References
- Alharbi, A. (2020). Framing English as a foreign language in fatwa discourse. Asiatic, 14(1),89–104. https://doi.org/10.31436/asiatic.v14i1.1838
- Adam, M. (2017). Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction, 10(2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2017-2-5
- Al-Kandaria, A. A. & Dasht, A. (2015). Fatwa and the internet: A study of the influence of Muslim religious scholars on internet diffusion in Saudi Arabia. Prometheus, 32(2), 127–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2014.998929
- Almahmoud, J. (2015). Framing on Twitter: How Saudi Arabians intertextually frame the Women2Drive campaign [Master’s thesis].
- Badar, M., Nagatab, M., & Tuenic, T. (2017). The radical application of the Isla-mist concept of Takfir. Arab Law Quarterly, 31, 132–160
- Black, A., & Hosen, N. (2009). Fatwas: Their role in contemporary secular Australia. Griffith Law Review, 18(2), 405–427.
- Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestation of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v3i1.799
- Brown, S., & Attardo, S. (2008). Understanding language, structure, interaction, and variation: An introduction to applied linguistics and sociolinguistics for nonspecialists. University Michigan Press.
- Caeiro, A. (2006). The shifting moral universes of the Islamic tradition of Ift?: A diachronic study of four Adab Al-fatwa manuals. The Muslim World, 96(4), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2006.00152.x
- Calder, N., Mojaddedi, J., & Rippin, A. (Eds.). (2003). Classical Islam: A sour-cebook of religious literature. Routledge.
- Drennan, D. (2013). Studying fatwas: Global and local answers to religious questions. In G. Marranci (Ed.), Studying Islam in practice (pp. 49–59). Routledge.
- Elyas, T., & Picard, M. (2010). Saudi Arabian educational history: Impacts on English language reaching. Education, Business, and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981011047961
- Fakhri, A. (2014). Fatwas and court judgments: A genre analysis of Arabic legal opinion. The Ohio State University Press.
- Fontaine, L. (2013). Analyzing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Fowler, R. (1985). Power. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 4 (pp. 61–82). Academic Press.
- Glassé, C. (1989). The concise encyclopedia of lslam. Harper & Row.
- Gonzálvez García, F. (2000). Modulating grammar through modality: A discourse approach. Elia, 1, 119–135.
- Hallaq, W. B. (1994). From fatwas to furu’: Growth and change in Islamic substantive. Islamic Law and Society, 1(1), 29–65.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 3. Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 179–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001882
- Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp. 140–165). Penguin.
- Halliday, M.A.K. (1998). On the grammar of pain. Functions of Language, 5(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.02hal
- Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) (3rd edition). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2006). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition (Repr ed.). Continuum.
- Halmari, H. & Virtanen, T. (2005). Persuasion across Genres: A linguistic approach (volume 130). John Benjamins Publishing.
- Herring, P. (2016). Complete English grammar rules. Farlex International. Holíčková, Z. (2019). Persuasive strategies in religious discourse: A contrastive analysis of scripted sermons [Master’s dissertation, Masaryk University]. https://is.muni.cz/th/glnnh/Master_s_Diploma_Thesis.pdf
- Hyland, K. (1995). The Author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics ant: Language Teaching, 18, 33–42.
- Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, l7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
- Hyland, K. (2014). Dialogue, community and persuasion in research writing. In C. Soler-Monreal & L. Gil-Salom (Eds.), Dialogicity in written specialized genres (pp. 1–21). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.02hyl
- Mathee, M. S. (2011). Muftis and the women of Timbuktu: History through Timbuktu’s fatwas, 1907-1960 [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town].
- Masud, M. K., Kéchichian, J. A., Messick, B., Joseph A. Dallal, A. S., and Hendrickson, J. (2019). “Fatwā.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic world. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t236/e0243
- McKenna, L. (2022). Translation of research interviews: Do we have a problem with qualitative rigor? Nurse Author & Editor, 32(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.31
- Mehmood, M. I. (2015). Fatwa in Islamic law, institutional comparison of fatwa in Malaysia and Pakistan: The relevance of Malaysian fatwa model for legal system of Pakistan. Arts and Social Science Journal, 6(3), 2–3.
- Mehmood, M. I., Chishti, S. A. & Mughal, M. J. (2015). Islamic concept of fatwa, practice of fatwa in Malaysia and Pakistan: The relevance of Malaysian fatwa model for legal system of Pakistan. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(9), 46–51.
- Monawer, A M., Grine, F., Abdullah, F., & Mohd Nor, M. R. (2019). Do fatwas hamper Muslim women’s socio-economic participation in Malaysia? Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp232-245
- Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2000). Analyzing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 126–142). Open University Press.
- Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality. 2nded. Cambridge UP.
- Perloff, R. M. (2017). The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century (6th ed.). Routledge.
- Pievskaya, I. (2010). Some linguocognitive means of manipulation in religious discourse. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330500959_Some_Linguocognitive_Means_of_Manipulation_in_Religious_Discourse
- Rahman, M. & Alhaisoni, E. (2013). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia: Prospects and challenges. Academic Research International, 4(1), 112–118.
- Suhadi, J. (2011). Epistemic modality and deontic modality: Two sides of a coin. JULISA, 11(2), 156–179.
- Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar. Arnold.