Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Probability of Hydrogen Ignition: A Landscape Review and Gaps Assessment Cover

Probability of Hydrogen Ignition: A Landscape Review and Gaps Assessment

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Acton, M., Acton, O. and Robinson, C. (2016) ‘A review of natural gas transmission pipeline incidents to derive ignition probabilities for risk assessment’, Hazards 26. Edinburgh, UK, 2426 May. Institution of Chemical Engineers.
  2. AIChE CCPS. (2008) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Al-Douri, A. and Groth, K.M. (2024) ‘Hydrogen production via electrolysis: State-of-the-art and research needs in risk and reliability analysis’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 63, pp. 775785. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.188
  4. Allason, D., Halford, A. and Johnson, D.M. (2025) ‘A Review of Hydrogen Ignition Probability Based on Large-Scale Test Results’, International Conference on Hydrogen Safety. Seoul, South Korea.
  5. Astbury, G.R. and Hawksworth, S.J. (2007) ‘Spontaneous ignition of hydrogen leaks: A review of postulated mechanisms’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(13), pp. 21782185. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.005
  6. Beeson, H. and Witte, T. (2023) Liquid Hydrogen: Safety and Design Considerations. Center for Hydrogen Safety, AIChE.
  7. BSI. (2019) BS EN 1127-1:2019: The Standard for Explosive atmospheres. BSI.
  8. Center for Chemical Process Safety. (2014) Guidelines for determining the probability of ignition of a released flammable mass. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety.
  9. Changlong, Z., Juncheng, J. and Xiongjun, Y. (2012) ‘Study on ignition probability of flammable materials after leakage accidents’, Procedia Engineering, 45, pp. 435441. Available at: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.182
  10. Cheikhravat, H., Chaumeix, N., Bentaib, A. and Pallard, C.-E. (2012) ‘Flammability limits of hydrogen-air mixtures’, Nuclear Technology, 178, pp. 516. Available at: 10.13182/NT12-A13543
  11. EPRI. (2024a) Executive Summary: Quantitative Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Energy Systems: Hydrogen Refueling Stations. EPRI.
  12. EPRI. (2024b) Quantitative Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Energy Systems: Hydrogen Refueling Stations. EPRI.
  13. EPRI. (2025a) Executive Summary: Quantitative Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Energy Systems-Electrolyzers. EPRI.
  14. EPRI. (2025b) Executive Summary: Quantitative Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Energy Systems-Hydrogen Transmission Pipelines. EPRI.
  15. EPRI. (2025c) Quantitative Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Energy Systems-Electrolyzers. EPRI.
  16. EPRI. (2025d) Quantitative Risk Assessment for Hydrogen Energy Systems-Hydrogen Transmission Pipelines. EPRI.
  17. Fossan, I. et al. (2024) The SAFEN ignition probability model for hydrogen. Naples, Italy, pp. 6882.
  18. Groethe, M. et al. (2007) ‘Large-scale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(13), pp. 21252133. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.016
  19. Hall, J. et al. (2021) ‘Characterisation, dispersion and electrostatic hazards of liquid hydrogen for the PRESLHY project’, International Conference on Hydrogen Safety 2021. Adelaide, Austrailia, HySAFE.
  20. Hankinson, G., Mathurkar, H. and Lowesmith, B. (2009) ‘Ignition energy and ignition probability of methane-hydrogen-air mixtures’, International Conference on Hydrogen Safety 2009, Ajaccio, Corsica, HySafe. Available at: https://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2009/images/stories/papers/125.pdf
  21. Health & Safety Laboratory. (2012) IA HYSAFE & JRC IET WORKSHOP: Research Priorities and Knowledge Gaps in Hydrogen Safety: Hydrogen Ignition and Light Up Probabilities. Available at: https://www.hysafe.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/7.-Hooker-Hydrogen-Ignition-and-Light-up-Probabilities-Part-1.pdf
  22. Hydrogen Tools. (n.d.) Lessons Learned. Available at: https://h2tools.org/lessons (Accessed: 16 December 2025).
  23. Lee, J.H. (1984) ‘Dynamic parameters of gaseous detonations’, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 16, pp. 311336. Available at: 10.1146/annurev.fl.16.010184.001523
  24. Lewis, B. and von Elbe, G. (1987) Combustion, flames and explosions of gases. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc.
  25. Mathurkar, H. (2009) Minimum ignition energy and ignition probability for Methane, Hydrogen and their mixtures. Doctoral thesis. Loughborough University.
  26. Meland, S.N. (2024) A case study of fire and explosion risk at hydrogen facilities, an ignition probability study. Master’s thesis. University of South-Eastern Norway.
  27. Merilo, E. et al. (2012) ‘Self-ignition of hydrogen releases through electrostatic discharge induced by entrained particulates’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(22), pp. 17561–17570. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.167
  28. Mével, R., Melguizo-Gavilanes, J., Boeck, L. and Shepherd, J. (2019) ‘Experimental and numerical study of the ignition of hydrogen-air mixtures by a localized stationary hot surface’, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 76, pp. 154169. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.02.005
  29. Moosemiller, M. (2011) ‘Development of algorithms for predicting ignition probabilities’, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24, pp. 259265. Available at: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.01.012
  30. Mulcahy, G. and Ehrhart, B.D. (2025) Towards Better Modeling the Probability of Hydrogen Ignition. SAND2025-13516: Sandia National Laboratories.
  31. Panda, P.P. and Hecht, E.S. (2017) ‘Ignition and flame characteristics of cryogenic hydrogen releases’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(1), pp. 775785. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.051
  32. Pesce, M. et al. (2012) ‘Modelling ignition probabilities within the framework of quantitative risk assessments’, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 26, pp. 141146.
  33. Proust, C. and Daubech, J. (2019) Hot surface ignition in flowing streams of hydrogen-air mixtures. Adelaide, Australia: HySAFE.
  34. Rew, P.J., Spencer, H. and Daycock, J. (2000) ‘Off-site ignition probability of flammable gases’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71(1), pp. 409422. Available at: 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00090-4
  35. Ronza, A., Vilchez, J. and Casal, J. (2007) ‘Using transportation accident databases to investigate ignition and explosion probabilities of flammable spills’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 146(1–2), pp. 106123. Available at: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.057
  36. Roth, D. et al. (2014) ‘Ignition by mechanical sparks: Ignition of hydrogen/air mixtures by submillimeter-sized hot particles. Combustion Science and Technology, 186(10–11), pp. 16061617. Available at: 10.1080/00102202.2014.935606
  37. Sanchez, R.H. (2023) Revisiting initiation mechanisms of gaseous detonations. Aix-Marseile Université.
  38. Schefer, R. et al. (2011) ‘Ignitability limits for combustion of unintended hydrogen releases: Experimental and theoretical results’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(3), pp. 24262435. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.004
  39. Simmons, J. (1974) Risk assessment of storage and transport of liquefied natural gas and LP-gas. Final report. Science Applications, Inc., McLean, Va. (USA).
  40. Tamburini, F., Wismer, S., Cozzani, V. and Groth, K. (2025) ‘Bayesian network model for assessing hydrogen ignition probability’, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, p. 111959. Available at: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111959
  41. Tchouvelev, A. (2008) Knowledge gaps in hydrogen safety: A White Paper. IEA.
  42. Tchouvelev, A., Hay, D. and Bénard, P. (2006) Quantitative risk comparison of hydrogen and CNG refuelling options.
  43. Tchouvelev, A., Hay, R. and Benard, P. (2007) Comparative risk estimation of compressed hydrogen and CNG refuelling options. pp. 1922.
  44. Uijt de Haag, P. and Ale, B. (2005) Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment. PGS ed. Hague.
  45. Vogelzang, B., Huijzer, E. and Delnooz, S. (2024) The Lower Flammability Limit of Hydrogen. Banff, Canada.
  46. Wen, J. et al. (2022) ‘Statistics, lessons learned and recommendations from analysis of HIAD 2.0 database’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(38), pp. 1708217096. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.170
  47. Wen, J.X., Hecht, E.S. and Mevel, R. (2025) ‘Recent advances in combustion science related to hydrogen safety’, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 107, p. 101202. Available at: 10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101202
  48. Wismer, S.E. et al. (2024) ‘PEM electrolyzer failure scenarios identified by failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 89, pp. 12801289. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.397
  49. Yang, R. et al. (2024) ‘Research gaps in quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of hydrogen transmission pipelines’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 71, pp. 916929. Available at: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.281
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 24
Submitted on: Oct 3, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 21, 2026
Published on: Feb 11, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Ethan S. Hecht, Dusty M. Brooks, Brian D. Ehrhart, Alex Gupta, published by KIT Scientific Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.