñoz, J. (2017). Free Digital Learning opportunities for migrants and refugees: An analysis of current initiatives and recommendations for their further use. Luxemburg: Joint Research Centre, European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/684414
  17. Crea, T.M. (2015). Higher education for refugees: Lessons from a 4-year pilot project. International Review of Education, 61(2), 229239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9484-y
  18. Dolan, J., Kain, K., Reilly, J., & Bansal, G. (2017). How do you build community and foster engagement in online courses? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 151(Fall 2017), 4560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20248
  19. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Online educators’ recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action. Open Praxis, 10(1), 7989. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.721
  20. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  21. Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  22. Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 24, 6671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
  23. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  24. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 3136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
  25. Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  26. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough ? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Family Health International, 18(1), 5982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  27. Jaffer, T., Govender, S., & Brown, C. (2017). “The best part was the contact!”: Understanding postgraduate students’ experiences of wrapped MOOCs. Open Praxis, 9(2), 207221. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.565
  28. Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., Cukić, I., de Vries, P., … Gašević, D. (2018). Exploring Communities of Inquiry in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 119(April), 4458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.010
  29. Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 3550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  30. Mackenzie, C., McDowell, C., & Pittaway, E. (2007). Beyond “do no harm”: The challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 299319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem008
  31. Moreira, J. A., Ferreira, A. G., & Almeida, A. C. (2013). Comparing communities of inquiry of Portuguese higher education students: one for all or one for each? Open Praxis, 5(2), 165178. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.50
  32. Moser-Mercer, B. (2014). MOOCs in fragile contexts. In Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (pp. 114121). Lausanne: eLearning Papers, Open Education Europa.
  33. Moser-Mercer, B., Hayba, E., & Goldsmith, J. (2016). Higher education spaces and protracted displacement: How learner-centered pedagogies and human-centered design can unleash refugee innovation. In 2016 UNESCO Chair Conference on Technologies for Development: from Innovation to Social Impact. Lausanne.
  34. Murugesan, R., Nobes, A., & Wild, J. (2017). A MOOC approach for training researchers in developing countries. Open Praxis, 9(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.476
  35. Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014). Cultural translation in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). ELearning Papers, 37(March), 110.
  36. Nti, K. (2015). Supporting access to open online courses for learners of developing countries. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 156171. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2328
  37. Oliver, D. G., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: Towards reflection in qualitative research. Social Forces, 84(2), 12731289. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0023
  38. Patton, M. Q. (2015). The developmental evaluation mindset. In M. Q. Patton, K. McKegg, & N. Wehipeihana (Eds.), Developmental evaluation exemplars: Principles in practice (Kindle, pp. 289312). New York: The Guilford Press.
  39. Pitt, R., de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., & Weller, M. (2016). Open research. Milton Keynes: OER Hub.
  40. Pool, J., Reitsma, G., & van den Berg, D. (2017). Revised Community of Inquiry framework: examining learning presence in a blended mode of delivery. Online Learning, 21(3), 153165. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v
  41. Rambe, P., & Moeti, M. (2017). Disrupting and democratising higher education provision or entrenching academic elitism: towards a model of MOOCs adoption at African universities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 631651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9500-3
  42. Saunders, M. (2000). Beginning an evaluation with RUFDATA: Theorizing a practical approach to evaluation planning. Evaluation, 6(1), 721. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890022209082
  43. Saunders, M., Charlier, B., & Bonamy, J. (2005). Using evaluation to create ‘provisional stabilities’: Bridging innovation in higher education change processes. Evaluation, 11(1), 3754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005053188
  44. Scriven, M. (1996). Types of evaluation and types of evaluator. Evaluation Practice, 17(2), 151161. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409601700207
  45. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner Smith, S., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., … Jian, S. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the community of inquiry (CoI) framework. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 8995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.002
  46. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., … Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002
  47. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Vickers, J., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Reconceptualizing the Community of Inquiry framework: An exploratory analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 23, 917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.002
  48. Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
  49. Suter, R. & Rampelt, F. (2017). Digital Solutions for Alternative Routes Into Higher Education – Possibilities and Challenges of Digital Teaching and Learning Scenarios for Refugees: First Results From the Integral2 Project. In Proceedings of EDULEARN17 Conference 3rd-5th July 2017, Barcelona, Spain (pp.46404645).
  50. Themelis, C. (2014). Synchronous video communication for distance education: the educators’ perspective. Open Praxis, 6(3), 245256. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.3.128
  51. van de Oudeweetering, K., & Agirdag, O. (2018). MOOCS as accelerators of social mobility? A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.2307/26273863
  52. Witthaus, G. (2017, October 3). Using RUFDATA to plan an evaluation of open, online higher education for refugees and asylum seekers in Europe [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://artofelearning.org/2017/10/03/using-rufdata-to-plan-an-evaluation-of-open-online-higher-education-for--refugees-and-asylum-seekers-in-europe/
  53. Zimmermann, B. J. (1999). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (Vol. 16, pp. 15). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Language: English
Page range: 343 - 357
Submitted on: Jul 28, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 14, 2018
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Gabi Witthaus, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.