Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learning transitivity schemas: The role of the number of nominals and word order Cover

Learning transitivity schemas: The role of the number of nominals and word order

Open Access
|Oct 2024

References

  1. Abbot-Smith, K., Chang, F., Rowland, C., Ferguson, H., & Pine, J. (2017). Do two and three year old children use an incremental first-NP-as-agent bias to process active transitive and passive sentences?: A permutation analysis. PloS One, 12(10): e0186129. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186129
  2. Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2001). What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 16, 679–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00054-5.
  3. Aguado-Orea, J., Witherstone, H., Bourgeois, L., & Baselga, A. (2019). Learning to construct sentences in Spanish: A replication of the Weird Word Order technique. Journal of Child Language, 46(6), 1249–1259.
  4. Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 339–56.
  5. Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 952–965. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.952
  6. Ambridge, B., Noble, C., & Lieven, E. (2014). The semantics of the transitive causative construction: Evidence from a forced-choice pointing study with adults and children. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 293–311.
  7. Ammon, M. S., & Slobin, D. I. (1979). A cross-linguistic study of the processing of causative sentences. Cognition, 7, 3–17.
  8. Arunachalam, S., Escovar, E., Hansen, M., & Waxman, S. (2013). Out of sight, but not out of mind: 21-month-olds use syntactic information to learn verbs even in the absence of a corresponding event. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 417–425.
  9. Arunachalam, S., Leddon, E., Song, H., Lee, Y., & Waxman, S. (2013). Doing more with less: Verb learning in Korean-acquiring 24-month-olds. Language Acquisition, 20(4), 292–304.
  10. Arunachalam, S., Syrett, K., & Chen, Y. (2016). Lexical disambiguation in verb learning: Evidence from the conjoined-subject intransitive frame in English and Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00138
  11. Arunachalam, S., & Waxman, S. (2010). Meaning from syntax: Evidence from 2-year-olds. Cognition, 114(3), 442–446.
  12. Audisio, C. P., & Migdalek, M. J. (2020). Do simple syntactic heuristics to verb meaning hold up? Testing the structure mapping account over spontaneous speech to Spanish-learning children. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 65(4), 556–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2020.21
  13. Babineau, M., de Carvalho, A., Trueswell, J., & Christophe, A. (2021). Familiar words can serve as a semantic seed for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13010
  14. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B., Bates, E. (Eds.) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). Cambridge University Press.
  15. Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341–54.
  16. Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90017-8.
  17. Bavin, E., & Growcott, C. (2000). Infants of 24-30 months understand verb frames.In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 169–177). Wolters Kluwer.
  18. Benavides-Varela, S., & Gervain, J. (2017). Learning word order at birth: A NIRS study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 198–208.
  19. Bernard, C., & Gervain, J. (2012). Prosodic cues to word order: What level of representation? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 451.
  20. Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive bias for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). Wiley.
  21. Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). German children’s use of word order and case marking to interpret simple and complex sentences: Testing differences between constructions and lexical items. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 156–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052448
  22. Bridges, A. (1980). SVO comprehension strategies reconsidered: The evidence of individual patterns of response. Journal of Child Language, 7, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007042
  23. Bridges, A. (1984). Preschool children’s comprehension of agency. Journal of Child Language, 11, 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005973
  24. Brusini, P., Seminck, O., Amsili, P., & Christophe, A. (2021). The acquisition of noun and verb categories by bootstrapping from a few known words: A computational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661479
  25. Cameron‐Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–873.
  26. Candan, A., Küntay, A., Yeh, Y.-C., Cheung, H., Wagner, L., & Naigles, L. (2012). Language and age effects in children’s processing of word order. Cognitive Development, 27(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGDEV.2011.12.001
  27. Chan, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(2), 267–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.015
  28. Chan, A., Meints, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children’s comprehension of English SVO word order revisited: Testing the same children in act-out and intermodal preferential looking tasks. Cognitive Development, 25, 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGDEV.2009.10.002
  29. Chang, F., Kobayashi, T., & Amano, S. (2009). Social factors in the acquisition of a new word order. First Language, 29(4), 427–445.
  30. Chen, Y., LaTourrette, A. S, & Trueswell, J. (2023). Evidence for cross-situational syntactic bootstrapping: Three-year olds generalize verb meaning across different syntactic frames. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1243–1249). University of California.
  31. Christodoulopoulos, C., Roth, D., & Fisher, C. (2016). An incremental model of syntactic bootstrapping. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 38–43).
  32. Connor, M., Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Roth, D. (2008). Baby SRL: Modeling early language acquisition. In A. Clark & K. Toutanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL (pp. 81–88). Association for Computational Linguistics.
  33. Connor, M., Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Roth, D. (2010). Starting from scratch in semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, ACL (pp. 989-998).
  34. Dąbrowska, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Rapid learning of an abstract language-specific category: Polish children’s acquisition of the instrumental construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.021
  35. Dautriche, I., Cristia, A., Brusini, P., Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Christophe, A. (2014). Toddlers default to canonical surface‐to‐meaning mapping when learning verbs. Child Development, 85(3), 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12164
  36. De Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Fiévet, A.-C., & Christophe, A. (2021). Toddlers exploit referential and syntactic cues to flexibly adapt their interpretation of novel verb meanings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105017
  37. De Cat, C. (2007). French dislocation. Interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  38. Devescovi, A. E., D’Amico, S., Smith, S., Mimica, I., & Bates, E. (1998). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian and SerboCroatian: Local versus distributed cues. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 345–377). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585492230_020
  39. Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008a). German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x
  40. Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008b). Young German children’s early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11(4), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00703.x
  41. Fedzechkina, M., Newport, E., & Jaeger, T. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12346
  42. Feldman, H., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Gleitman, L. (1978). Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In A. Locke (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 102–123). Academic.
  43. Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children’s interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1). 41–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0012
  44. Fisher, C. (2002). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of abstract structure in 2.5-year-olds’ interpretations of novel verbs. Developmental Science, 5(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00209
  45. Fisher, C., Hall, D., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua, 92(1–4), 333–375.
  46. Fisher, C., Jin, K., & Scott, R. (2020). The developmental origins of syntactic bootstrapping. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 48–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12447
  47. Franck, J., Millotte, S., & Lassotta, R. (2011). Early word order representations: Novel arguments against old contradictions. Language Acquisition, 18(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2011.530536
  48. Franck, J., Millotte, S., Posada, A., & Rizzi, L. (2013). Abstract knowledge of word order by 19 months: An eye-tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000713
  49. Garcia, R., Dery, J., Roeser, J., & Höhle, B. (2018). Word order preferences of Tagalog-speaking adults and children. First Language, 38(6), 617–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723718790317
  50. Garcia, R., & Kidd, E. (2022). Acquiring verb-argument structure in Tagalog: A multivariate corpus analysis of caregiver and child speech. Linguistics, 60(6), 1855–1906. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0107
  51. Garcia, R., Roeser, J., & Höhle, B. (2019). Thematic role assignment in the L1 acquisition of Tagalog: Use of word order and morphosyntactic markers. Language Acquisition, 26(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2018.1525613
  52. Gavarró, A., Leela, M., Rizzi, L., & Franck, J. (2015). Knowledge of the OV parameter setting at 19 months: Evidence from Hindi–Urdu. Lingua, 154, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.001
  53. Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2012). Predicted errors in children’s early sentence comprehension. Cognition, 124(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.010
  54. Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17(8), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01767.x
  55. Gervain, J., Nespor, M., Mazuka, R., Horie, R., & Mehler, J. (2008). Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology, 57(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.001
  56. Göksun, T., Küntay, A., & Naigles, L. (2008). Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000907008471
  57. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). What language creation in the manual modality tells us about the foundations of language? The Linguistic Review, 22(2–4), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.199
  58. Hakuta, K. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology, 18, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.1.62
  59. He, A., & Wittenberg, E. (2020). The acquisition of event nominals and light verb constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(2), e12363. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12363
  60. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (1996). Single-Word Speakers’ Comprehension of Word Order. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension (pp. 99–122). MIT Press.
  61. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Naigles, L. (1996). Young children’s use of syntactic frames to derive meaning. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension (pp. 123–158). MIT Press.
  62. Horowitz, A., & Frank, M. (2015). Young children’s developing sensitivity to discourse continuity as a cue for inferring reference. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.08.003
  63. Hsu, D. (2018). Children’s syntactic representation of the transitive constructions in Mandarin Chinese. PloS One, 13(11): e0206788. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0206788
  64. Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese‐, English‐, and Japanese‐speaking children. Child Development, 79(4), 979–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01171.x
  65. Jiang, L., & Haryu, E. (2010). Young Chinese-speaking children’s understanding of the correspondence between verb meaning and argument structure [Conference presentation]. Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
  66. Jiang, L., & Haryu, E. (2014). Revisiting Chinese-speaking children’s understanding of argument structure. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12036
  67. Jin, K. (2015). The role of syntactic and discourse information in verb learning. [Ph.D. Dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  68. Jin, K., & Fisher, C. (2014). Early evidence for syntactic bootstrapping: 15-month- olds use sentence structure in verb learning. In W. Orman & M. Valleau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press.
  69. Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence comprehension (pp. 77–117). Cambridge University Press.
  70. Kail, M., & Charvillat, A. (1986). Linguistic cues in sentence processing in French children and adults from a crosslinguistic perspective. In I. Kurcz, G. W. Shugar & J. H. Danks (Eds.), Knowledge and language (pp. 349–374). North-Holland.
  71. Kail, M., & Charvillat, A. (1988). Local and topological processing in sentence comprehension by French and Spanish children. Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012605
  72. Kayama, Y., & Oshima-Takane, Y. (2022). The acquisition of argument structures of intransitive and transitive verbs in Japanese: The role of parental input. First Language, 42(1), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237211059970
  73. Kim, Y.-J. (2000). Subject/object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A crosslinguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008304903779
  74. Koulaguina, E., Legendre, G., Barrière, I., & Nazzi, T. (2019). Towards abstract syntax at 24 months: Evidence from subject-verb agreement with conjoined subjects. Language Learning and Development, 15(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2019.1571417
  75. Lee, J., & Naigles, L. (2005). The input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: A role for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 41, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.529
  76. Lee, J., & Naigles, L. (2008). Mandarin learners use syntactic bootstrapping in verb acquisition. Cognition, 106(2), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.004
  77. Leischner, F., Weissenborn, J., & Naigles, L. (2016). Universal and language--specific patterns in the acquisition of verb argument structures in German. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052450
  78. Lempert, H., & Kinsbourne, M. (1978). Children’s comprehension of word order: A developmental investigation. Child Development, 49, 1235–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8624.1978.TB04097.X
  79. Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (2003). Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Cognition, 87(3). 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00230-5
  80. Lin, K., Chang, Y., & Deen, K. (2022). The child acquisition of voice in Paiwan.In Y. Gong & F. Kpogo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press.
  81. Lindner, K. (2003). The development of sentence-interpretation strategies in monolingual German-learning children with and without specific language impairment. Linguistics, 41, 213–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2003.008
  82. MacWhinney, B., Pleh, C., & Bates, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90007-6
  83. Mahowald, K., Diachek, E., Gibson, E., Fedorenko, E., & Futrell, R. (2022). Grammatical cues are largely, but not completely, redundant with word meanings in natural language. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.12911
  84. Marcus, G., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. (1999). Rule learning by seven- month-old infants. Science, 283(5398), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5398.77
  85. Martin, A., Igarashi, Y., Jincho, N., & Mazuka, R. (2016). Utterances in infant-directed speech are shorter, not slower. Cognition, 156, 52–59.
  86. Matsuo, A., Kita, S., Shinya, Y., Wood, G., & Naigles, L. (2012). Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 39, 637–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000213
  87. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.08.001
  88. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2007). French children’s use and correction of weird word orders: A constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 34, 381–409. https://doi.org/1.1017/S030500090600794X
  89. McDonald, J. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90043-3
  90. Mintz, T. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition 90, 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00140-9
  91. Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013817
  92. Naigles, L., Fowler, A., & Helm, A. (1992). Developmental shifts in the construction of verb meanings. Cognitive Development, 7(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)80001-V
  93. Naigles, L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (1993). Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 104–140 ). Ablex.
  94. Naigles, L., & Kako, E. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition: Defining a role for syntax. Child Development, 64, 1665–1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04206.x
  95. Nappa, R., Wessel, A., McEldoon, K., Gleitman, L., & Trueswell, J. (2009). Use of speaker’s gaze and syntax in verb learning. Language Learning and Development, 5(4), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440903167528
  96. Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L. (2005). Argument realization in Hindi caregiver–child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.01.005
  97. Noble, C., Iqbal, F., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. (2016). Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 811–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000288
  98. Noble, C., Rowland, C., & Pine, J. (2011). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: Evidence from English‐learning children and the forced‐ choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35(5), 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01175.x
  99. Olguin, R., & Tomasello, M. (1993). Twenty-five-month-old children do not have a grammatical category of verb. Cognitive Development, 8(3), 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(93)80001-A
  100. Omaki, A., Lassotta, R., Kobayashi, T., Rizzi, L., & Franck, J. (2012). Delay of word order in Japanese? Evidence from a preferential looking study with 19 and 30-month-old children. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2826). Cognitive Science Society.
  101. Özdemir-Yilmazer, M. & Başol, H. (2017). Acquisition of verbs and argument structures in Turkish. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(18), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3615
  102. Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183, 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.026
  103. Perkins, L., Feldman, N., & Lidz, J. (2017). Learning an input filter for argument structure acquisition. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics, CMCL (pp. 11–19). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-0702
  104. Perkins, L., Feldman, N., & Lidz, J. (2022). The power of ignoring: Filtering input for argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science, 46(1), e13080. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13080
  105. Perkins, L., Knowlton, T., Williams, A., & Lidz, J. (2022). Thematic content, not number matching, drives syntactic bootstrapping. LingBuzz. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/006679
  106. Pozzan, L., Gleitman, L., & Trueswell, J. (2016). Semantic ambiguity and syntactic bootstrapping: The case of conjoined-subject intransitive sentences. Language Learning and Development, 12(1), 14–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1018420
  107. Reddy, A. & Deen, K. (2023). Effect of dependent case marking on frame compliance.In P. Gappmayr, & J. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 47th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 632–644). Cascadilla Press.
  108. Rispoli, M. (1989). Encounters with Japanese verbs: Caregiver sentences and the categorization of transitive and intransitive action verbs. First Language, 9(25), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272378900902506
  109. Roberts, K. (1983). Comprehension and production of word order in Stage I. Child Development, 54, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129705
  110. Šagi, L. (2017). The acquisition process of word order and the information status of arguments in English and Hungarian. In S. Halupka-Rešetar & S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Eds.), Studies in language and mind (pp. 129–173). Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad.
  111. Scott, R., Gertner, Y., & Fisher, C. (2018). Not all subjects are agents: Transitivity and meaning in early language comprehension. In K. Syrrett & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), Semantics in language acquisition (pp. 154–176). John Benjamins.
  112. Shi, H., He, A., Song, H., Jin, K., & Arunachalam, S. (2023). Learning verbs in English and Korean: The roles of word order and argument drop. Language Learning and Development, 20(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2023.2165926
  113. Shin, G.-H. (2021). Limits on the agent-first strategy: Evidence from children’s comprehension of a transitive construction in Korean. Cognitive Science, 45(9), e13038. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13038
  114. Shin, G.-H. (2022). Awareness is one thing and mastery is another: Korean--speaking children’s comprehension of a suffixal passive construction in Korean. Cognitive Development, 62, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101184
  115. Shin, G.-H., & Mun, S. (2022). Korean-speaking children’s constructional knowledge about a transitive event: Corpus analysis and Bayesian modelling. Journal of Child Language, 50(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500092100088X
  116. Sinclair, H., & Bronckart, J. (1972). SVO A linguistic universal? A study in developmental psycholinguistics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(72)90055-0
  117. Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 128–172). Cambridge University Press.
  118. Slobin, D., & Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6
  119. Smolík, F. (2015). Word order and information structure in Czech 3- and 4-year-olds’ comprehension. First Language, 35(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715596098
  120. Sokolov, J. (1988). Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 15, 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012095
  121. Strohner, H. & Nelson, K. (1974). The young child’s development of sentence comprehension: The influence of event probability, non-verbal context, syntactic form and strategies. Child Development, 45, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127821
  122. Tal, S., & Arnon, I. (2022). Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognition, 224, 105055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055
  123. Thomsen, D., & Poulsen, M. (2015). Cue conflicts in context: Interplay between morphosyntax and discourse context in Danish preschoolers’ semantic role assignment. Journal of Child Language, 42(6), 1237–1266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000786
  124. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press.
  125. Tomasello, M. & Abbot-Smith, K. (2002). A tale of two theories: Response to Fisher. Cognition, 83(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)-00172-X
  126. Trueswell, J., Kaufman, D., Hafri, A., & Lidz, J. (2012). Development of parsing abilities interacts with grammar learning: Evidence from Tagalog and Kannada. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 620–632). Cascadilla Press.
  127. Ural, A., Yuret, D., Ketrez, F., Koçbaş, D., & Küntay, A. (2009). Morphological cues vs. number of nominals in learning verb types in Turkish: The syntactic bootstrapping mechanism revisited. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(10), 1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902775525.
  128. Vion, M. (1992). The role of intonation in processing left and right dislocations in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(05)80004-9
  129. Weisleder, A., & Waxman, S. (2010). What’s in the input? Frequent frames in child-directed speech offer distributional cues to grammatical categories in Spanish and English. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990067
  130. Weist, R. (1983). The word order myth. Journal of Child Language, 10(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000516X
  131. Wittek, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Young children’s sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050290
  132. Yuan, S., & Fisher, C. (2009). “Really? She blicked the baby?” Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science, 20(5). 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02341.x
  133. Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development, 83(4), 1382–1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01783.x
  134. Zhu, J., Franck, J., Rizzi, L., & Gavarró, A. (2022). Do infants have abstract grammatical knowledge of word order at 17 months? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 49, 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000756
  135. Zhu, J., & Gavarró, A. (2019). Testing language acquisition models: Null and overt topics in Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 46(4), 707–732. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 495 - 524
Published on: Oct 26, 2024
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Cynthia Pamela Audisio, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.