Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experimental Investigation of Volume Estimation Methods for Hydrogen Refueling Stations Cover

Experimental Investigation of Volume Estimation Methods for Hydrogen Refueling Stations

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Different tank categories in the SAE J2601.

PRESSURE CLASSWATER VOLUME OF CHSS (L)CHSS CAPACITY CATEGORY
H3549.7–99.4A
H3599.4–174B
H35174–248.6C
H7049.7–99.4A
H7099.4–174B
H70174–248.6C
H70>248.6D

[i] Abbreviation: CHSS: compressed hydrogen storage system.

Adapted from Table 8 from SAE International (2020).

Figure 1

Simplified P&ID of the HRS section between the control valve and the CHSS of the FCEV. The data measured by the dispenser and transmitted by the FCEV are reported in the figure.

Abbreviations: CHSS: compressed hydrogen storage system; FCEV: fuel cell electric vehicle; HRS: hydrogen refueling station; P&ID: piping and instrumentation diagram.

Figure 2

Flowchart of the diabatic formulation.

Table 2

Coefficient table for the polynomial functions Ciso(P, T), Cadia(P, T, Tinj) and Ccp–eff(P, T).

TERMCiso COEFFSCp-eff COEFFSCadia COEFFS
11.1283600E+068.0916516E+021.5907225E+06
Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+005.8152799E+03
Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+001.0473866E+00
Tinj30.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–4.3391871E–03
Tinj40.0000000E+000.0000000E+008.6699560E–06
Tinj50.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.4108136E–08
T4.1345584E+03–2.1782544E–01–2.2584316E+02
T*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.9014440E+00
T*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–5.9850516E–04
T*Tinj30.0000000E+000.0000000E+002.8617328E–06
T*Tinj40.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–1.9133298E–08
T2–3.9128813E–014.5885629E–022.3204987E+00
T2*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+002.6318857E–02
T2*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+003.2417329E–06
T2*Tinj30.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.6388874E–08
T34.8869951E–03–1.0613305E–03–1.9312110E–02
T3*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.0154968E–04
T3*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–9.3200198E–09
T41.0076258E–063.0320051E–062.1059983E–04
T4*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+008.5624925E–07
T5–1.6012029E–072.1608048E–08–1.0304455E–06
P1.3614112E+048.9668248E+032.1697410E+04
P*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+006.3710870E+01
P*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–4.5069595E–02
P*Tinj30.0000000E+000.0000000E+005.2637944E–05
P*Tinj40.0000000E+000.0000000E+001.5242998E–07
P*T2.2820956E+01–2.9038600E+01–5.3663267E+01
P*T*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.7913640E–01
P*T*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+001.0626895E–05
P*T*Tinj30.0000000E+000.0000000E+008.8698092E–08
P*T2–5.4810045E–026.9133477E–023.4922958E–01
P*T2*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+001.2330859E–03
P*T2*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–4.7593259E–09
P*T3–3.0271457E–04–2.8540368E–05–1.9932921E–03
P*T3*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.3767989E–06
P*T41.3146260E–06–2.6105553E–074.1096764E–06
P21.6414600E+02–5.0523257E+011.8501464E+02
P2*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–3.4170773E–01
P2*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+007.5245467E–04
P2*Tinj30.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–9.1746565E–07
P2*T–1.0389051E+003.1786849E–01–8.8709648E–01
P2*T*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+001.3000849E–03
P2*T*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–1.4771480E–07
P2*T23.2574499E–03–1.0656155E–031.5205511E–03
P2*T2*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–5.3952236E–06
P2*T3–1.8807052E–061.0760745E–065.8572045E–06
P3–1.5591316E+001.9073393E–01–1.9570425E+00
P3*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+001.3755835E–03
P3*Tinj20.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–3.6679280E–06
P3*T8.2229225E–03–1.6978191E–039.6192507E–03
P3*T*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–1.1676633E–06
P3*T2–1.7633706E–054.5014322E–06–1.8160604E–05
P49.6056237E–038.2909304E–051.2227065E–02
P4*Tinj0.0000000E+000.0000000E+00–2.6843097E–06
P4*T–2.4421704E–053.2439269E–06–3.1950194E–05
P5–2.7419060E–05–2.6875205E–06–3.4507177E–05
Figure 3

Flowchart of the iterative method.

Figure 4

View of the 243.6 L thermocouple tree. It is placed in front of the tank for visualization but is then inserted inside the tank volume during the refueling tests. A zoomed view at the upper tank part highlights with white circles the presence of the thermocouple probes on the thermocouple tree branches. The thermocouple tree is symmetrical.

Figure 5

Plotting of the experimental data measured during the eight refueling steps of the type IV 243.6 L tank.

Table 3

Numerical applications of the volume estimation formula based on the experimental data.

TEST #12345678
Ptank(t0) (MPa(g))2.811.4820.6131.122.7910.9820.7530.65
Tamb(t0) (°C)29.1530.5930.430.7727.7928.4129.1831.36
Tinj (°C)–20.05–18.75–16.54–16.7–27.45–26.03–27.94–29.06
Δt (s)3735342140373328
ΔPtank (MPa)2.232.993.432.382.343.083.53.67
Δm (kg)0.380.420.430.250.390.450.440.41
ΔTtank (°C)8.018.206.553.408.558.325.984.89
ΔTSAE (°C)23.9115.2410.368.0723.9215.6210.318.13
Viso (L)
Relative error %
220.2
–9.6
206.4 ⚠
–15.3
203.7 ⚠
–16.4
192.0 ⚠
–21.2
218.5
–10.3
208.8
–14.3
206.4 ⚠
–15.3
202.4 ⚠
–16.9
Viso–FO (L)
Relative error %
217.4
–10.8
202.9 ⚠
–16.7
199.8 ⚠
–18.0
189.5 ⚠
–22.2
215.5
–11.5
205.1 ⚠
–15.8
202.3 ⚠
–16.9
198.4 ⚠
–18.6
Vadia (L)
Relative error %
305.7 ⚠
25.5
287.0 ⚠
17.8
283.4 ⚠
16.3
268.8
10.3
303.2 ⚠
24.5
290.2 ⚠
19.1
287.1 ⚠
17.9
281.4 ⚠
15.5
Vdia (L)
Relative error %
249.6
2.5
240.5
–1.3
242.1
–0.6
232.0
–4.8
242.1
–0.6
238.2
–2.2
236.7
–2.8
232.5
–4.6
Vdia–approx (L)
Relative error %
252.7
3.7
239.2
–1.8
242.7
–0.4
231.6
–4.9
240.7
–1.2
240.8
–1.2
234.6
–3.7
234.9
–3.6
V0D–hotCaseCD (L)
Relative error %
258.9
6.3
247
1.4
247.6
1.6
229.5
–5.8
253.1
3.9
245.6
0.8
242.8
–0.3
240.8
1.2
V0D–hotCaseHD (L)
Relative error %
292.4 ⚠
20
280.5 ⚠
15.1
278.1
14.2
260.4
6.9
291.8 ⚠
19.8
283 ⚠
16.2
280.1 ⚠
15
279.3
14.7
V0D–coldCaseCD (L)
Relative error %
240.9
–1.1
234
–3.9
234.6
–3.7
217.2
–10.8
238.3
–2.2
234.8
–3.6
232.3
–4.6
231.3
–5
VSAE (L)
Relative error %
264.7
8.7
269.7
10.7
266.6
9.5
306.8 ⚠
25.9
261.4
7.3
270.6
11.1
269.0
10.4
269.2
10.5

[i] Cells indicate the relative error below the volume value. Volumes with errors greater than 15% are reported with the symbol ⚠ (reference volume 243.6 L).

Figure 6

Plotting of the experimental data measured during the six refueling steps of the type IV 1520 L tank.

Table 4

Numerical applications of the volume estimation formula based on the experimental data.

TEST #123456
Ptank(t0) (MPa(g))2.319.52.710.532.078.1
Tamb(t0) (°C)12.7823.0318.4822.8512.7825.58
Tinj (°C)–17.83–19.25–21.37–26.93–5.48–22.41
Δt (s)143146576593522
ΔPtank (MPa)1.422.420.711.068.470.25
Δm (kg)1.52.240.720.958.830.2
ΔTtank (°C)18.8411.7511.025.9930.511.79
ΔTSAE (°C)24.5624.0516.8315.9824.8718.08
Viso (L)
Relative error %
1292.5 ⚠
–15.0
1288.9 ⚠
–15.2
1268 ⚠
–16.6
1249.7 ⚠
–17.8
1345.9
–11.5
1108.5 ⚠
–27.1
Viso–FO (L)
Relative error %
1281.5 ⚠
–15.7
1270.3 ⚠
–16.4
1262.6 ⚠
–16.9
1241.8 ⚠
–18.3
1279.4 ⚠
–15.8
1106.9 ⚠
–27.2
Vadia (L)
Relative error %
1805.4 ⚠
18.8
1797.8 ⚠
18.3
1778.1 ⚠
17.0
1758.6 ⚠
15.7
1801 ⚠
18.5
1564.4
2.9
Vdia (L)
Relative error %
1460.4
–3.9
1492.2
–1.8
1469.4
–3.3
1452.7
–4.4
1349.3
–11.2
1311.8
–13.7
Vdia–approx (L)
Relative error %
1463.0
–3.7
1490.8
–1.9
1469.7
–3.3
1454.8
–4.3
1335.9
–12.1
1288.8
–15.2
V0D–hotCaseCD (L)
Relative error %
1548
1.8
1535
1.0
1539
1.3
1480
–2.6
1584
4.2
1335
–12.2
V0D–hotCaseHD (L)
Relative error %
1575
3.6
1658
9.1
1658
9.1
1615
6.3
1583
4.1
1543
1.5
V0D–coldCaseCD (L)
Relative error %
1352
–11.1
1345
–11.5
1396
–8.2
1305
–14.1
1401
–7.8
1108.5 ⚠
–27.1
VSAE (L)
Relative error %
1643.2
8.1
1763.9 ⚠
16.0
2038.4 ⚠
34.1
2933.8 ⚠
93.0
1489.7
–2.0
–1156.7 ⚠
–176.1

[i] Cells indicate the relative error below the volume value. Volumes with errors greater than 15% are reported with the symbol ⚠ (reference volume 1520 L).

Language: English
Page range: 233 - 251
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2026
Published on: Jun 25, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Rémi Gonin, Fouad Ammouri, David Vempaire, Bikram Roy Chowdhury, Bo Lu, published by KIT Scientific Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.