Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What Young Children’s Processing and Understanding of Compound Words Can Tell Us About Their Pragmatic Development Cover

What Young Children’s Processing and Understanding of Compound Words Can Tell Us About Their Pragmatic Development

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Benczes, R. (2006). Creative compounding in English. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://benjamins.com/catalog/hcp.19
  2. Bezuidenhout, A. (2019). Noun-noun compounds from the perspective of Relevance Theory. In B. Clark, K. Scott, & R. Carston (Eds.), Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation (pp. 174–186). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.016
  3. Bien, H., Levelt, W. J. M., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(49), 17876–17881. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508431102
  4. Bohn, M., Tessler, M. H., Merrick, M., & Frank, M. C. (2021). How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01145-1
  5. Clark, E. V. (1980). Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, Number 18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED192592
  6. Clark, E. V. (1995). Language acquisition: The lexicon and syntax. In J. L. Miller & P. D Elmas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 303–337). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012497770-9/50011-X
  7. Clark, E. V., Gelman, S. A., & Lane, N. M. (1985). Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development, 56(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130176
  8. Eiesland, E. A. (2016). The semantics of Norwegian noun–noun compounds: A corpus-based study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo].
  9. Eik, R. (2019). The morphosyntax of compounding in Norwegian [Doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology]. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2617105
  10. Fares, M. (2019). Noun–noun compound analysis: A holistic perspective. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Noun%E2%80%93Noun-Compound-Analysis%3A-A-Holistic-Perspective-Fares/fe3b766ac697ad3b11b3bedbc09b0c8883f313c1
  11. Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(11), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005
  12. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (2010). Relational knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 497–505.
  13. Jackendoff, R. (2010). The ecology of English noun–noun compounds. In R. Jackendoff, Meaning and the lexicon: The parallel architecture 1972–2010 (pp. 413–451). MIT Press.
  14. Kalashnikova, M., Mattock, K., & Monaghan, P. (2016). Flexible use of mutual exclusivity in word learning. Language Learning and Development, 12(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1023443
  15. Kalashnikova, M., Oliveri, A., & Mattock, K. (2019). Acceptance of lexical overlap by monolingual and bilingual toddlers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(6), 1517–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918808041
  16. Kalish, C. W., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2007). Conventionality and cognitive development: Learning to think the right way. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2007(115), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.178
  17. Kallen, R. W., Macpherson, M. C., Miles, L. K., & Richardson, M. J. (2022). Symmetries of social performance-environment systems. In K. Bicknell & J. Sutton (Eds.), Collaborative embodied performance (pp. 153–170). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350197725.ch-008
  18. Köymen, B., Lieven, E., Engemann, D. A., Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Children’s norm enforcement in their interactions with peers. Child Development, 85(3), 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12178
  19. Lamb, S. M. (1999). Pathways of the brain. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://benjamins.com/catalog/cilt.170
  20. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
  21. Li, S., Carlson, R., & Potts, C. (2022). Systematicity in GPT-3’s interpretation of novel English noun compounds (arXiv:2210.09492). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.09492
  22. Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1–2), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.874994
  23. Lyster, S.-A., Horn, E., & Rygvold, A.-L. (2010). Vocabulary and vocabulary development of Norwegian children and youth. Results from a try out of British Picture Vocabulary Scale II, Second edition (BPVT II). Spesialpedagogikk, 74, 35–43.
  24. Mellenius, I. (1996). Children’s comprehension of Swedish nominal compounds. In C. Johnson & J. H. V. Gilbert (Eds.), Children’s language (Vol. 9, pp. 167–182). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  25. Ngo, C. T., Newcombe, N. S., & Olson, I. R. (2018). The ontogeny of relational memory and pattern separation. Developmental Science, 21(2), e12556. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12556
  26. Nicoladis, E., & Krott, A. (2007). Word family size and French-speaking children’s segmentation of existing compounds. Language Learning, 57(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00407.x
  27. Ordbøkene.no – Bokmålsordboka og Nynorskordboka [Bokmål dictionary and Nynorsk dictionary]. (2022, January 27). Ordbøkene.no. https://ordbokene.no
  28. Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
  29. Prendergast, C. (2024). Losing the thread: How three- and five-year-olds predict the outcome of a story when non-literal language is used to update events. Cogent Psychology, 11(1), 2431422. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2024.2431422
  30. Ronfard, S., & Lane, J. D. (2018). Preschoolers continually adjust their epistemic trust based on an informant’s ongoing accuracy. Child Development, 89(2), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12720
  31. Schmidtke, D., Gagné, C. L., Kuperman, V., & Spalding, T. L. (2018). Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1468–1487. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1478-x
  32. Sia, M. Y., & Mayor, J. (2022). Improvements of statistical learning skills allow older children to go beyond single-hypothesis testing when learning words. Journal of Child Language, 49(6), 1268–1280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000532
  33. Snape, S., & Krott, A. (2022). The challenge of relational referents in early word extensions: Evidence from noun-noun compounds. Journal of Child Language, 49(1), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000793
  34. StataCorp LLC. (2023). Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 [Computer software]. StataCorp LLC.
  35. Telzer, E. H., Flannery, J., Humphreys, K. L., Goff, B., Gabard-Durman, L., Gee, D. G., & Tottenham, N. (2015). “The cooties effect”: amygdala reactivity to opposite-versus same-sex faces declines from childhood to adolescence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1685–1696. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00813
  36. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
  37. Tomasello, M. (2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E. L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language (pp. 69–88). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-child-language/usagebased-theory-of-language-acquisition/30A7D7DA467B600B632871678783A596
  38. van den Herik, J. C. (2021). Rules as resources: an ecological-enactive perspective on linguistic normativity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09676-0
  39. van Renswoude, D. R., & Visser, I. (2017). gazepath: Parse eye-tracking data into fixations (Version 1.2) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gazepath
  40. Wellman, H. M. (2017). The development of theory of mind: historical reflections. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12236
  41. Winner, E., Levy, J., Kaplan, J., & Rosenblatt, E. (1988). Children’s understanding of nonliteral language. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332964
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2025-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 421 - 454
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Claire Prendergast, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.