Drawing on social approval as a linguistic strategy: A discourse semantic analysis of judgement evaluation in suspected online romance scammer dating profiles

Lee, Kam-Fong; Chan, Mei Yuit; Ali, Afida Mohamad

doi:10.58734/plc-2024-0008

Abstract

Online romance fraud is a crime carried out largely using language, as the victim and scammer typically do not meet in person in their entire interaction. As a language-enabled crime, a linguistic analysis of scam communication can shed light on how language is used to attract victims and influence their thoughts and actions. This study examined the first stage in the online scam strategy, that is, the putting up of a dating profile (user biography) on online dating service websites. The analysis employs the judgement evaluation framework of appraisal theory to examine the extent to which scammer profiles differ from a set of general user profiles in terms of their use of social approval as a linguistic strategy to attract a more compliant victim type. Findings from the study can help in raising public awareness about how linguistic resources are employed in luring potential victims in scammer dating profiles.

References

Abidah, L. (2022). Critical discourse analysis of Kamala Harris’s judgment on Trump’s handling over pandemic in president election campaign of the United States 2020. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Pedagogy (ICOLP, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 170–174).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baroni, M., & Evert, S. (2009). Statistical methods for corpus exploitation. In A. Ludeling & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook volume 2 (pp. 777–802). De Gruyter Mouton.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion talk across corpora. Palgrave MacMillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bellz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–117. http://dx.doi.org/10125/25201
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2021). Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: Exploring variation in coder decision- -making. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Novel insights into patients’ life-worlds: The value of qualitative research. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(9), 720–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30296-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buchanan, T., & Whitty, M. T. (2014). The online dating romance scam: Causes and consequences of victimhood. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.772180
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Budd, C., & Anderson, J. (2011). Consumer fraud in Australasia: Results of the Australasian consumer fraud taskforce online Australia surveys 2008 and 2009. Australian Institute of Criminology.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Button, M., Nicholls, C. M., Kerr, J., & Owen, R. (2014). Online frauds: Learning from victims why they fall for these scams. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865814521224
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cambridge Dictionary (2015). Cambridge dictionaries online. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (Introducing qualitative methods series, 2nd edition). Sage Publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chung, C., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fielder (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343–359). Taylor & Francis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cramer, D. (2003). Acceptance and need for approval as moderators of self-esteem and satisfaction with a romantic relationship or closest friendship. The Journal of Psychology, 137(5), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600631
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cross, C., & Layt, R. (2022). “I suspect that the pictures are stolen”: Romance fraud, identity crime, and responding to suspicions of inauthentic identities. Social Science Computer Review, 40(4), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439321999311
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dong, T., & Lin, X. (2018). Attitude in appraisal theory: A comparative analysis of English versions of Changgan Xing. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, 6(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.6n.1p.42
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edwards, M., Suarez-Tangil, G., Peersman, C., Stringhini, G., Rashid, A., & Whitty, M. (2018). The geography of online dating fraud [Paper presentation]. Workshop on technology and consumer protection (ConPro), San Francisco, California, United States.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedman, H. S., & Tucker, J. S. (1990). Language and deception. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 257–270). John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi, (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review (pp. 225–258). Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancock, J. T., Curry, L., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2005). Automated linguistic analysis of deceptive and truthful synchronous computer-mediated communication. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 2005 (pp. 22c–22c). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancock, J. T., Curry, L. E., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2007). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739181
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01420.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ho, S. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2019). Context in a bottle: Language-action cues in spontaneous computer mediated deception. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control. American Journal of Sociology, 81(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/226035
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jensen, C., Hoben, M., Chamberlain, S. A., K. Marshall, S., Young, R. A., & Gruneir, A. (2022). Data analyses using the action project method coding technique: A guide. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221108035
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jong, K. (2019). Detecting the online romance scam: Recognising images used in fraudulent dating profiles. [University of Twente].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kopp, K., Layton, R., Sillitoe, J., & Gondal, I. (2015). The role of love stories in romance scams: A qualitative analysis of fraudulent profiles. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 9(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.56227
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kopp, C., Sillitoe, J., Gondal, I., & Layton, R. (2016). The online romance scam: A complex two-layer scam. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 24(2), 144–161.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Khosravi, M., & Babaii, E. (2017). Reply articles: Where impoliteness and judgment coincide. Journal of Politeness Research Language Behaviour Culture, 13(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0020
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, K. -F., Chan, M. Y., & Mohamad Ali, A. (2022). Self and desired partner descriptions in the online romance scam: A linguistic analysis of scammer and general user profiles on online dating portals. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-022-00169-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lo, S.-K., Hsieh, A.-Y., & Chiu, Y.-P. (2013). Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacDonald, G., Saltzman, J. L., & Leary, M. R. (2003). Social approval and trait self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00531-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McEachrane, M. (2009). Emotion, meaning, and appraisal theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308101418
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2018). Deception in mobile dating conversations. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, J. R. (2004). Sense and sensibility: Texturing evaluation. In J. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp. 270-304). Continuum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Modic, D., & Lea, S. E. (2013). Scam compliance and the psychology of persuasion. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364464
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neuendorf, K. A. (2009). Reliability for content analysis. In A. B. Jordan, D. Kunkel, J. Manganello & M. Fishbein (Eds.). Media messages and public health: A decisions approach to content analysis (pp. 67–87). Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nhan, J., Kinkade, P., & Burns, R. (2009). Finding a pot of gold at the end of an internet rainbow: Further examination of fraudulent email solicitation. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 452–475.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ngo, T., & Unsworth, L. (2015). Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: Refining attitude resources. Functional Linguistics, 2, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0013-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orchard, T. (2019). Online dating sites. In A. D. Lykins (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender (pp. 1–3). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_18-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 157–200). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rayson, P. (n.d.) Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rayson P., Berridge D. and Francis B. (2004). Extending the Cochran rule for the comparison of word frequencies between corpora. In Purnelle G., Fairon C., Dister A. (Eds.) Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Statistical analysis of textual data (JADT 2004), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, March 10-12, 2004 (Vol. 2, pp. 926–936). Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rayson, P., & Garside, R. (2000). Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In Proceedings of the workshop on Comparing Corpora, held in conjunction with the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000). 1-8 October 2000, Hong Kong (pp. 1–6).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rege, A. (2009). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring online dating scams and identity fraud. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(2), 494.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 396–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128793039003010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lin, M., Lucas, Jr., H. C., & Shmueli, G. (2013). Too big to fail: Large samples and the p-value problem. Information Systems Research, advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0480
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sorell, T., & Whitty, M. (2019). Online romance scams and victimhood. Security Journal, 32(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-019-00166-w
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Suarez-Tangil, G., Edwards, M., Peersman, C., Stringhini, G., Rashid, A., & Whitty, M. (2019). Automatically dismantling online dating fraud. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 1128–1137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2019.2930479
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tan, H. K., & Yoong, D. (2017). Preying on lonely hearts: A systematic deconstruction of an Internet romance scammer’s online lover persona. Journal of Modern Languages, 23(1), 28–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thesaurus. (2019). Thesaurus.com. Rock Holdings Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356437
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. ( 2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318067
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weisbuch, M., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whitty, M. T. (2015). Mass-marketing fraud: a growing concern. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(4), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2015.85
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whitty, M. T. (2018). Do you love me? Psychological characteristics of romance scam victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.07
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012). The psychology of the online dating romance scam. https://fido.nrk.no/d6f57fd73b9898b42c8c322c961c8255f-370677fbac5272b71d86047a5359b66/Whitty_romance_scam_report.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whitty, M. T., & Joinson, A. (2008). Truth, lies and trust on the Internet. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6f
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Drawing on social approval as a linguistic strategy: A discourse semantic analysis of judgement evaluation in suspected online romance scammer dating profiles

Abstract

Paradigm

My account