Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Concept Must Be Some Kind of Process Cover

A Concept Must Be Some Kind of Process

By:   
Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
  2. Beaney, M. (1997). The Frege Reader. Blackwell.
  3. Bosanquet, B. (1892). Knowledge and reality. Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
  4. Bradley, F. H. (1897). Appearance and reality: A metaphysical essay. Allen & Unwin.
  5. Bradley, F. H. (2011). Essays on truth and reality. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published, 1914). 10.1017/CBO9781139136525
  6. Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Harvard University Press.
  7. Brandom, R. (2002). Facts, norms, and normative facts: A reply to Habermas. European Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 356374. 10.1111/1468-0378.00115
  8. Brandom, R. (2011). Perspectives on pragmatism: Classical, recent, and contemporary. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674270572
  9. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3), 139159. 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
  10. Bulov, I. (2023). Metaphysics of concepts: In defense of the abilitist approach. Theoria, 89(5), 625639. 10.1111/theo.12483
  11. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 719. 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  12. Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky: Philosophy and education. John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118368732
  13. Ding, M., Xu, Y., Chen, Z., Cox, D. D., Luo, P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gan, C. (2023). Embodied concept learner: Self-supervised learning of concepts and mapping through instruction following. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 205, pp. 17431754. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v205/ding23b.html
  14. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. MIT Press.
  15. Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In I. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 111137). Hanshin Publishing Company.
  16. Giunchiglia, F., & Fumagalli, M. (2016). Concepts as (recognition) abilities. In R. Ferrario & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Formal ontology in information systems: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference (FOIS 2016) (pp. 153166). IOS Press. 10.3233/978-1-61499-660-6-153
  17. Green, N. (2006a). File:Cycl..png [Image]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cycl.png
  18. Green, N. (2006b). File:Analogy.png [Image]. Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Analogy.png
  19. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical review, 66(3), 377388. 10.2307/2182440
  20. Hegel, G. (1874). The logic of Hegel (W. Wallace, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
  21. Hegel, G. (1969). Science of logic. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315823546
  22. Hegel, G. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
  23. Hermans, H. J. M., & Dimaggio, G. (2004). The dialogical self in psychotherapy. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203314616
  24. Hommen, D. (2018). Frames and the ontology of particular objects. Dialectica, 72(3), 385409. 10.1111/1746-8361.12236
  25. Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a concept, that a person may grasp it? Mind & Language, 4(1–2), 68102. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00243.x
  26. Joachim, H. (1884). The nature of truth. Clarendon Press.
  27. Jordanous, A. (2020). Intelligence without representation: A historical perspective. Systems, 8(3), Article 31. 10.3390/systems8030031
  28. Kauffman, L. H. (2005). EigenForm. Kybernetes, 34(1–2), 129150. 10.1108/03684920510575780
  29. Kenny, A. (2010). Concepts, brains, and behaviour. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 81(1), 105113. 10.1163/9789042030190_007
  30. Kirchhoff, M. D., & Kiverstein, J. (2019). Extended consciousness and predictive processing: A third wave view. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315150420
  31. Laing, R. D., Philipson, S., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception. Tavistock.
  32. Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015). Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266), 13321338. 10.1126/science.aab3050
  33. Lotze, H. (1884). Lotze’s system of philosophy: Logic in three books of thought, of investigation, and of knowledge (B. Bosanquet, Ed. and Trans.; T. Green, R. L. Nettleship, F. H. Peters, F. C. Conybeare & R. G. Tatton, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
  34. Lotze, H. (1887a). Microcosmus (Vol. I; E. Hamilton & E. E. C. Jones, Trans.). T & T Clark.
  35. Lotze, H. (1887b). Microcosmus (Vol. II; E. Hamilton & E. E. C. Jones, Trans.). T & T Clark.
  36. Ongaro, G., Hardman, D., & Deschenaux, I. (2024). Why the extended mind is nothing special but is central. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), 841863. 10.1007/s11097-022-09827-5
  37. Manning, T. (2025). Some design considerations for concept-forming and concept-sharing in discursive agents. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design, RSD13. Article 27. https://rsdsymposium.org/concept-forming-and-concept-sharing-in-discursive-agents/
  38. Mao, J., Gan, C., Kohli, P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wu, J. (2019). The neuro-symbolic concept learner: Interpreting scenes, words, and sentences from natural supervision. ArXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.1904.12584
  39. Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2007). The ontology of concepts—Abstract objects or mental representations? Noûs, 41(4), 561593. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4494551
  40. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. D. Reidal Publishing Company. 10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
  41. McCarthy, J. (1996). Hubert Dreyfus, what computers still can’t do. Artificial Intelligence, 80(1), 143150. 10.1016/0004-3702(95)00086-0
  42. McGinn, C. (1989). Can we solve the mind–body problem? Mind, 98(391), 349366. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254848
  43. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Spartan Books.
  44. Minsky, M. (1974). A framework for representing knowledge (Memo No. 306) Massachusetts Institute for Technology A.I. Laboratory. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6089
  45. Minsky, M. (1986). Society of mind. Simon and Schuster.
  46. Nagel, T. (1980). What is it like to be a bat? In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in philosophy of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 159168). Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674594623.c15
  47. Pangaro, P. (2001). Paskian artifacts—Machines and models of Gordon Pask [Video]. Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/16379760
  48. Pangaro, P. (2008). Instructions for design and designs for conversations. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Handbook of conversation design for instructional applications (pp. 3548). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/978-1-59904-597-9.ch003
  49. Pask, G. (1972). Anti-hodmanship: A report on the state and prospects of CAI. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 9(5), 235244. 10.1080/1355800720090502
  50. Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition and learning: A cybernetic theory and methodology. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
  51. Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
  52. Pask, G. (1979a). An essay on the kinetics of language, behaviour and though [Unpublished report]. System Research Ltd.
  53. Pask, G. (1979b). A proto-language: Lp the thoughtsticker language [Unpublished report]. System Research Ltd. 10.1142/9789814537797
  54. Pask, G. (1980). An essay on the kinetics of language as illustrated by a protologic lp. Ars Semeiotica: International Journal of American Semiotics, 3, 93127.
  55. Pask, G. (1981). Organizational closure of potentially conscious systems. In M. Zeleny (Ed.), Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization (pp. 265308). Elsevier-North Holland.
  56. Pask, G. (1984). Review of conversation theory and a protologic (or protolanguage), Lp. ECTJ, 32(1), 340. 10.1007/BF02768767
  57. Pask, G., & de Zeeuw, G. (1992a). Interactions of actors, theory and some applications [Unpublished report].
  58. Pask, G., & de Zeeuw, G. (1992b). A succinct summary of novel theories. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems Research ‘92 (Vol. 1, pp. 665672). World Scientific.
  59. Pask, G., Kallikourdis, D., & Scott, B. C. (1975). The representation of knowables. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 1574. 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80003-4
  60. Petersen, W. (2015). Representation of concepts as frames. In T. Gamerschlag, D. Gerland, R. Osswald, & W. Petersen (Eds.), Meaning, frames, and conceptual representation (Vol. 2, pp. 4370). Dusseldorf University Press. 10.1515/9783110720129-003
  61. Piaget, J. (1971). Structuralism (C. Maschler, Trans.). Psychology Press.
  62. Rescher, N. (1966/2019). The logic of commands. Routledge. 10.4324/9780367854324
  63. Rescher, N. (1973). The coherence theory of truth. Clarendon Press.
  64. Roobaert, L., & Claeys, D. (2022). Trois modalités conversationnelles en conception architecturale: Apports de la théorie de la conversation de Gordon S. Pask. In SHS Web of Conferences, 147. Article 04002. 10.1051/shsconf/202214704002
  65. Scott, B. (2009). Conversation, individuals and concepts: Some key concepts in gordon pask’s interaction of actors and conversation theories. Constructivist Foundations, 4(3), 151158. http://constructivist.info/4/3/151
  66. Scott, B. (2021). Cybernetics for the social sciences. Brill. 10.1163/9789004464490
  67. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
  68. Surendran, S. (2023). Inferentialism and science education: towards meaningful communication in primary science classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, University College London]. UCL Discovery. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10172785/
  69. Temizel, E. (2025). ARCHITRAINER: Building interaction at the intersection of architecture, cybernetics, psychology and technology. Kybernetes. Advance online publication. 10.1108/K-08-2024-2170
  70. Tilak, S. (2025). A cybernetic guide to implementing AI for collaborative learning: A synthesis of four studies conducted with adult learners. Frontiers of Digital Education, 2(37). 10.1007/s44366-025-0074-7
  71. von Foerster, H. (2007). Objects: Tokens for (eigen-)behaviors. In Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition (pp. 261271). Springer.
  72. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. The MIT press. 10.1037/11193-000
  73. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans., P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Eds. & Trans; 4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58695/ec.19 | Journal eISSN: 2754-5512
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Submitted on: Aug 19, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 22, 2025
Published on: Nov 27, 2025
Published by: The Cybernetics Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Thomas Manning, published by The Cybernetics Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.